Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta v1.28 bug thread
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 6 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
dlsqbinder Send message Joined: 23 Nov 05 Posts: 3 Credit: 371,859 RAC: 0 |
Yesterday, and again today, I noticed a Rosetta unit active, but Windows Task Manager showed it getting no CPU. Both times I aborted the unit. The most recent looked like this in the message log: 6/16/2008 9:34:38 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result t405__CASP8_JUMPAB_RES81to192_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE__3758_12512_0 (aborted via GUI RPC) I hate to see my PC sitting idle when I could be processing SETI or ClimatePrediction. Any help would be appreciated. Larry |
sslickerson Send message Joined: 14 Oct 05 Posts: 101 Credit: 578,497 RAC: 0 |
Yesterday, and again today, I noticed a Rosetta unit active, but Windows Task Manager showed it getting no CPU. Both times I aborted the unit. The most recent looked like this in the message log: I just noticed this as well. I did a quick reboot and it started again. But agreed, CPU sitting idle is very painful... |
Pepo Send message Joined: 28 Sep 05 Posts: 115 Credit: 101,358 RAC: 0 |
On both Windows and Linux, tasks are crashing after a second, with stack traces, like: h001__BOINC_CASP8_ABRELAX_t409_IGNORE_THE_REST-S25-7-S3-4--h001_-_3662_30002_1 - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005), Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x004C1C41 read attempt to address 0x0000000C d100a_BOINC_CASP8_ABRELAX_alt_t405_IGNORE_THE_REST-S25-10-S3-7--d100a-_3648_5375_2 - process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63), SIGSEGV: segmentation violation Peter |
funkydude Send message Joined: 15 Jun 08 Posts: 28 Credit: 397,934 RAC: 0 |
I'm just curious if you guys are aware that graphics only semi work on the new boinc v6 beta client with protection enabled. You can see text, just no images. |
adrianxw Send message Joined: 18 Sep 05 Posts: 653 Credit: 11,840,739 RAC: 1 |
|
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=170539088 This one crashed with a really long error log and a huge windows debugger call log. I had paused the 5.96 stuff I was crunching on so that I could get a 1.28 task into the firewall ok before I go off for the night. But it died right away from the looks of it. I had to authorize it to go through the firewall, but I did that right away. So there was only a few seconds of delay getting started. I then left it alone, and restarted the 5.96 tasks I was running. |
David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1480 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0 |
I understood from the release log that 1.28 should eliminate unnecessary data base files. I completed two v1.28 tasks and I still have (now) 6 mini-rosetta databases totaling 76 MB. Delete doesn't work or doesn't work as I expect? That is odd. Do you still have these? they should have been deleted. You can manually delete the databases (minirosetta_database_revXXXXX.zip). The current version is minirosetta_database_rev23035.zip. |
Nothing But Idle Time Send message Joined: 28 Sep 05 Posts: 209 Credit: 139,545 RAC: 0 |
I understood from the release log that 1.28 should eliminate unnecessary data base files. I completed two v1.28 tasks and I still have (now) 6 mini-rosetta databases totaling 76 MB. Delete doesn't work or doesn't work as I expect? I still have the mini DBs after processing several v1.28 tasks; something isn't working. Can anyone else verify that deletion of old DBs has worked on their windows XP machines? |
sslickerson Send message Joined: 14 Oct 05 Posts: 101 Credit: 578,497 RAC: 0 |
I understood from the release log that 1.28 should eliminate unnecessary data base files. I completed two v1.28 tasks and I still have (now) 6 mini-rosetta databases totaling 76 MB. Delete doesn't work or doesn't work as I expect? I can confirm, two DB's are still present along with the current version. |
bono_vox Send message Joined: 5 Dec 05 Posts: 8 Credit: 371,092 RAC: 0 |
Yesterday, and again today, I noticed a Rosetta unit active, but Windows Task Manager showed it getting no CPU. Both times I aborted the unit. The most recent looked like this in the message log: Same here. I aborted the WU and I'll keep an eye on the new ones. 18/06/2008 12:57:10 a.m.|rosetta@home|Starting t405__CASP8_JUMPAB_RES81to192_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE__3758_52133_0 18/06/2008 12:57:10 a.m.|rosetta@home|Starting task t405__CASP8_JUMPAB_RES81to192_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE__3758_52133_0 using rosetta_beta version 596 18/06/2008 03:05:22 a.m.|rosetta@home|Resuming task t405__CASP8_JUMPAB_RES81to192_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE__3758_52133_0 using rosetta_beta version 596 19/06/2008 10:15:28 a.m.|rosetta@home|Computation for task t405__CASP8_JUMPAB_RES81to192_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE__3758_52133_0 finished |
David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1480 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0 |
I understood from the release log that 1.28 should eliminate unnecessary data base files. I completed two v1.28 tasks and I still have (now) 6 mini-rosetta databases totaling 76 MB. Delete doesn't work or doesn't work as I expect? Can you list the file names that are present? |
David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1480 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0 |
Okay, there must be an issue with the file cleanup on Windows. I'll have to look into this. Thanks for the heads up. |
rochester new york Send message Joined: 2 Jul 06 Posts: 2842 Credit: 2,020,043 RAC: 0 |
|
sslickerson Send message Joined: 14 Oct 05 Posts: 101 Credit: 578,497 RAC: 0 |
I understood from the release log that 1.28 should eliminate unnecessary data base files. I completed two v1.28 tasks and I still have (now) 6 mini-rosetta databases totaling 76 MB. Delete doesn't work or doesn't work as I expect? David, I am showing: "minirosetta_database_rev21566" "minirosetta_database_rev22619" "minirosetta_database_rev23035" |
David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1480 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0 |
There was a little miscommunication and the person who ran the local test confirms that we can reproduce this with the t405 task so we have something to work with now. It appears to be just a linux issue. When the boinc api calls exit, it stalls. |
Feet1st Send message Joined: 30 Dec 05 Posts: 1755 Credit: 4,690,520 RAC: 0 |
I've got a Mini 1.28 task running now, Win XP. I have rev21566, rev22619 and rev23035 all in Rosetta's projects directory. Add this signature to your EMail: Running Microsoft's "System Idle Process" will never help cure cancer, AIDS nor Alzheimer's. But running Rosetta@home just might! https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/ |
David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1480 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0 |
yeah, the cleanup is not working. I figured out the problem. stupid mistake on my part. sorry. Hopefully it will work in the next release which should be coming soon. In the mean time, you can all manually remove the old minirosetta_database files. |
Speedy Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 163 Credit: 808,337 RAC: 0 |
yeah, the cleanup is not working. I figured out the problem. stupid mistake on my part. sorry. Hopefully it will work in the next release which should be coming soon. In the mean time, you can all manually remove the old minirosetta_database files. What rev numbers of minirosetta_database files are safe to delete? Keep up the good work. Cheers Speedy |
Winston_Smith Send message Joined: 24 Apr 08 Posts: 2 Credit: 24,918 RAC: 0 |
I have a problem with rosetta, starte only a few day's ago. When a task is terminated it doesn't try to report its results. It just stay's there at 100% 'running' I'm on linux with rosetta beta 5.96. I don't know how to fix this, so i suspended rosetta alltogether. If you need more information, please ask. |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Winston, that issue is discussed in a few different ways through this thread. A recent batch of tasks seems to have caused this to occur more frequently on Linus machines. Aborting the problem task will clear the problem until it is fully corrected. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Minirosetta v1.28 bug thread
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org