Minirosetta v1.28 bug thread

Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta v1.28 bug thread

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 6 · Next

AuthorMessage
dlsqbinder

Send message
Joined: 23 Nov 05
Posts: 3
Credit: 371,859
RAC: 0
Message 53734 - Posted: 17 Jun 2008, 2:43:24 UTC

Yesterday, and again today, I noticed a Rosetta unit active, but Windows Task Manager showed it getting no CPU. Both times I aborted the unit. The most recent looked like this in the message log:

6/16/2008 9:34:38 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result t405__CASP8_JUMPAB_RES81to192_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE__3758_12512_0 (aborted via GUI RPC)

I hate to see my PC sitting idle when I could be processing SETI or ClimatePrediction.

Any help would be appreciated.

Larry
ID: 53734 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile sslickerson

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 05
Posts: 101
Credit: 578,497
RAC: 0
Message 53735 - Posted: 17 Jun 2008, 3:05:56 UTC - in response to Message 53734.  

Yesterday, and again today, I noticed a Rosetta unit active, but Windows Task Manager showed it getting no CPU. Both times I aborted the unit. The most recent looked like this in the message log:

6/16/2008 9:34:38 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result t405__CASP8_JUMPAB_RES81to192_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE__3758_12512_0 (aborted via GUI RPC)

I hate to see my PC sitting idle when I could be processing SETI or ClimatePrediction.

Any help would be appreciated.

Larry


I just noticed this as well. I did a quick reboot and it started again. But agreed, CPU sitting idle is very painful...



ID: 53735 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Pepo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Sep 05
Posts: 115
Credit: 101,358
RAC: 0
Message 53739 - Posted: 17 Jun 2008, 11:10:38 UTC

On both Windows and Linux, tasks are crashing after a second, with stack traces, like:

h001__BOINC_CASP8_ABRELAX_t409_IGNORE_THE_REST-S25-7-S3-4--h001_-_3662_30002_1 - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005), Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x004C1C41 read attempt to address 0x0000000C
d100a_BOINC_CASP8_ABRELAX_alt_t405_IGNORE_THE_REST-S25-10-S3-7--d100a-_3648_5375_2 - process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63), SIGSEGV: segmentation violation

Peter
ID: 53739 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
funkydude

Send message
Joined: 15 Jun 08
Posts: 28
Credit: 397,934
RAC: 0
Message 53740 - Posted: 17 Jun 2008, 12:55:18 UTC

I'm just curious if you guys are aware that graphics only semi work on the new boinc v6 beta client with protection enabled. You can see text, just no images.
ID: 53740 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile adrianxw
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 05
Posts: 614
Credit: 9,874,285
RAC: 2,281
Message 53766 - Posted: 18 Jun 2008, 13:37:45 UTC
Last modified: 18 Jun 2008, 13:40:13 UTC

More validate errors against 1.28 after 3 hours. 171903129 and 171681810.

After seconds. 171627348.
Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.
ID: 53766 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 4877
Credit: 4,570,325
RAC: 1,904
Message 53791 - Posted: 18 Jun 2008, 20:36:17 UTC

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=170539088
This one crashed with a really long error log and a huge windows debugger call log.

I had paused the 5.96 stuff I was crunching on so that I could get a 1.28 task into the firewall ok before I go off for the night. But it died right away from the looks of it. I had to authorize it to go through the firewall, but I did that right away. So there was only a few seconds of delay getting started.
I then left it alone, and restarted the 5.96 tasks I was running.
ID: 53791 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile David E K
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 05
Posts: 1018
Credit: 4,003,213
RAC: 0
Message 53804 - Posted: 18 Jun 2008, 22:46:30 UTC - in response to Message 53675.  
Last modified: 18 Jun 2008, 22:49:27 UTC

I understood from the release log that 1.28 should eliminate unnecessary data base files. I completed two v1.28 tasks and I still have (now) 6 mini-rosetta databases totaling 76 MB. Delete doesn't work or doesn't work as I expect?


That is odd. Do you still have these? they should have been deleted. You can manually delete the databases (minirosetta_database_revXXXXX.zip). The current version is minirosetta_database_rev23035.zip.
ID: 53804 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Nothing But Idle Time

Send message
Joined: 28 Sep 05
Posts: 209
Credit: 139,545
RAC: 0
Message 53826 - Posted: 19 Jun 2008, 11:05:34 UTC - in response to Message 53804.  

I understood from the release log that 1.28 should eliminate unnecessary data base files. I completed two v1.28 tasks and I still have (now) 6 mini-rosetta databases totaling 76 MB. Delete doesn't work or doesn't work as I expect?


That is odd. Do you still have these? they should have been deleted. You can manually delete the databases (minirosetta_database_revXXXXX.zip). The current version is minirosetta_database_rev23035.zip.

I still have the mini DBs after processing several v1.28 tasks; something isn't working. Can anyone else verify that deletion of old DBs has worked on their windows XP machines?
ID: 53826 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile sslickerson

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 05
Posts: 101
Credit: 578,497
RAC: 0
Message 53833 - Posted: 19 Jun 2008, 15:28:10 UTC - in response to Message 53826.  

I understood from the release log that 1.28 should eliminate unnecessary data base files. I completed two v1.28 tasks and I still have (now) 6 mini-rosetta databases totaling 76 MB. Delete doesn't work or doesn't work as I expect?


That is odd. Do you still have these? they should have been deleted. You can manually delete the databases (minirosetta_database_revXXXXX.zip). The current version is minirosetta_database_rev23035.zip.

I still have the mini DBs after processing several v1.28 tasks; something isn't working. Can anyone else verify that deletion of old DBs has worked on their windows XP machines?


I can confirm, two DB's are still present along with the current version.



ID: 53833 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
bono_vox

Send message
Joined: 5 Dec 05
Posts: 8
Credit: 371,092
RAC: 0
Message 53834 - Posted: 19 Jun 2008, 15:39:57 UTC - in response to Message 53734.  

Yesterday, and again today, I noticed a Rosetta unit active, but Windows Task Manager showed it getting no CPU. Both times I aborted the unit. The most recent looked like this in the message log:

6/16/2008 9:34:38 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result t405__CASP8_JUMPAB_RES81to192_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE__3758_12512_0 (aborted via GUI RPC)

I hate to see my PC sitting idle when I could be processing SETI or ClimatePrediction.

Any help would be appreciated.

Larry


Same here. I aborted the WU and I'll keep an eye on the new ones.

18/06/2008 12:57:10 a.m.|rosetta@home|Starting t405__CASP8_JUMPAB_RES81to192_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE__3758_52133_0
18/06/2008 12:57:10 a.m.|rosetta@home|Starting task t405__CASP8_JUMPAB_RES81to192_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE__3758_52133_0 using rosetta_beta version 596
18/06/2008 03:05:22 a.m.|rosetta@home|Resuming task t405__CASP8_JUMPAB_RES81to192_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE__3758_52133_0 using rosetta_beta version 596
19/06/2008 10:15:28 a.m.|rosetta@home|Computation for task t405__CASP8_JUMPAB_RES81to192_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE__3758_52133_0 finished

ID: 53834 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile David E K
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 05
Posts: 1018
Credit: 4,003,213
RAC: 0
Message 53836 - Posted: 19 Jun 2008, 17:16:49 UTC - in response to Message 53833.  

I understood from the release log that 1.28 should eliminate unnecessary data base files. I completed two v1.28 tasks and I still have (now) 6 mini-rosetta databases totaling 76 MB. Delete doesn't work or doesn't work as I expect?


That is odd. Do you still have these? they should have been deleted. You can manually delete the databases (minirosetta_database_revXXXXX.zip). The current version is minirosetta_database_rev23035.zip.

I still have the mini DBs after processing several v1.28 tasks; something isn't working. Can anyone else verify that deletion of old DBs has worked on their windows XP machines?


I can confirm, two DB's are still present along with the current version.



Can you list the file names that are present?
ID: 53836 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile David E K
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 05
Posts: 1018
Credit: 4,003,213
RAC: 0
Message 53837 - Posted: 19 Jun 2008, 17:23:45 UTC

Okay, there must be an issue with the file cleanup on Windows. I'll have to look into this. Thanks for the heads up.
ID: 53837 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile rochester new york
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 06
Posts: 2808
Credit: 1,878,641
RAC: 807
Message 53840 - Posted: 19 Jun 2008, 18:05:04 UTC
Last modified: 19 Jun 2008, 18:05:36 UTC

ID: 53840 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile sslickerson

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 05
Posts: 101
Credit: 578,497
RAC: 0
Message 53844 - Posted: 19 Jun 2008, 18:18:32 UTC - in response to Message 53836.  

I understood from the release log that 1.28 should eliminate unnecessary data base files. I completed two v1.28 tasks and I still have (now) 6 mini-rosetta databases totaling 76 MB. Delete doesn't work or doesn't work as I expect?


That is odd. Do you still have these? they should have been deleted. You can manually delete the databases (minirosetta_database_revXXXXX.zip). The current version is minirosetta_database_rev23035.zip.

I still have the mini DBs after processing several v1.28 tasks; something isn't working. Can anyone else verify that deletion of old DBs has worked on their windows XP machines?


I can confirm, two DB's are still present along with the current version.


Can you list the file names that are present?


David,

I am showing:

"minirosetta_database_rev21566"
"minirosetta_database_rev22619"
"minirosetta_database_rev23035"





ID: 53844 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile David E K
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 05
Posts: 1018
Credit: 4,003,213
RAC: 0
Message 53847 - Posted: 19 Jun 2008, 18:47:56 UTC

There was a little miscommunication and the person who ran the local test confirms that we can reproduce this with the t405 task so we have something to work with now. It appears to be just a linux issue. When the boinc api calls exit, it stalls.
ID: 53847 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Feet1st
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 05
Posts: 1755
Credit: 4,231,919
RAC: 2,015
Message 53855 - Posted: 19 Jun 2008, 21:55:27 UTC

I've got a Mini 1.28 task running now, Win XP. I have rev21566, rev22619 and rev23035 all in Rosetta's projects directory.
Add this signature to your EMail:
Running Microsoft's "System Idle Process" will never help cure cancer, AIDS nor Alzheimer's. But running Rosetta@home just might!
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/
ID: 53855 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile David E K
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 05
Posts: 1018
Credit: 4,003,213
RAC: 0
Message 53858 - Posted: 19 Jun 2008, 22:27:33 UTC
Last modified: 19 Jun 2008, 22:28:19 UTC

yeah, the cleanup is not working. I figured out the problem. stupid mistake on my part. sorry. Hopefully it will work in the next release which should be coming soon. In the mean time, you can all manually remove the old minirosetta_database files.
ID: 53858 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Speedy
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Sep 05
Posts: 162
Credit: 703,854
RAC: 0
Message 53869 - Posted: 20 Jun 2008, 7:26:00 UTC - in response to Message 53858.  

yeah, the cleanup is not working. I figured out the problem. stupid mistake on my part. sorry. Hopefully it will work in the next release which should be coming soon. In the mean time, you can all manually remove the old minirosetta_database files.

What rev numbers of minirosetta_database files are safe to delete? Keep up the good work.
Cheers
Speedy
ID: 53869 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Winston_Smith

Send message
Joined: 24 Apr 08
Posts: 2
Credit: 24,918
RAC: 0
Message 53871 - Posted: 20 Jun 2008, 12:06:18 UTC

I have a problem with rosetta, starte only a few day's ago. When a task is terminated it doesn't try to report its results. It just stay's there at 100% 'running'
I'm on linux with rosetta beta 5.96.

I don't know how to fix this, so i suspended rosetta alltogether.
If you need more information, please ask.
ID: 53871 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 53874 - Posted: 20 Jun 2008, 13:21:48 UTC

Winston, that issue is discussed in a few different ways through this thread. A recent batch of tasks seems to have caused this to occur more frequently on Linus machines. Aborting the problem task will clear the problem until it is fully corrected.
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 53874 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 6 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta v1.28 bug thread



©2021 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org