Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
Previous · 1 . . . 272 · 273 · 274 · 275 · 276 · 277 · 278 . . . 303 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1689 Credit: 18,016,030 RAC: 23,735 |
The problem is that some of these wus are near the deadline.And it will stop you from being able to get new work from other projects as well. So return them & get more work & hope the project fixes up all the failed Validation Tasks when they fix the Validation issue. As it is, if they don't Validate then they won't (or they shouldn't) go into the science database. If it's not Valid, then it's not going to be of use to science. That's the whole point of Validation, otherwise it's just garbage in, and then garbage out. Grant Darwin NT |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 1995 Credit: 9,653,827 RAC: 7,305 |
As it is, if they don't Validate then they won't (or they shouldn't) go into the science database. If it's not Valid, then it's not going to be of use to science. That's the whole point of Validation, otherwise it's just garbage in, and then garbage out. That's the point!! Thousands of wu wasted... |
kotenok2000 Send message Joined: 22 Feb 11 Posts: 262 Credit: 499,663 RAC: 802 |
I don't want to recieve more posts about this unless it is a post from staff member that fixed it. |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2127 Credit: 41,266,340 RAC: 8,573 |
Let's see if these work units are still credited.If it's not Valid, there is no Credit. Rosetta does (or did) have an overnight scheduled job that sought out tasks that completed successfully but didn't validate in order to credit them anyway, but that clearly hasn't happened yet (overnight on the West Coast presumably). Let me see if I can revive my contact to the project team, seeing as I haven't contacted them for a year. Maybe they'e less fed up of me by now. Edit: Email sent. We wait |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 1995 Credit: 9,653,827 RAC: 7,305 |
|
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
28 tasks with validate error...great....but i suppose thats just the way it goes with a beta. |
rjs5 Send message Joined: 22 Nov 10 Posts: 273 Credit: 23,059,781 RAC: 4,600 |
28 tasks with validate error...great....but i suppose thats just the way it goes with a beta. NO. That is the way Rosetta has chosen. There should be a preference option that allows you to OPT OUT of the BETA work units. This is ESPECIALLY true if the project gives ZERO credit for the computing. About 25% of the BETA work units I am receiving run for several hours, finish without errors, and are marked INVALID as wasted work. These INVALID results are a problem with the Rosetta BETA binary. Rosetta has chosen to run all the BETA units for hours instead of minutes. They could run the BETA binaries for minutes instead of hours until the BETA binaries have some successes. |
Bryn Mawr Send message Joined: 26 Dec 18 Posts: 394 Credit: 12,127,757 RAC: 4,390 |
28 tasks with validate error...great....but i suppose thats just the way it goes with a beta. They might have beta in the name but these have been the production WUs for some time now. |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2127 Credit: 41,266,340 RAC: 8,573 |
Let's see if these work units are still credited.If it's not Valid, there is no Credit. Looking like they're still fed up with me... no response & no change I can notice |
hadron Send message Joined: 4 Sep 22 Posts: 68 Credit: 1,560,763 RAC: 305 |
Yep, The Validator is borked, First one here (of 52 in total) was at 4:28:28 UTC 3 April; another task reported at the same time did validate. Then 16 tasks in a row were validated, the last at 12:54:34 UTC, after which everything was marked invalid. (There are no Rosetta tasks running on my system since 4 Apr 2024, 21:05:07 UTC at the latest.) The only thing that appears common among them all is that they all took approximately 10800 to 10900 seconds to run. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1689 Credit: 18,016,030 RAC: 23,735 |
These INVALID results are a problem with the Rosetta BETA binary.No, they are a result of the system outage, which when resolved came back with the Validator not working (even though the Server Staus page shows it as running). I would expect the vast majority of all the Invalid Tasks are actually Valid. They just need to fix the Validator, then re-Validate all the Invalid Tasks. That way every one will get Credit for the work they have done, except for those few Tasks that are actually Invalid. Grant Darwin NT |
MJH333 Send message Joined: 29 Jan 21 Posts: 18 Credit: 6,329,333 RAC: 10,530 |
Looking like they're still fed up with me... no response & no change I can noticeThank you for trying. The Server Status info on the Rosetta home page has not updated since 4 Apr 2024, 11:03:04 UTC. I hope this will start updating again once the validator is fixed. |
MJH333 Send message Joined: 29 Jan 21 Posts: 18 Credit: 6,329,333 RAC: 10,530 |
[Duplicate post deleted] |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2127 Credit: 41,266,340 RAC: 8,573 |
Looking like they're still fed up with me... no response & no change I can noticeThank you for trying. On the home page, yes. Somehow the Server Status page itself is being refreshed. I've been scouting around for another appropriate email address and in the process discovered that the one I've been using has been removed - but I'm not getting any bounces back - so maybe I'm not getting ignored at all but my mails are going to dev/nul or something. When I get home on Sunday I'm going to try a different more generic email address and see if I can get a message to whatever IT people they use rather than go via researchers. |
MStenholm Send message Joined: 18 Apr 20 Posts: 18 Credit: 26,152,783 RAC: 19,905 |
I just had my first job validated when it was returned Received 6 Apr 2024, 5:24:13 UTC Server state Over Outcome Success Older returned jobs are still invalid |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2127 Credit: 41,266,340 RAC: 8,573 |
I just had my first job validated when it was returned You have indeed. I was just coming back to correct myself that the date/time of the server info on the home page had finally been updated and your information indicates that was just a symptom of a wider correction. As you also say, hopefully their next job is to revalidate our older tasks from April 3rd ~22:00 UTC to April 6th ~05:20 |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1689 Credit: 18,016,030 RAC: 23,735 |
As you also say, hopefully their next job is to revalidate our older tasks from April 3rd ~22:00 UTC to April 6th ~05:20*Fingers crossed* Grant Darwin NT |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1689 Credit: 18,016,030 RAC: 23,735 |
Picked up a couple of resends, and they Validated OK. Just need the Invalids re-validated & all will be good. Grant Darwin NT |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2127 Credit: 41,266,340 RAC: 8,573 |
And we're back... And again, we're back. Another 2-3hr outage of the entire website. I did send another email - and mentioned how Validation didn't come back last time, so to double-check that. And snuck in a request for revalidation of tasks from April 4-6 that all errored out, just in case they're in a good mood (I didn't mention it last time) |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 1995 Credit: 9,653,827 RAC: 7,305 |
Just need the Invalids re-validated & all will be good. No optimism here |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org