Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10850K CPU...CPU stats show more average cores than cores available

Message boards : Number crunching : Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10850K CPU...CPU stats show more average cores than cores available

Author	Message
Vester Send message Joined: 2 Nov 05 Posts: 257 Credit: 3,254,194 RAC: 14,110	Message 102851 - Posted: 29 Sep 2021, 13:33:16 UTC From the CPU Performance table: Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10850K CPU @ 3.60GHz [Family 6 Model 165 Stepping 5] 39 (computers) 20.82 (ave. cores/computer) 5.61 (GFLOPS/core) 116.81 (GFLOPS/computer) The CPU in question has ten cores which can be hyperthreaded for a total core count of 20. I would not expect to see an average greater than 20. ID: 102851 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1486 Credit: 14,668,567 RAC: 14,222	Message 102853 - Posted: 30 Sep 2021, 4:53:55 UTC - in response to Message 102851. From the CPU Performance table: Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10850K CPU @ 3.60GHz [Family 6 Model 165 Stepping 5] 39 (computers) 20.82 (ave. cores/computer) 5.61 (GFLOPS/core) 116.81 (GFLOPS/computer) The CPU in question has ten cores which can be hyperthreaded for a total core count of 20. I would not expect to see an average greater than 20. If you look at the rest of the list you will see there are plenty of other systems with fractional Avg. cores/computer. Some people may have an odd number of cores blocked to BOINC usage, so that would probably result in the odd fractional core/thread numbers. Grant Darwin NT ID: 102853 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

dcdc Send message Joined: 3 Nov 05 Posts: 1829 Credit: 115,847,520 RAC: 60,333	Message 102854 - Posted: 30 Sep 2021, 6:43:43 UTC Maybe a BOINC install had been moved from one machine to another with a different core count. ID: 102854 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10850K CPU...CPU stats show more average cores than cores available