No WU download anymore ?

Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : No WU download anymore ?

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Grutte Pier [Wa Oars]~MAB The Frisian
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Nov 05
Posts: 87
Credit: 497,588
RAC: 0
Message 4186 - Posted: 24 Nov 2005, 20:43:55 UTC
Last modified: 24 Nov 2005, 20:53:10 UTC

Been running R@H now for over a fortnight and always had a full queue.
Today however, I'm running out of WU's on my two machines at home.
One of them has work for only 12 half a day left.
Anyone knows what the problem can be and perhaps has a solution ?

Connect to network about every
(determines size of work cache; maximum 10 days) 5 days

ID: 4186 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Honza

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 05
Posts: 48
Credit: 173,517
RAC: 0
Message 4187 - Posted: 24 Nov 2005, 21:06:02 UTC

Any other projects attached? You may check Long Term Debt then...
Does "running out" mean you are empty of that the queue is close to empty (e.g some WUs are still left).

I'm running Rosetta on AMD X2 (second core in on CPDN SpinUp) and have Connect to network about every 0.1 days. Only one WUs sits in queue but Rosetta is so stable, that I never got problem immediatelly getting new one when it is finished with the ongiong one...
ID: 4187 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Grutte Pier [Wa Oars]~MAB The Frisian
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Nov 05
Posts: 87
Credit: 497,588
RAC: 0
Message 4188 - Posted: 24 Nov 2005, 21:10:46 UTC - in response to Message 4187.  

Any other projects attached? You may check Long Term Debt then...
Does "running out" mean you are empty of that the queue is close to empty (e.g some WUs are still left).

I'm running Rosetta on AMD X2 (second core in on CPDN SpinUp) and have Connect to network about every 0.1 days. Only one WUs sits in queue but Rosetta is so stable, that I never got problem immediatelly getting new one when it is finished with the ongiong one...


This machine is running one (30% done) and 4 left to crunch on.
After that the queue is empty.
My other machine at home has one running(80% done) and 3 left.
Before I always had enough for 2 days.
No other projects attached.

ID: 4188 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile hob.
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Nov 05
Posts: 64
Credit: 250,683
RAC: 0
Message 4189 - Posted: 24 Nov 2005, 21:32:12 UTC

in general preferences ............have you changed this setting to less time ??

Network usage
Connect to network about every
(determines size of work cache; maximum 10 days) 2 days
46 years dc so far

join team FaDbeens
join us

ID: 4189 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Grutte Pier [Wa Oars]~MAB The Frisian
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Nov 05
Posts: 87
Credit: 497,588
RAC: 0
Message 4192 - Posted: 24 Nov 2005, 21:39:13 UTC - in response to Message 4189.  

in general preferences ............have you changed this setting to less time ??

Network usage
Connect to network about every
(determines size of work cache; maximum 10 days) 2 days

As I stated below it was 2 days.
Before I always had enough for 2 days.



ID: 4192 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile hob.
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Nov 05
Posts: 64
Credit: 250,683
RAC: 0
Message 4194 - Posted: 24 Nov 2005, 21:50:31 UTC - in response to Message 4192.  

in general preferences ............have you changed this setting to less time ??

Network usage
Connect to network about every
(determines size of work cache; maximum 10 days) 2 days

As I stated below it was 2 days.
Before I always had enough for 2 days.




there are seperate preferences for......... school - home - work

have you checked all of them ?

46 years dc so far

join team FaDbeens
join us

ID: 4194 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Grutte Pier [Wa Oars]~MAB The Frisian
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Nov 05
Posts: 87
Credit: 497,588
RAC: 0
Message 4195 - Posted: 24 Nov 2005, 21:56:17 UTC - in response to Message 4194.  
Last modified: 24 Nov 2005, 22:06:35 UTC


ID: 4195 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
hugothehermit

Send message
Joined: 26 Sep 05
Posts: 238
Credit: 314,893
RAC: 0
Message 4216 - Posted: 25 Nov 2005, 3:24:35 UTC
Last modified: 25 Nov 2005, 3:27:01 UTC


ID: 4216 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Grutte Pier [Wa Oars]~MAB The Frisian
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Nov 05
Posts: 87
Credit: 497,588
RAC: 0
Message 4236 - Posted: 25 Nov 2005, 7:27:00 UTC
Last modified: 25 Nov 2005, 7:27:18 UTC

Checked it and he first red message is "Checksum of signature error for 1di2.pdb.gz" and than a lot of "unrecoverable errors for result 1di2_abrelax_rand_len10_jit02_omega_sim_XXXXX"
And this I've had for several times, but now it seems it's ok.
We'll see if it stays this way.
At least, my machines can keep crunching.

ID: 4236 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile FZB

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 84
Credit: 4,948,999
RAC: 0
Message 4238 - Posted: 25 Nov 2005, 8:02:31 UTC

there was a serie of wu's that had a bad checksum due to some changes earlier this week, you propably saw some of those. the new ones are ok again, so you should not be too worried
--
Florian
www.domplatz1.de
ID: 4238 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile dgnuff
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 05
Posts: 350
Credit: 24,773,605
RAC: 0
Message 4279 - Posted: 25 Nov 2005, 20:03:50 UTC - in response to Message 4238.  

there was a serie of wu's that had a bad checksum due to some changes earlier this week, you propably saw some of those. the new ones are ok again, so you should not be too worried


Yup. I had a flock of those guys show up on one of my systems here. Spooked me for a minute, till I remembered about this issue. It seems to have worked out now, there's an appropriate number of WU's in the queue, ready to rock and roll.
ID: 4279 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Darkhorse99

Send message
Joined: 5 Nov 05
Posts: 1
Credit: 225,720
RAC: 0
Message 4299 - Posted: 25 Nov 2005, 22:33:05 UTC - in response to Message 4279.  

I've noticed that my linux box seems to run out of work. The log says:

2005-11-25 22:20:55 [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi
2005-11-25 22:20:55 [rosetta@home] Reason: To fetch work
2005-11-25 22:20:55 [rosetta@home] Requesting 8640 seconds of new work
2005-11-25 22:21:00 [rosetta@home] Scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi succeeded
2005-11-25 22:21:00 [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
2005-11-25 22:21:00 [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
2005-11-25 22:21:00 [rosetta@home] Message from server: (there was work for other platforms)
2005-11-25 22:21:00 [rosetta@home] Message from server: (there was work for other platforms)
2005-11-25 22:21:00 [rosetta@home] No work from project
2005-11-25 22:21:00 [rosetta@home] No work from project
2005-11-25 22:28:34 [---] request_reschedule_cpus: project op

ID: 4299 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
hugothehermit

Send message
Joined: 26 Sep 05
Posts: 238
Credit: 314,893
RAC: 0
Message 4323 - Posted: 26 Nov 2005, 7:51:12 UTC
Last modified: 26 Nov 2005, 7:56:31 UTC

I've noticed that my linux box seems to run out of work. The log says:

2005-11-25 22:20:55 [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi
2005-11-25 22:20:55 [rosetta@home] Reason: To fetch work
2005-11-25 22:20:55 [rosetta@home] Requesting 8640 seconds of new work
2005-11-25 22:21:00 [rosetta@home] Scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi succeeded
2005-11-25 22:21:00 [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
2005-11-25 22:21:00 [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
2005-11-25 22:21:00 [rosetta@home] Message from server: (there was work for other platforms)
2005-11-25 22:21:00 [rosetta@home] Message from server: (there was work for other platforms)
2005-11-25 22:21:00 [rosetta@home] No work from project
2005-11-25 22:21:00 [rosetta@home] No work from project
2005-11-25 22:28:34 [---] request_reschedule_cpus: project op


That's weird, as far as I know that (there was work for other platforms) only happens when they use redundancy (test on the same CPU & OS system) here ?

It may be somthing to do with the roll out of the graphics or maybe they are testing the redundacy option?

edit: fix formatting and added a bit
ID: 4323 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
PCZ

Send message
Joined: 16 Sep 05
Posts: 26
Credit: 2,024,330
RAC: 0
Message 4337 - Posted: 26 Nov 2005, 10:42:10 UTC

Something was up with the linux work Q last night.
A lot of my PC's had run out of work and had the message about there being work for other platforms.
The few Windows boxes i have were all fine.
A really bad effect of there failure to get any work was that the clients had all backed off for 24 hrs. :)

I am going to increase the connect to setting a bit to create more of a buffer
incase this happens again.



ID: 4337 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile dgnuff
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 05
Posts: 350
Credit: 24,773,605
RAC: 0
Message 4366 - Posted: 26 Nov 2005, 16:50:35 UTC - in response to Message 4337.  

Something was up with the linux work Q last night.
A lot of my PC's had run out of work and had the message about there being work for other platforms.
The few Windows boxes i have were all fine.
A really bad effect of there failure to get any work was that the clients had all backed off for 24 hrs. :)

I am going to increase the connect to setting a bit to create more of a buffer
incase this happens again.




Great minds think alike. :)

I notioced that Rosetta has a wonderfully long completion deadline, so I increased the connect time to once every seven days. I generally do a manual update once a day, but it does mean that I have a much lower risk of running out of work.

ID: 4366 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : No WU download anymore ?



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org