Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
Previous · 1 . . . 144 · 145 · 146 · 147 · 148 · 149 · 150 . . . 305 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Is that just for now or forever? Because if it is forever, I might as well resign from the project and find another. https://www.sidock.si/sidock/forum_thread.php?id=45#228 Point #3 leads to your idea Point#4 talks about the current stuff I run CurieMarieDock on BOINC + zipped input, checkpoints and progress bar v2.00 for the most part https://www.sidock.si/sidock/server_status.php shows you the progress on the structures they have or are working on. They have their own interface as well like FAH. |
mrhastyrib Send message Joined: 18 Feb 21 Posts: 90 Credit: 2,541,890 RAC: 0 |
I am not getting any Rosetta work on any of my machines, and all of them have a Notice that simply states "Virtualbox not installed." Are these two things related? One of these things is not like the other: "Virtualbox is not installed." That's it. Nothing about why it is needed; why it should be installed; the consequences of not installing it. No links about how to do it. Nothing about equipment or OS requirements. The entitlement and arrogance is astonishing. We're only worth the time for four words. I'm giving up on Rosetta. I'll leave it as a project in case they ever decide to go back, but it's going to be a 1 percenter with SiDock getting the hog's share of resources. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
I am not getting any Rosetta work on any of my machines, and all of them have a Notice that simply states "Virtualbox not installed." Are these two things related? You don't need the latest Vbox because it does not work well with Python, so goto this link and download 5.2.x and after that is installed then install the extension pack. https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Download_Old_Builds_5_2 But I should warn you, these python tasks are massive. The VDI is 9 gigs and will take 10 minutes to download. The RAM requirement per TASK is 7629.39 real RAM and 1003.xx virtual. You can set your run time to whatever you want, keep the 8 or switch to 6. They generate between 126 and 180+ in credits on 6hrs. We said that 4.2 was non Vbox work and that is hit and miss...mostly miss. So Vbox is the only thing that is available now as a long term project here at RAH |
mrhastyrib Send message Joined: 18 Feb 21 Posts: 90 Credit: 2,541,890 RAC: 0 |
I appreciate your replies and your guidance. I'm not going to install and set up that software on my computers just to run Rosetta. I'll move on to SiDock or other projects instead. |
spelger Send message Joined: 5 Oct 09 Posts: 3 Credit: 4,030,759 RAC: 969 |
happy to see that my lack of getting tasks is not just me. too bad VirtBox is needed now. too much bloat on my PC. will spend all time on WCG now. too bad, Rosetta was my favourite out of all projects supported. |
Jim1348 Send message Joined: 19 Jan 06 Posts: 881 Credit: 52,257,545 RAC: 0 |
Rosetta was my favourite out of all projects supported.It is actually good news. It means that they can do more of their work in-house with the new AI techniques. They just need us to do the heavy-lifting on memory-intensive development work. They don't want to pay for all of that memory themselves. |
Falconet Send message Joined: 9 Mar 09 Posts: 354 Credit: 1,247,327 RAC: 2,077 |
|
Falconet Send message Joined: 9 Mar 09 Posts: 354 Credit: 1,247,327 RAC: 2,077 |
Looks like another batch of 4.2 work is available. Looks like there are an extra 1.4 million queued tasks when compared to this morning's 2.2 million Pythons. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
If you hurry, you can get a bit of the action in 4.2. 27,000+ queued up at the moment. 122,000 already processed. Only 1967 people on 4.2 at the moment. That leaves 13 tasks per person to crunch. As for the protein or bio science (non Vbox), then its just FAH, SiDock and WCG outside of the odds and ends here. TACC is a serious hit and miss program. You can go for weeks without getting any work from them. Not worth the time or electricity. It's just stuff they can't run on their supercomputer. I personally do not know of any other projects in protein folding that have work for PC's. |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2129 Credit: 41,390,239 RAC: 14,838 |
Looks like another batch of 4.2 work is available. Yes, but all seem limited to 100 decoys before stopping short, so only running between 1 & 2hrs here. They won't last long at all |
Jean-David Beyer Send message Joined: 2 Nov 05 Posts: 194 Credit: 6,523,505 RAC: 7,452 |
Looks like another batch of 4.2 work is available. Yes it does: Tue 07 Dec 2021 03:10:29 PM EST | Rosetta@home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Tue 07 Dec 2021 03:10:29 PM EST | Rosetta@home | Requesting new tasks for CPU Tue 07 Dec 2021 03:10:33 PM EST | Rosetta@home | Scheduler request completed: got 9 new tasks 1938180 Dec 7 15:10 epha2_site1_3skj_3h_ggraft_1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_2pa9fe3l.zip 1943095 Dec 7 15:10 epha2_site1_3skj_3h_ggraft_1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_6gv2zz0m.zip 1996781 Dec 7 15:10 epha2_site1_3skj_3h_ggraft_1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_8yf2ct8i.zip 1878391 Dec 7 15:10 epha2_site3_3c8x_3h_ggraft_1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_5rx2cb2v.zip 1990560 Dec 7 15:10 epha2_site3_3c8x_3h_ggraft_1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_6mw9rn0b.zip 2165492 Dec 7 15:10 niv_site2_6pd4_3h_ggraft_1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_3me3qk7w.zip 1953078 Dec 7 15:10 niv_site2_6pd4_3h_ggraft_1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_9wm2tx8g.zip 1923515 Dec 7 15:10 nkg2d_site1_4s0u_3h_ggraft_1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_1zj8yf9y.zip 2256771 Dec 7 15:10 nkg2d_site1_4s0u_3h_ggraft_1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_7lu6db8g.zip |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Looks like another batch of 4.2 work is available. An hour or so ago there was just 27K now its up to 29K but the total systems went up. So the average drops to 8 tasks per system. Run time to finish is just around 2hrs even though it shows 8 hrs when running. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Looks like another batch of 4.2 work is available. I still have to keep my project_max in play for when I go back to python. I don't have time to enable app_config and remove it and put it back all the time. |
Jean-David Beyer Send message Joined: 2 Nov 05 Posts: 194 Credit: 6,523,505 RAC: 7,452 |
Yes, but all seem limited to 100 decoys before stopping short, so only running between 1 & 2hrs here. Here too. All mine hit 100 decoys. |
Falconet Send message Joined: 9 Mar 09 Posts: 354 Credit: 1,247,327 RAC: 2,077 |
Yes, 100 decoys. Mine just took much longer because they are running on my AMD 2500u laptop. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Yes, 100 decoys. Mine just took much longer because they are running on my AMD 2500u laptop. DONE :: 100 starting structures 7075.52 cpu seconds This process generated 100 decoys from 100 attempts 196 minutes used |
MStenholm Send message Joined: 18 Apr 20 Posts: 18 Credit: 26,362,090 RAC: 28,943 |
Most countries have 60 minutes per hour and 60 seconds per minute but according to your calculation Belgium have 36 minutes per hour :). I know what you are doing but you have a long live ahead of you and someone ought to snap you out of that misconception. 7075/(60*60) = 1,96 hours, not 196 minutes. 1,96 hour = 1 hour and 0,96*60/100 = 57.6 minutes 60+57.6 =117,6 minutes |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Most countries have 60 minutes per hour and 60 seconds per minute but according to your calculation Belgium have 36 minutes per hour :). I know what you are doing but you have a long live ahead of you and someone ought to snap you out of that misconception. Middle of the night math! LMAO. Thanks for the correction. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Something different...I have been getting some 4.2 stuff and now I am back to Python. Anyone figure out the scheduler routine yet? If I was to up the cores in the app_config (project_max_concurrent) to 3 or 4, would I get all Python or a blend of 4.2 and Python? |
robertmiles Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 1233 Credit: 14,315,264 RAC: 3,180 |
Something different...I have been getting some 4.2 stuff and now I am back to Python. It seems to be a random mix of whatever of available, rather than a schedule. I suspect that it is whatever they are currently teaching their students to create workunits for. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org