Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
Previous · 1 . . . 198 · 199 · 200 · 201 · 202 · 203 · 204 . . . 310 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Jean-David Beyer Send message Joined: 2 Nov 05 Posts: 196 Credit: 6,613,600 RAC: 5,017 |
He gave you the wrong information Thank you for pointing out that the information was incorrect. As far as installing Virtual Box, I do not want to. I willingly give up the ability to do Python jobs. |
kotenok2000 Send message Joined: 22 Feb 11 Posts: 272 Credit: 507,897 RAC: 248 |
You do not have to press "Application details Show" You have to scroll down and press skip. https://imgur.com/a/QcsWcgH |
Jean-David Beyer Send message Joined: 2 Nov 05 Posts: 196 Credit: 6,613,600 RAC: 5,017 |
You do not have to press "Application details Show" There is no skip. [code]Computer 5910575 Computer information IP address Show IP address Domain name localhost.localdomain Local Standard Time UTC -4 hours Created 14 Nov 2020, 17:25:40 UTC Total credit 1,255,892 Average credit 7,258.57 Cross project credit BOINCstats.com Free-DC CPU type GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(R) W-2245 CPU @ 3.90GHz [Family 6 Model 85 Stepping 7] Number of processors 16 Coprocessors --- Operating System Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.5 (Ootpa) [4.18.0-348.20.1.el8_5.x86_64|libc 2.28 (GNU libc)] BOINC version 7.16.11 Memory 63902.14 MB Cache 16896 KB Swap space 15992 MB Total disk space 488.04 GB Free Disk Space 482.44 GB Measured floating point speed 6580.65 million ops/sec Measured integer speed 31846.99 million ops/sec Average upload rate 406.17 KB/sec Average download rate 23155.98 KB/sec Average turnaround time 1.45 days Application details Show Tasks 32 Number of times client has contacted server 4753 Last time contacted server 4 Apr 2022, 17:02:26 UTC Fraction of time BOINC is running 99.96% While BOINC is running, fraction of time computing is allowed 100.00% While is BOINC running, fraction of time GPU computing is allowed 100.00% Task duration correction factor 1 Location Home Update location Merge duplicate records of this computer Merge |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 12,116,986 RAC: 7,326 |
There is no skip.Maybe they don't bother showing you the skip button if you have no VB installed. Just ignore the error message. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Thank you for pointing out that the information was incorrect. As far as installing Virtual Box, I do not want to. I willingly give up the ability to do Python jobs.[/quote] ---------- ok..then make sure you disable your settings for virtual box work. Then you are limited to the sporadic 4.2 work as it comes. You will get a few days work every week or so. |
.clair. Send message Joined: 2 Jan 07 Posts: 274 Credit: 26,399,595 RAC: 0 |
Maybe they don't bother showing you the skip button if you have no VB installed. Just ignore the error message. I can confirm that if virtual pox is not installed you don't get `allowed` to `skip` your buttons . the event log messyouaboutages just keep telling you that your system is not infected with it . |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Maybe they don't bother showing you the skip button if you have no VB installed. Just ignore the error message. Infected? just because your system doesn't run it or you don't want to use it, does not mean it infects a system. People don't know it won't run on their system, because the project fails to mention what the minimum requirements are to use it. What the minimum processor is, minimum memory needed depending on how many cores you give to the project, which appears to be an all or nothing option as you can not say how many cores it can use in your account preferences and if you try a script then that causes problems as well. There are a lot of things this project could do better, but as it has been said many many times, they don't care as long as they get enough results back to get the data they need. Outside of this project, VB works just fine on LHC ATLAS and 4 other projects that I know are full time. |
Paul V Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 3,229,430 RAC: 875 |
Subject: +30 hours to run 8 hr tasks I recently installed VB. I'm on Win 11, Intel i5-11, running VB 6.1.32 (the recommended Boinc version), and all Rosetta tasks are estimated by Boinc to take 8 hrs, which sometimes take 4 hrs, and some take +30 hrs. Is this normal? The ones that take the longest often indicate, for ex, time remaining = 30 min, and 8 hrs later, the time remaining = 20 min -- which seems odd. Do I need to tweak something? |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 12,116,986 RAC: 7,326 |
Outside of this project, VB works just fine on LHC ATLAS and 4 other projects that I know are full time.Cosmology and the now closed Kryptos only work properly in VB 5. VB 6 hasn't been taken up well by project programmers. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 12,116,986 RAC: 7,326 |
Subject: +30 hours to run 8 hr tasksRosetta always used to have 8 hour tasks more or less exactly (within 10 minutes), they ran for that time and gave back whatever data you'd calculated. But the newer ones seem to be more like other projects, shorter time on faster processors. Not sure what an Intel I5-11 is, do you mean 11th generation? In which case that should be fast. You should not be getting 30 hours. Check to see if your CPU is actually heavily in use using Windows task manager. I fixed a lot of mine by changing a setting in my antivirus. If you have AVG or Avast (and probably others) you need to find the setting to not check virtual machines. |
Paul V Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 3,229,430 RAC: 875 |
Subject: +30 hours to run 8 hr tasks Yes. Intel 11th Gen. I'm using Bitdefender (which just released a new version). It's odd to me that some tasks take only a few hrs vs the +30 hr tasks, which suggests to me that Bitdefender is not a factor (but maybe I'm wrong). More likely that it the tasks (the ones that start with "aaam" seem to be the "problem" tasks that take so long.[/quote] |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 12,116,986 RAC: 7,326 |
Yes. Intel 11th Gen. I'm using Bitdefender (which just released a new version). It's odd to me that some tasks take only a few hrs vs the +30 hr tasks, which suggests to me that Bitdefender is not a factor (but maybe I'm wrong). More likely that it the tasks (the ones that start with "aaam" seem to be the "problem" tasks that take so long.Not sure what's going on there. My machines have always either completed every single one, or none at all. What proportion of yours are failing? I'll grab a big bunch of them and try it out here on 5 of my 7 varied machines (they're doing folding at home at the moment but most of them aren't near deadlines). |
kotenok2000 Send message Joined: 22 Feb 11 Posts: 272 Credit: 507,897 RAC: 248 |
From what i could understand his tasks do not fail, but some run for 30 hours before completing. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
What is your CPU to Run time difference? Have you gone through your stderr file to see if anything abnormal showed up there? An idea what percentage of the core that task is using? 30 hours is absurd. If it doesn't finish in 8 CPU time, then it stuck somehow. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 12,116,986 RAC: 7,326 |
Update, I made a mistake. I actually only have 2 machines (of 7) that can run Rosetta Python. VB 5 makes Cosmology work. Antivirus settings make LHC work. But Rosetta needs a CPU with AVX (or maybe FMA) instructions, and 5 of mine are too old. So I got 3 aaam tasks, one on an i5-8600K which works ok. Two on a Ryzen 9 3900XT, which both work ok. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 12,116,986 RAC: 7,326 |
From what i could understand his tasks do not fail, but some run for 30 hours before completing.That is a fail. If they run 30 hours, it means no calculations are actually being done. I assume something times out. |
dcdc Send message Joined: 3 Nov 05 Posts: 1832 Credit: 119,860,059 RAC: 5,566 |
Boinctasks is helpful to show any tasks where the CPU usage had dropped to near 0. I find this happens on some machines more than others but I'm not sure why. Windows seems more problematic than Linux. Typically, I find that VirtualBox tasks that have run for more than 10hrs are broken and need aborting. Unfortunately, that often also triggers the project to stop you getting more VB tasks until you click the Allow button again. |
Bryn Mawr Send message Joined: 26 Dec 18 Posts: 402 Credit: 12,294,748 RAC: 4,622 |
Subject: +30 hours to run 8 hr tasks It can take some days for Boinc to get used to your system and how quickly it runs. To help it do so make sure you run the benchmarks. Having said that, Rosetta is different to other projects in that it has fixed length jobs rather than jobs with a fixed amount of work. There are two things that can interfere with that, firstly if the task has a low number of starting points you might run for a shorter time than selected, often 3 hours rather than 8, and secondly if the task takes more than the selected time to run the first iteration of the work as it only checks whether to finish at the end of each iteration. Ach! I forgot Python and it’s failings - yes, this is likely to be vb going to sleep and only pretending to work. |
tullio Send message Joined: 10 May 20 Posts: 63 Credit: 630,125 RAC: 0 |
My last two tasks took 3 hours and 8 minutes and 3 hours and 22 minutes on my Windows 11 Intel i5 and Virtual Box 6.1.32.RAM is 12 GB. Tullio |
kotenok2000 Send message Joined: 22 Feb 11 Posts: 272 Credit: 507,897 RAC: 248 |
I have got connection reset errors several times while sending reply. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org