still unable to merge

Author	Message
hugo75 Send message Joined: 7 Dec 05 Posts: 1 Credit: 496,557 RAC: 0	Message 50172 - Posted: 29 Dec 2007, 21:33:12 UTC I was hoping the new "Merge computers by name" function would finally allow me to merge one of my hosts that was duplicated several BOINC versions ago, due to differences in the processor string (one of the hosts has "[fpu tsc sse mmx]" tacked onto the end, the other does not. Unfortunately, I'm still getting the error: Can't merge host 261762 into 543231 - they're incompatible What gives? I would have thought this should work if it's simply merging by host name? ID: 50172 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

dcdc Send message Joined: 3 Nov 05 Posts: 1832 Credit: 119,860,059 RAC: 3,073	Message 50173 - Posted: 29 Dec 2007, 22:05:13 UTC it's not just by host name- it's more lenient than the previous version was but it still requires certain consistencies. Couldn't tell you what they are though... ID: 50173 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Snider Send message Joined: 14 Mar 06 Posts: 8 Credit: 603,443 RAC: 0	Message 50174 - Posted: 29 Dec 2007, 22:13:09 UTC - in response to Message 50173. It appears that the oldest created host is LOST when merging. It would have been nice after the merge to have the hosts show the ORIGINAL create/join date rather than the most recent. ID: 50174 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Keck_Komputers Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 211 Credit: 4,246,150 RAC: 0	Message 50179 - Posted: 30 Dec 2007, 9:28:19 UTC - in response to Message 50174. It appears that the oldest created host is LOST when merging. It would have been nice after the merge to have the hosts show the ORIGINAL create/join date rather than the most recent. It has always been that way. There is less chance of problems this way than trying to save the old number. BOINC WIKI BOINCing since 2002/12/8 ID: 50179 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Snider Send message Joined: 14 Mar 06 Posts: 8 Credit: 603,443 RAC: 0	Message 50253 - Posted: 2 Jan 2008, 5:51:51 UTC - in response to Message 50179. It has always been that way. There is less chance of problems this way than trying to save the old number. Host number, I can understand. However, the OLDEST creation date should be maintained so users knows when that host originally joined project. ID: 50253 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0	Message 50256 - Posted: 2 Jan 2008, 11:42:14 UTC well that is a BOINC problem, not a project one, so go to the boinc forums for that1 ID: 50256 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote