Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta 2.17
Previous · 1 . . . 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
TimL Send message Joined: 16 Sep 06 Posts: 17 Credit: 15,509,973 RAC: 2 |
FOLD_N_DOCK_YgaP_D2symm_2_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_w_csts_26019_4307_0 ran for over 17 hours (Target run time = 8 hours) then failed with this error. |
robertmiles Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 1234 Credit: 14,338,560 RAC: 1,227 |
Well guess we will have to wait for the Grad student to wake up When I've seen similar error messages, the Norton Internet Security antivirus program was always running in the background (no good way to shut it off other than uninstalling it). Not sure if that's also why I often see the BOINC Manager program lose contact with the rest of BOINC. Do the other people seeing this problem also use Norton Internet Security? |
Ian_D Send message Joined: 21 Sep 05 Posts: 55 Credit: 4,216,173 RAC: 0 |
Nope, will NOT have Norton on any of my machines. |
Jesse Viviano Send message Joined: 14 Jan 10 Posts: 42 Credit: 2,700,472 RAC: 0 |
I just got a validate error on work unit 420544516. Could someone please investigate why the validator failed here? |
Jesse Viviano Send message Joined: 14 Jan 10 Posts: 42 Credit: 2,700,472 RAC: 0 |
I just got a validate error on work unit 420544516. Could someone please investigate why the validator failed here? Oops! That should be result 420544516. The corresponding work unit number is 383771914. |
Speedy Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 163 Credit: 808,337 RAC: 1 |
420656625 FOLD_N_DOCK_dagk_D2symm got Validate state Invalid after CPU time 2010.416 run time meant to be 3 hours. corresponding work unit number 420591203 got after Validate state Invalid after CPU time 3843.709 (has debug message) Have a crunching good day!! |
SafeAggie Send message Joined: 22 Oct 05 Posts: 3 Credit: 458,414 RAC: 0 |
Validate Error: ProteinG_abinitio_SAVE_ALL_OUT_design_relax_g056_009_26017_78 wuid=382515464 resultid=419989702 Validate Error: ProteinG_abinitio_SAVE_ALL_OUT_design_relax_g056_010_26017_78 wuid=382515501 resultid=419989703 |
.clair. Send message Joined: 2 Jan 07 Posts: 274 Credit: 26,399,595 RAC: 0 |
Validate error -ProteinG_abinitio_SAVE_ALL_OUT_design_relax_g061_005_26530_180_0 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=420705463 |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Error Message: - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Out Of Memory (C++ Exception) (0xe06d7363) at address 0x7C812AFB Wingman also had the same problem with a little longer run time. Tasks: FOLD_N_DOCK_2kqt_D2symm_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_26674_9746_0 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=421054105 FOLD_N_DOCK_2kqt_D2symm_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_26674_1528_0 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=420870386 FOLD_N_DOCK_dagk_D2symm_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_26520_9259_1 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=420803687 |
.clair. Send message Joined: 2 Jan 07 Posts: 274 Credit: 26,399,595 RAC: 0 |
Validate error - ProteinG_abinitio_SAVE_ALL_OUT_design_relax_g049_008_26508_177 Both of us that crunched this unit got this error https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=383720482 |
robertmiles Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 1234 Credit: 14,338,560 RAC: 1,227 |
Another workunit that appeared to stop using any CPU time at all shortly after a checkpoint, but BOINC thought it was still running for about 2 more days elapsed: pred_ECH19_lr19a_189_0003_nh.pdb_26473_588_0 However, it eventually decided that it had gone past a time limit and engaged the BOINC debugger. Could there be a problem with the BOINC debugger announcing that it is finished, and the workunit should be marked as ended? Also, the listing of my results does not appear to contain any information on which version of minirosetta was used. 2.17 is the latest version, so I'm assuming that one. Not sure if the Tthrottle add-on I'm using to prevent my computer from overheating has any effect on this problem. |
svincent Send message Joined: 30 Dec 05 Posts: 219 Credit: 12,120,035 RAC: 0 |
Task 426111314 ( lysozyme_var_quota_8_15_noH_SAVE_ALL_OUT_27153_445_0 ) failed immediately on Mac. ERROR: ERROR: FragmentIO: could not open file q-noHom.frags.15mers.gz ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/fragment/FragmentIO.cc line: 258 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> |
.clair. Send message Joined: 2 Jan 07 Posts: 274 Credit: 26,399,595 RAC: 0 |
Compute error after 3 seconds lysozyme_var_dis_8_15_SAVE_ALL_OUT_27136_429_0 both of us got the same error ERROR: ERROR: FragmentIO: could not open file cs-lys.15mers.gz ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/fragment/FragmentIO.cc line: 258 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out called boinc_finish https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=388396144 |
Dean Costello Send message Joined: 8 Feb 11 Posts: 4 Credit: 21,658,356 RAC: 2,497 |
Hello, I hate to leave this message because it seems like a problem that has already been answered somewhere, but I can't find it. Here's the thing: I get the following error on my new iMac running a new version of BOINC (6.12.26) Wed Jun 8 18:35:23 2011 | rosetta@home | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Wed Jun 8 18:35:23 2011 | rosetta@home | Reporting 27 completed tasks, requesting new tasks for CPU Wed Jun 8 18:35:23 2011 | | [error] Can't create HTTP response output file sched_reply_boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta.xml Wed Jun 8 18:35:23 2011 | rosetta@home | Scheduler request initialization failed: fopen() failed Any ideas on this? - Dean Costello |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
From the sound of it, the network is fine and the reply is coming back... but the BOINC Core client is unable to create a new file to write a copy of the response to. So either disk is full, or permissions are not correct to do so. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Dean Costello Send message Joined: 8 Feb 11 Posts: 4 Credit: 21,658,356 RAC: 2,497 |
>From the sound of it, the network is fine and the reply is coming back... but the BOINC Core client is >unable to create a new file to write a copy of the response to. Thanks for getting back to me. For further information, the Seti and Climate Prediction projects seem to be uploading/downloading as they normally do. > So either disk is full, or permissions are not correct to do so. I have a dab less than a TB free, so I don't think that it's a disk error. So, how do I address the permission issue? Thank you for your help. - Dean Costello |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Dean, I found this thread that describes a possible scenario... but if other projects are working that doesn't sound like the problem. I've never heard of such a thing before. Since it doesn't seen related to the minirosetta v2.17 (the topic of this thread), if the info. in that link doesn't help, please open a new thread on the Number Crunching board to describe and discuss the issue further. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Dean Costello Send message Joined: 8 Feb 11 Posts: 4 Credit: 21,658,356 RAC: 2,497 |
Again, thanks for getting back in touch. I took a look at the referenced thread, and it seems that it is more associated with the PC and system directories than anything else, so I don't think that it is applicable to my mighty iMac. I'll go ahead and open it up to the number crunching crowd and see what happens. Appreciate the information. - Dean Costello |
beenie210772 Send message Joined: 20 Jan 06 Posts: 1 Credit: 6,777,038 RAC: 1,385 |
Not sure if this is a problem with the work units or a server problem but i've got 6 units that are failing to report & update, all i keep getting in the log is Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. If it's of any use the offending units are as follows :- M50_boinc_NH_restraints_abrelax_cs_frags_tex_IGNORE_THE_REST_26671_153491 M50_boinc_NH_restraints_abrelax_cs_frags_tex_IGNORE_THE REST_26671_164636 M50_boinc_NH_restraints_abrelax_cs_frags_tex_IGNORE_THE_REST_26671_172575 heIF5_NTD_boinc_rosetta_cm_abrelax_cs_frags_hari_IGNORE_THE_REST_26734_168415 heIF5_NTD_boinc_rosetta_cm_abrelax_cs_frags_hari_IGNORE_THE_REST_26734_174250 heIF5_NTD_boinc_rosetta_cm_abrelax_cs_frags_hari_IGNORE_THE_REST_26734_180738 thanks in advance for any help |
Rabinovitch Send message Joined: 28 Apr 07 Posts: 28 Credit: 5,439,728 RAC: 0 |
Please someone tell why this application create 4 (!) processes (under Linux) with memory consumption same as one process under Windows? Thus it needs 4 times more RAM space under Linux to process the WU comparing to Windows! It's very prodigally and I want to solve this bug ('cause it can't be a legal option by design). From Siberia with love! |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
minirosetta 2.17
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org