Problems with Rosetta version 5.62

Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.62

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Profile David E K
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 05
Posts: 1016
Credit: 3,933,688
RAC: 118
Message 40356 - Posted: 5 May 2007, 5:45:56 UTC

We think we fixed the OSX10.3.9 issue. A local test runs succesfully on 10.3.9, so the next update,which will be soon, should have the fix.
ID: 40356 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile fastdude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Nov 06
Posts: 10
Credit: 8,764
RAC: 0
Message 40389 - Posted: 6 May 2007, 0:04:10 UTC

I am getting a few WU\'s with low credit and showing the following error in the result: Too many restarts with no progress. Keep application in memory while preempted.

but my application preferences are to \"Keep application in memory\"

another one was: Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)

I have no idea what this means.

ID: 40389 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Feet1st
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 05
Posts: 1740
Credit: 3,654,981
RAC: 0
Message 40400 - Posted: 6 May 2007, 5:31:37 UTC - in response to Message 40389.  

I am getting a few WU\'s with low credit and showing the following error in the result: Too many restarts with no progress. Keep application in memory while preempted...
I have no idea what this means.

It basically means that the task was restarted 5 times in a row from the same point. Restarted meaning that the task had in fact either been removed from memory by BOINC preemption to run something else, or by BOINC being ended (perhaps as the PC was rebooted?)

After 5 tries with no further progress, Rosetta decides that there must be something about this task that doesn\'t agree with your machine, it ends the task and reports any completed models.

From the looks of it, your credit is low because your CPU seconds was low. I mean credit is based on number of models crunched, and the value of a model varies by task, so you received credit for the completed models. But you completed less models then most of your tasks, because you spent less time working on the one with low credit.
If having a DC project with BOINC is of interest to you, with volunteer or cloud computing resources, but have no time for the BOINC learning curve,
use a hosting service that understands BOINC projects: http://DeepSci.com
ID: 40400 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile arminius

Send message
Joined: 23 Sep 05
Posts: 8
Credit: 716,046
RAC: 36
Message 40407 - Posted: 6 May 2007, 9:54:40 UTC

Some problems (maybe) with MS Vista. After restart:

Problem 1
<core_client_version>5.8.16</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
- exit code -1073741502 (0xc0000142)
</message>
]]>

Problem 2
<core_client_version>5.8.16</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
- exit code 1073807364 (0x40010004)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# cpu_run_time_pref: 7200
# random seed: 1516893

</stderr_txt>
]]>
ID: 40407 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Rhiju
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 8 Jan 06
Posts: 223
Credit: 3,546
RAC: 0
Message 40459 - Posted: 7 May 2007, 1:20:40 UTC - in response to Message 40407.  

Hi: Thanks for posting. We\'re working on getting a machine to run Vista, also
so that maybe we can start compiling for 64bit native apps. Stay tuned! I guess the good news is that your client has steadily been returning successes since that spate of errors, so maybe you found a fix for the problem.

Some problems (maybe) with MS Vista. After restart:

Problem 1
<core_client_version>5.8.16</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
- exit code -1073741502 (0xc0000142)
</message>
]]>

Problem 2
<core_client_version>5.8.16</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
- exit code 1073807364 (0x40010004)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# cpu_run_time_pref: 7200
# random seed: 1516893

</stderr_txt>
]]>


ID: 40459 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mike Gelvin
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 05
Posts: 65
Credit: 10,612,039
RAC: 0
Message 40478 - Posted: 7 May 2007, 13:43:16 UTC

I have noticed several work units now take 450Meg + RAM during execution. Has the system requirements changed?

Specifically the \"FRA_a016_STRUCTURAL_GENOMICS_hom001_2_a016_2_1i74A_IGNORE_THE_REST\" series.


ID: 40478 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Feet1st
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 05
Posts: 1740
Credit: 3,654,981
RAC: 0
Message 40483 - Posted: 7 May 2007, 16:02:24 UTC
Last modified: 7 May 2007, 16:04:46 UTC

Upon reading Mike\'s post, I took a look. I have:
FRA_a016_STRUCTURAL_GENOMICS_hom001_2_a016_2_1i74A_IGNORE_THE_REST_3_1700_2871_0
using 400MB. Peak was 548MB.

I\'m sure these WUs were flagged as only for high memory systems, but these usage numbers still seem to be about double previous high memory tasks.

If having a DC project with BOINC is of interest to you, with volunteer or cloud computing resources, but have no time for the BOINC learning curve,
use a hosting service that understands BOINC projects: http://DeepSci.com
ID: 40483 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Feet1st
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 05
Posts: 1740
Credit: 3,654,981
RAC: 0
Message 40491 - Posted: 7 May 2007, 19:10:14 UTC

Just noticed that the aforementioned task is also taking about 3hrs per model.
If having a DC project with BOINC is of interest to you, with volunteer or cloud computing resources, but have no time for the BOINC learning curve,
use a hosting service that understands BOINC projects: http://DeepSci.com
ID: 40491 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Bin Qian

Send message
Joined: 13 Jul 05
Posts: 33
Credit: 36,897
RAC: 0
Message 40492 - Posted: 7 May 2007, 19:26:28 UTC - in response to Message 40483.  


Hi Mike and Feet1st,

You were right - these jobs were only sent out to high memory hosts! They are for a protein with 400 residues so it was expected to take up a bigger chunk of memory.

Bin

Upon reading Mike\'s post, I took a look. I have:
FRA_a016_STRUCTURAL_GENOMICS_hom001_2_a016_2_1i74A_IGNORE_THE_REST_3_1700_2871_0
using 400MB. Peak was 548MB.

I\'m sure these WUs were flagged as only for high memory systems, but these usage numbers still seem to be about double previous high memory tasks.


ID: 40492 · Rating: -1 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mike Gelvin
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 05
Posts: 65
Credit: 10,612,039
RAC: 0
Message 41435 - Posted: 25 May 2007, 15:32:36 UTC

Do work units with large memory requirements get granted more credit/hr due to the increase in resources consumed? I can sure tell when one of them is on my system (or worse, two of them at the same time). I understand I could limit the amount of memory consumed, but would rather not.
ID: 41435 · Rating: -1 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Astro
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Oct 05
Posts: 987
Credit: 500,253
RAC: 0
Message 41436 - Posted: 25 May 2007, 17:12:42 UTC

I don\'t think increased credit for memory use exists. However, Boinc management has been discussing such things, and also credit for wu size (network usage), and other participatory credit.
ID: 41436 · Rating: -1 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Cureseekers~Kristof

Send message
Joined: 5 Nov 05
Posts: 80
Credit: 689,603
RAC: 0
Message 41485 - Posted: 26 May 2007, 14:01:55 UTC

one of our members got a message from Windows, saying the Virual Memory was low, and he got a pop-up:
http://members.home.nl/goffinfam/rosetta.JPG

He got it with various WU\'s
Member of Dutch Power Cows
ID: 41485 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.62



©2019 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org