Haswell TSX

Message boards : Number crunching : Haswell TSX

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile dcdc

Send message
Joined: 3 Nov 05
Posts: 1829
Credit: 116,611,252
RAC: 77,350
Message 75486 - Posted: 26 Apr 2013, 14:59:53 UTC

Hi All

Does anyone know if Haswell's TSX will be easy for Rosetta to incorporate into their compiler in the future?

I'll need a new PC in the near future and from what I've read so far, I'm torn between the 4770 and 4770k (because of TSX and price difference).

ta
Danny
ID: 75486 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Polian
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Sep 05
Posts: 152
Credit: 10,141,266
RAC: 0
Message 75487 - Posted: 26 Apr 2013, 15:16:24 UTC - in response to Message 75486.  

Hi All

Does anyone know if Haswell's TSX will be easy for Rosetta to incorporate into their compiler in the future?

I'll need a new PC in the near future and from what I've read so far, I'm torn between the 4770 and 4770k (because of TSX and price difference).

ta
Danny


I don't pretend to have a thorough understanding of such things, but if I read correctly, this is mainly aimed at multithreaded applications. Doesn't BOINC just use a series of single threaded applications, assigning one instance to each thread?
ID: 75487 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 75489 - Posted: 26 Apr 2013, 15:45:30 UTC
Last modified: 26 Apr 2013, 15:46:17 UTC

Some BOINC projects have multi-threaded applications. Rosetta@home work units run in a single thread and this allows BOINC Manager to run several work units at the same time of preference settings allow it.

[edit] I take it back, I believe the graphic and watchdog are threads... but they aren't doing the actual task crunching.
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 75489 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile dcdc

Send message
Joined: 3 Nov 05
Posts: 1829
Credit: 116,611,252
RAC: 77,350
Message 75490 - Posted: 26 Apr 2013, 16:32:09 UTC

Ah - thanks - I thought it was basically better prediction within a thread but have just read up on it a bit more and see you're right. Looks like the 4770k is the one to go for then!
ID: 75490 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Chilean
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Oct 05
Posts: 711
Credit: 26,694,507
RAC: 0
Message 75588 - Posted: 9 May 2013, 7:39:46 UTC

I'd get the K version because it's unlocked.
ID: 75588 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Patrick Massey

Send message
Joined: 17 May 13
Posts: 3
Credit: 556,042
RAC: 0
Message 75665 - Posted: 26 May 2013, 1:54:10 UTC - in response to Message 75588.  

I'd get the K version because it's unlocked.


Depends on what you're doing. I haven't read into Haswell too much yet, but with Ivy Bridge the K versions lack features that the non-K has (for example, I do not have PCI passthrough (VT-d) on my 3570K, but I'm not planning on running HyperV or Xen on here so it doesn't matter right now).
"Apollo was astonished, Dionysus thought me mad. But they heard my story further and they wondered and were sad."
ID: 75665 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Haswell TSX



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org