Is it possible to process jobs with 360MB of RAM

Message boards : Number crunching : Is it possible to process jobs with 360MB of RAM

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
cmodyssey

Send message
Joined: 4 Jun 11
Posts: 6
Credit: 32
RAC: 0
Message 70658 - Posted: 28 Jun 2011, 19:25:01 UTC

Hi,

I am trying to process using a virtual server that only has 360MB of memory assigned to it.

Would this be the cause of my BOINC not being given any work units?

Below is a sample of messages.

Thanks in advance.


209: 24-Jun-2011 21:40:39 (low) [rosetta@home] update requested by user
210: 24-Jun-2011 21:40:41 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
211: 24-Jun-2011 21:40:41 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
212: 24-Jun-2011 21:40:44 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
213: 24-Jun-2011 21:40:44 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
214: 24-Jun-2011 21:40:50 (low) [rosetta@home] update requested by user
215: 24-Jun-2011 21:40:50 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
216: 24-Jun-2011 21:40:50 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
217: 24-Jun-2011 21:40:52 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
218: 24-Jun-2011 21:40:52 (low) [rosetta@home] Message from server: Not sending work - last request too recent: 8 sec
219: 24-Jun-2011 21:44:57 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
220: 24-Jun-2011 21:44:57 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
221: 24-Jun-2011 21:45:00 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
222: 24-Jun-2011 21:45:00 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
223: 24-Jun-2011 21:49:07 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
224: 24-Jun-2011 21:49:07 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
225: 24-Jun-2011 21:49:09 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
226: 24-Jun-2011 21:49:09 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
227: 24-Jun-2011 21:53:11 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
228: 24-Jun-2011 21:53:11 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
229: 24-Jun-2011 21:53:14 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
230: 24-Jun-2011 21:53:14 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
231: 24-Jun-2011 21:58:22 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
232: 24-Jun-2011 21:58:22 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
233: 24-Jun-2011 21:58:24 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
234: 24-Jun-2011 21:58:24 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
235: 24-Jun-2011 22:09:43 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
236: 24-Jun-2011 22:09:43 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
237: 24-Jun-2011 22:09:45 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
238: 24-Jun-2011 22:09:45 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
239: 24-Jun-2011 22:35:37 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
240: 24-Jun-2011 22:35:37 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
241: 24-Jun-2011 22:35:39 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
242: 24-Jun-2011 22:35:39 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
243: 24-Jun-2011 22:42:52 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
244: 24-Jun-2011 22:42:52 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
245: 24-Jun-2011 22:43:00 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
246: 24-Jun-2011 22:43:00 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
247: 24-Jun-2011 23:37:43 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
248: 24-Jun-2011 23:37:43 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
249: 24-Jun-2011 23:37:45 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
250: 24-Jun-2011 23:37:45 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
251: 25-Jun-2011 03:46:53 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
252: 25-Jun-2011 03:46:53 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
253: 25-Jun-2011 03:46:59 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
254: 25-Jun-2011 03:46:59 (low) [rosetta@home] Message from server: Project is temporarily shut down for maintenance
255: 25-Jun-2011 04:47:04 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
256: 25-Jun-2011 04:47:04 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
257: 25-Jun-2011 04:47:07 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
258: 25-Jun-2011 04:47:07 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
ID: 70658 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mikey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 06
Posts: 1894
Credit: 8,767,285
RAC: 12,464
Message 70661 - Posted: 29 Jun 2011, 11:30:57 UTC - in response to Message 70658.  

Hi,

I am trying to process using a virtual server that only has 360MB of memory assigned to it.

Would this be the cause of my BOINC not being given any work units?

Below is a sample of messages.

Thanks in advance.


218: 24-Jun-2011 21:40:52 (low) [rosetta@home] Message from server: Not sending work - last request too recent: 8 sec

254: 25-Jun-2011 03:46:59 (low) [rosetta@home] Message from server: Project is temporarily shut down for maintenance


No not that particular group of messages it isn't, line #218 means some are too close together, meaning you are requesting new tasks too close to the last time you asked and the Project Server is automatically slowing you down, no hammering on the door to get in! Line #254 means the Server itself is down for maintenance, meaning no one gets in!

As for low memory it will probably get units but they would process sooooo ssllooww that it may not be worth it! I just checked one of my machine and each unit is taking about 130,000k of memory and then Boinc itself takes another 10,000k or so. That is written kind of funny but probably means 130meg and 10meg so I could be mistaken.
ID: 70661 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
cmodyssey

Send message
Joined: 4 Jun 11
Posts: 6
Credit: 32
RAC: 0
Message 70662 - Posted: 29 Jun 2011, 20:10:08 UTC - in response to Message 70661.  


No not that particular group of messages it isn't, line #218 means some are too close together, meaning you are requesting new tasks too close to the last time you asked and the Project Server is automatically slowing you down, no hammering on the door to get in! Line #254 means the Server itself is down for maintenance, meaning no one gets in!

As for low memory it will probably get units but they would process sooooo ssllooww that it may not be worth it! I just checked one of my machine and each unit is taking about 130,000k of memory and then Boinc itself takes another 10,000k or so. That is written kind of funny but probably means 130meg and 10meg so I could be mistaken.


Hi mikey,

Thanks for taking a look, I have taken another look at messages and below are the ones that have appeared since my last posting.

Do you know what else could cause me being sent no work?

Thanks,

Richard.


259: 25-Jun-2011 09:21:13 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
260: 25-Jun-2011 09:21:13 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
261: 25-Jun-2011 09:21:15 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
262: 25-Jun-2011 09:21:15 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
263: 25-Jun-2011 21:09:21 (low) [] Running CPU benchmarks
264: 25-Jun-2011 21:09:21 (low) [] Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
265: 25-Jun-2011 21:09:53 (low) [] Benchmark results:
266: 25-Jun-2011 21:09:53 (low) [] Number of CPUs: 1
267: 25-Jun-2011 21:09:53 (low) [] 1287 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
268: 25-Jun-2011 21:09:53 (low) [] 3120 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
269: 25-Jun-2011 21:09:54 (low) [] Resuming computation
270: 26-Jun-2011 00:36:05 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
271: 26-Jun-2011 00:36:05 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
272: 26-Jun-2011 00:36:09 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
273: 26-Jun-2011 00:36:09 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
274: 26-Jun-2011 06:11:59 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
275: 26-Jun-2011 06:11:59 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
276: 26-Jun-2011 06:12:07 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
277: 26-Jun-2011 06:12:07 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
278: 27-Jun-2011 03:55:40 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
279: 27-Jun-2011 03:55:40 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
280: 27-Jun-2011 03:55:43 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
281: 27-Jun-2011 03:55:43 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
282: 27-Jun-2011 13:33:23 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
283: 27-Jun-2011 13:33:23 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
284: 27-Jun-2011 13:33:27 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
285: 27-Jun-2011 13:33:27 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
286: 28-Jun-2011 03:04:10 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
287: 28-Jun-2011 03:04:10 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
288: 28-Jun-2011 03:04:16 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
289: 28-Jun-2011 03:04:16 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
290: 28-Jun-2011 05:38:29 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
291: 28-Jun-2011 05:38:29 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
292: 28-Jun-2011 05:38:32 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
293: 28-Jun-2011 05:38:32 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
294: 28-Jun-2011 14:35:58 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
295: 28-Jun-2011 14:35:58 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
296: 28-Jun-2011 14:36:00 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
297: 28-Jun-2011 14:36:00 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
298: 29-Jun-2011 00:34:59 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
299: 29-Jun-2011 00:34:59 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
300: 29-Jun-2011 00:35:07 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
301: 29-Jun-2011 00:35:07 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
302: 29-Jun-2011 16:32:24 (low) [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
303: 29-Jun-2011 16:32:24 (low) [rosetta@home] Requesting new tasks
304: 29-Jun-2011 16:32:30 (low) [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
305: 29-Jun-2011 16:32:30 (medium) [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
ID: 70662 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile dcdc

Send message
Joined: 3 Nov 05
Posts: 1829
Credit: 115,561,500
RAC: 59,108
Message 70664 - Posted: 30 Jun 2011, 9:33:19 UTC

I'm curious how/why you've got a dual-core opteron with so little RAM? Are you running FreeNAS or something similar?

For Rosetta you'll probably need 360MB per core just for Rosetta at times, although it's usually less than that. Do you have any spare RAM slots, is it DDR memory and what country are you in?

Danny
ID: 70664 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mikey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 06
Posts: 1894
Credit: 8,767,285
RAC: 12,464
Message 70665 - Posted: 30 Jun 2011, 11:51:54 UTC - in response to Message 70664.  

I'm curious how/why you've got a dual-core opteron with so little RAM? Are you running FreeNAS or something similar?

For Rosetta you'll probably need 360MB per core just for Rosetta at times, although it's usually less than that. Do you have any spare RAM slots, is it DDR memory and what country are you in?

Danny


It is a virtual environment and he has only given it 360mb.

I just checked one of my machines running Rosetta and it is taking 530mb of disk space for the files, prior to even running Rosie. I wonder if that is the problem. My cache is only 1 day.
ID: 70665 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile dcdc

Send message
Joined: 3 Nov 05
Posts: 1829
Credit: 115,561,500
RAC: 59,108
Message 70666 - Posted: 30 Jun 2011, 12:19:34 UTC - in response to Message 70665.  

I'm curious how/why you've got a dual-core opteron with so little RAM? Are you running FreeNAS or something similar?

For Rosetta you'll probably need 360MB per core just for Rosetta at times, although it's usually less than that. Do you have any spare RAM slots, is it DDR memory and what country are you in?

Danny


It is a virtual environment and he has only given it 360mb.

I just checked one of my machines running Rosetta and it is taking 530mb of disk space for the files, prior to even running Rosie. I wonder if that is the problem. My cache is only 1 day.


Ah! Skim-read it and missed the word 'virtual'!

I guess the options (which might not be options for you) are:
Increase the VM's RAM allocation
Increase the computers RAM to allow the above
Run BOINC/Rosie in a separate VM with more RAM
Run BOINC/Rosie outside the VM in the main OS
ID: 70666 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 70667 - Posted: 30 Jun 2011, 16:52:09 UTC
Last modified: 30 Jun 2011, 16:52:24 UTC

The basic requirements have been changed since I last looked, and now indicates that 1GB is the minimum memory requirement.

But I don't think that's the hard limit, so that's why you got as far as you have. Still, I would expect that the number of work units available for <512MB systems to be limited. As in there may be periods of time where you cannot get work.
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 70667 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
cmodyssey

Send message
Joined: 4 Jun 11
Posts: 6
Credit: 32
RAC: 0
Message 70668 - Posted: 30 Jun 2011, 19:46:45 UTC - in response to Message 70667.  

Hi,

Thank you to everyone for your replies.

It all makes a lot more sense now.

My virtual server provider will be upgrading my RAM to 480MB in mid July, so I'll see if I get some jobs once that happens.

Thanks again,

Richard.
ID: 70668 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Is it possible to process jobs with 360MB of RAM



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org