1% for 37 hours

Message boards : Number crunching : 1% for 37 hours

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

AuthorMessage
Grutte Pier [Wa Oars]~MAB The Frisian
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Nov 05
Posts: 87
Credit: 497,588
RAC: 0
Message 3889 - Posted: 22 Nov 2005, 8:12:37 UTC - in response to Message 3886.  
Last modified: 22 Nov 2005, 8:13:11 UTC

When can you say there is a problem ?
So after how many minutes/hours you should stop and restart the client or even stop the job ?

Now running for 20 minutes and still 1%.


New Wus with _omega_ take much longer than the old ones, my P4 needs 1-1,5h to jump to 20%, its a little bit confused because the checkpoints here are 20,40,60,80,100. Finished some in 2:20h or up to 4h.

It is a bit confusing, I agree, because now I have one at 10% after just 7 minutes.
But having it running during your work and coming home to find it still at 1% is not funny.
We'll see.

ID: 3889 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile HIVkiller1701

Send message
Joined: 2 Nov 05
Posts: 7
Credit: 871
RAC: 0
Message 4316 - Posted: 26 Nov 2005, 5:08:53 UTC - in response to Message 3883.  

When can you say there is a problem ?
So after how many minutes/hours you should stop and restart the client or even stop the job ?

Now running for 20 minutes and still 1%.



Indeed! I currently have one "stuck" @ 10%
I even allocated more resource share
gonna let it crunch on, "says" 17h to compleation
ID: 4316 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Tern
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 05
Posts: 575
Credit: 4,507,064
RAC: 1,089
Message 4317 - Posted: 26 Nov 2005, 5:45:29 UTC - in response to Message 4316.  

Indeed! I currently have one "stuck" @ 10%
I even allocated more resource share
gonna let it crunch on, "says" 17h to compleation


You are on a Mac - I've seen this same problem. First, make sure that you're set to "leave application in memory". Rather than increase resource share, it would be even better to "suspend" everything else and let Rosetta crunch on this one non-stop. I had one that took 31 hours to complete... the good news is that I got something like 120 credits for it when it finally _did_ finish.

ID: 4317 · Rating: 1 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
STE\/E

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 125
Credit: 3,737,398
RAC: 24,755
Message 4342 - Posted: 26 Nov 2005, 11:26:27 UTC - in response to Message 3173.  
Last modified: 26 Nov 2005, 11:34:32 UTC

I did suggest that a time "cap" be placed on the start up of a work unit, though it was pointed out that the use of a fixed amount of time is not viable...

It looks like there is a least some kind of cap present.
resultid=1372617 reports "Maximum CPU time exceeded" after 60,359.58 CPU time.

It hasn't been sent to another user, perhaps the project team can investigate this one?


I've had 6 WU's like that "Maximum CPU time exceeded" in the last 12 hours on 6 different Computers, I'm starting to get a severe case of the Jitters running any of these WU's.

They all seem to get the Error around the 6:34:00 CPU Time Mark for what ever reason even though I've had WU's run longer than that and Complete Successfully ...
ID: 4342 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
STE\/E

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 125
Credit: 3,737,398
RAC: 24,755
Message 4393 - Posted: 26 Nov 2005, 21:19:07 UTC

Is anybody else getting these "Maximum CPU time exceeded" Error's, I've had 6 more of them since this morning ... ??? Thats probably around 75 hours on my Computers of wasted CPU Time in the last 24 hr's for me ... :/

If there is a set Time Limit before they Error out maybe it needs to be increased ... ???
ID: 4393 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Webmaster Yoda
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 161
Credit: 162,253
RAC: 0
Message 4406 - Posted: 27 Nov 2005, 1:03:51 UTC - in response to Message 4393.  
Last modified: 27 Nov 2005, 1:06:03 UTC

Is anybody else getting these "Maximum CPU time exceeded" Error's


I note the original WU with that error (by relic) was running BOINC 4.45. What version of BOINC are you using, Poorboy? I'm running 5.2.6 on most of my machines and have never seen that error (or a WU that took 16-17 hours).

I have had only 1 error in the last week (with about 200 WU completed)

*** Join BOINC@Australia today ***
ID: 4406 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
STE\/E

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 125
Credit: 3,737,398
RAC: 24,755
Message 4414 - Posted: 27 Nov 2005, 4:20:45 UTC

I'm running version 5.2.7 right now, it seems the Errors may have started about 4 or 5 days ago right about the time I installed it. I was running v5.2.6 myself before that and never noticed any errors. I may switch back again if they continue just to see if I get any with it.
ID: 4414 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile HIVkiller1701

Send message
Joined: 2 Nov 05
Posts: 7
Credit: 871
RAC: 0
Message 4417 - Posted: 27 Nov 2005, 6:28:14 UTC - in response to Message 4317.  

Indeed! I currently have one "stuck" @ 10%
I even allocated more resource share
gonna let it crunch on, "says" 17h to compleation


You are on a Mac - I've seen this same problem. First, make sure that you're set to "leave application in memory". Rather than increase resource share, it would be even better to "suspend" everything else and let Rosetta crunch on this one non-stop. I had one that took 31 hours to complete... the good news is that I got something like 120 credits for it when it finally _did_ finish.


Thanks, I'll give it a try
Sir Tralfaz
ID: 4417 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Tern
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 05
Posts: 575
Credit: 4,507,064
RAC: 1,089
Message 4421 - Posted: 27 Nov 2005, 6:57:11 UTC - in response to Message 4417.  

Thanks, I'll give it a try


Um... it's already been another 24 hours - if it's had that much run time and is STILL on 10%, I'd abort it...

ID: 4421 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

Message boards : Number crunching : 1% for 37 hours



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org