Units that are not going to be completed before deadline

Author	Message
DoubleTop Send message Joined: 20 Sep 05 Posts: 10 Credit: 1,120,456 RAC: 0	Message 11107 - Posted: 21 Feb 2006, 13:02:25 UTC Last week, I had a machine on 24/7, this week it is not. Problem is I now have a lot of units that will not complete before the deadline tomorrow. Two questions; 1. Is it worth crunching these for the science ? 2. What will happen regarding credit for them if I crunch them ? Cheers, DT. ID: 11107 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Whl. Send message Joined: 29 Dec 05 Posts: 203 Credit: 275,802 RAC: 0	Message 11130 - Posted: 21 Feb 2006, 17:59:10 UTC - in response to Message 11107. Last modified: 21 Feb 2006, 18:00:37 UTC Yep, last week I had a lot of those Fast_Abinitio jobs that were completing in 10, 15 and 30 minutes or so. As I have a 4 day cache set, lots of the more recent Production_??????? jobs were downloaded then, which are finishing in anything from 2+ to 5+ hours now. Many will not finish before the deadline as the predicted finish must have been originally based on the faster jobs. (Still using Rosetta 4.81 at the moment). What is the procedure with these jobs which wont make the deadline ? Should they be aborted so they can be sent out again ? Or should they be left to do their own thing ? ID: 11130 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1018 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0	Message 11135 - Posted: 21 Feb 2006, 19:06:44 UTC You can abort them. ID: 11135 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Whl. Send message Joined: 29 Dec 05 Posts: 203 Credit: 275,802 RAC: 0	Message 11140 - Posted: 21 Feb 2006, 19:20:11 UTC - in response to Message 11135. Thank you Dr Kim. ID: 11140 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

DoubleTop Send message Joined: 20 Sep 05 Posts: 10 Credit: 1,120,456 RAC: 0	Message 11159 - Posted: 21 Feb 2006, 22:51:51 UTC Cheers :) DT. ID: 11159 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

dcdc Send message Joined: 3 Nov 05 Posts: 1831 Credit: 119,558,999 RAC: 7,809	Message 11161 - Posted: 21 Feb 2006, 23:33:30 UTC - in response to Message 11159. Last modified: 21 Feb 2006, 23:33:40 UTC would it be beneficial to introduce a purge function in BOINC for this? ID: 11161 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Nite Owl Send message Joined: 2 Nov 05 Posts: 87 Credit: 3,019,449 RAC: 0	Message 11162 - Posted: 22 Feb 2006, 0:03:30 UTC - in response to Message 11161. would it be beneficial to introduce a purge function in BOINC for this? Sounds reasonable to me...Purge worked great at FAD... <thumbsup> Join the Teddies@WCG ID: 11162 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote