Report long-running models here

Message boards : Number crunching : Report long-running models here

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 . . . 14 · Next

AuthorMessage
karlandellie

Send message
Joined: 25 Sep 07
Posts: 1
Credit: 39,393
RAC: 0
Message 59198 - Posted: 31 Jan 2009, 11:16:10 UTC

I am currently crunching abinitio_abrelax_nohomfrag_129_B_2hkvA_6224_3670 so far the CPU time is 29:49:50 and it is still crunching but seemes to have slowed at 99.44%

I am using
Windows XP 1.8 GHZ
BOINC 6.4.5
Rosetta Mini 1.47
ID: 59198 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 59204 - Posted: 31 Jan 2009, 16:09:13 UTC
Last modified: 31 Jan 2009, 16:10:14 UTC

karlandellie please abort that one. The newer version of Rosetta should resolve such problems in the future.

[edit] looks like the watchdog already did that for you. The task has reported back.
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 59204 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
lusvladimir

Send message
Joined: 18 Oct 05
Posts: 12
Credit: 1,784,854
RAC: 0
Message 59206 - Posted: 31 Jan 2009, 18:35:57 UTC

This WU stopped after preferred runtime (1hrs) + 4hrs
Debian Linux
Boinc 6.2.14
Rosetta Mini 1.54

1nkuA_BOINC_MPZN_with_zinc_abrelax_cs_frags_6231_156556_0
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=224365694
CPU Time: 18255.47

1nkuA_BOINC_MPZN_with_zinc_abrelax_cs_frags_6231_113531_0
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=224061637
CPU Time: 18444.31

1nkuA_BOINC_MPZN_with_zinc_abrelax_cs_frags_6231_113176_0
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=224058752
CPU Time: 18159.49

stderr out:

...
End of unzipping.
Setting database description ...
Setting up checkpointing ...
Setting up folding (abrelax) ...
Beginning folding (abrelax) ...
BOINC:: Worker startup.
Starting watchdog...
Watchdog active.
Starting work on structure: _00001
# cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
====>
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Validate state Invalid
ID: 59206 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Fishead

Send message
Joined: 3 Sep 08
Posts: 7
Credit: 89,566
RAC: 0
Message 59215 - Posted: 1 Feb 2009, 9:50:25 UTC

Looks like I've got a similar problem like Aegis, with minirosetta version 1.47.

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=204036661

Preferences are 6 hours as well, it's been running for about 6 hours 45 min now.
Like Aegis' WU, it is still at model 1 and the Accepted window has been showing the same folding for some time. However, the Searching window displays a constantly changing, high detail folding. Again, these changes doesn't seem to count as a full steps.

Low energy is at -2.92..., Accepted engery is 17.71...

I can't tell you anything about the memory it uses, though.
ID: 59215 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
model500
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Oct 08
Posts: 12
Credit: 1,254,422
RAC: 0
Message 59481 - Posted: 9 Feb 2009, 15:11:25 UTC

One of my systems is saying a run time of 56-72 hours for current and new work units when it usually take 3ish hours per WU. Should I await the results before posting here?
ID: 59481 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 59484 - Posted: 9 Feb 2009, 16:43:27 UTC

RichT, the newest BOINC clients are having some serious problems calculating their duration correction factors.

Don't worry. They won't take any longer then they used to to actually complete.
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 59484 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Paul D. Buck

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 815
Credit: 1,812,737
RAC: 0
Message 59488 - Posted: 9 Feb 2009, 18:44:02 UTC - in response to Message 59484.  

RichT, the newest BOINC clients are having some serious problems calculating their duration correction factors.

Don't worry. They won't take any longer then they used to to actually complete.


The problem is with skewed DCF you can eventually lose the ability to get work or maintain a queue of an appropriate size.
ID: 59488 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile robertmiles

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 08
Posts: 1218
Credit: 13,366,970
RAC: 66
Message 59685 - Posted: 20 Feb 2009, 16:17:15 UTC

ID: 59685 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile AdeB
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Dec 06
Posts: 45
Credit: 4,422,404
RAC: 7
Message 59760 - Posted: 23 Feb 2009, 17:18:44 UTC

Preferred runtime + 4 hrs for workunit loopbuild_mamaln_ideal_hb_t312__IGNORE_THE_REST_1zjc_1_7634_42_0.

stderr out:
...
BOINC:: Worker startup. 
Starting watchdog...
Watchdog active.
# cpu_run_time_pref: 43200
Hbond tripped.
====>
called boinc_finish
...


AdeB

ID: 59760 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile AdeB
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Dec 06
Posts: 45
Credit: 4,422,404
RAC: 7
Message 59804 - Posted: 25 Feb 2009, 20:13:36 UTC

ID: 59804 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile robertmiles

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 08
Posts: 1218
Credit: 13,366,970
RAC: 66
Message 59849 - Posted: 27 Feb 2009, 13:38:29 UTC

I'm currently requesting 12-hour workunits, and got one that decided this was only enough time to complete 2 decoys:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=211096685

I'm running BOINC 6.2.28 under Vista SP1 with an AMD dual-core CPU.
ID: 59849 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile robertmiles

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 08
Posts: 1218
Credit: 13,366,970
RAC: 66
Message 59871 - Posted: 28 Feb 2009, 13:37:26 UTC - in response to Message 59685.  

ID: 59871 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile robertmiles

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 08
Posts: 1218
Credit: 13,366,970
RAC: 66
Message 59966 - Posted: 4 Mar 2009, 14:38:02 UTC

ID: 59966 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile robertmiles

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 08
Posts: 1218
Credit: 13,366,970
RAC: 66
Message 60170 - Posted: 16 Mar 2009, 14:23:14 UTC

A workunit with at least one slow model:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=235592155

I request 12-hour workunits; this one completed only 4 decoys.
ID: 60170 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile robertmiles

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 08
Posts: 1218
Credit: 13,366,970
RAC: 66
Message 60253 - Posted: 21 Mar 2009, 13:35:15 UTC

Only one decoy, even for a 12-hour workunit:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=236831326
ID: 60253 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile robertmiles

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 08
Posts: 1218
Credit: 13,366,970
RAC: 66
Message 60317 - Posted: 25 Mar 2009, 14:01:50 UTC

ID: 60317 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile robertmiles

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 08
Posts: 1218
Credit: 13,366,970
RAC: 66
Message 60370 - Posted: 29 Mar 2009, 13:36:31 UTC

ID: 60370 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Rifleman

Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 08
Posts: 17
Credit: 139,408
RAC: 0
Message 60428 - Posted: 1 Apr 2009, 5:52:15 UTC

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=239774765

19 credits? Just because this unit was more difficult to generate a decoy? Pretty rough for 12 hours work.
ID: 60428 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
tralala

Send message
Joined: 8 Apr 06
Posts: 376
Credit: 581,806
RAC: 0
Message 60433 - Posted: 1 Apr 2009, 18:18:54 UTC - in response to Message 60428.  

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=239774765

19 credits? Just because this unit was more difficult to generate a decoy? Pretty rough for 12 hours work.


This is one WU for this thread
ID: 60433 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Hammeh

Send message
Joined: 11 Nov 08
Posts: 63
Credit: 211,283
RAC: 0
Message 60610 - Posted: 12 Apr 2009, 8:19:00 UTC

ccf_cheat_allmulti_1.0_chunk_1_8_hb_t326__IGNORE_THE_REST_2GHRA_8_9981_104_0 using minirosetta version 154

Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bit
3GB RAM

Running for over 7 hours, scan runtime set to 3 hours.

No link to WU as yet, it is still running.
ID: 60610 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 . . . 14 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Report long-running models here



©2023 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org