robert, did those happen to get lower then expected credit? Were they for mini version 2.0? Did they have the double headers? Could you please link a few? Perhaps in the 2.0 thread?

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense

Hi.

I think the 99/100 limit was removed a few app updates back, i've noticed

tasks going well over for a while and reported it as such in past threads.

Like so you see.

======================================================
DONE :: 112 starting structures 14297.2 cpu seconds
This process generated 112 decoys from 112 attempts
======================================================

One of the staff that knows might want to chip in!

---

And here's another i just finished, no problem.

======================================================
DONE :: 135 starting structures 14232.2 cpu seconds
This process generated 135 decoys from 135 attempts
======================================================

---

Did those happen to get lower then expected credit? Were they for mini version 2.0? Did they have the double headers? Could you please link a few? Perhaps in the 2.0 thread?

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense

Did those happen to get lower then expected credit? Were they for mini version 2.0? Did they have the double headers? Could you please link a few? Perhaps in the 2.0 thread?

Mod Sense.

O.K. I'll have a look.

---

robert, did those happen to get lower then expected credit? Were they for mini version 2.0? Did they have the double headers? Could you please link a few? Perhaps in the 2.0 thread?

They got lower credit only if they finished in less than the usual CPU time.

They were for Minirosetta 2.00.

I'm not sure what you mean by double headers.

Not all of them had redo_rama in the names, now that I notice.

I'll post a list in the 2.00 thread.