Seems like the Top Teams stats are really messed up. Team RAC is less than the first user. Has there been a change in how the stats are calculated?

Seems like the Top Teams stats are really messed up. Team RAC is less than the first user. Has there been a change in how the stats are calculated?

the only way i can think of is that 1 of the 2 numbers is wrong/old/not updated since a while cause therese no way that if you count everything and devide by the number of members of that team there is gonna come out 13,000+
and since the number 1 member of that team Boinc@austria i belive has 16,000+ 1 of the 2 numbers need to be wrong

Seems like the Top Teams stats are really messed up. Team RAC is less than the first user. Has there been a change in how the stats are calculated?

It's not only the team stats, it's the individual stats too. I posted something about it last week, and it's been ignored. The situation continues, and the project people won't even acknowledge it.

Hm, let's see, we're running beta apps that are buggy, wus are failing and we're getting validate errors, wus are getting stuck, statisics are messed up, and nobody from the project is saying anything about it? Hey, is this Seti@home?

Xaak


Join Us

---

XaaK

Is it that they don't value our input... or is something screwed up and they are too busy fixing the problem to take the time to respond to our complaint?

Some people may think, "I should move my computers to a project that cares", but that really isn't fair, since really we don't know what is going on. However, it would be nice if the Rosetta Home page would acknowledge that there is still an issue and that they are aware of it and a working on it...

My 2 Canadian cents worth!

P.S. I'm still loyal to Rosetta

[quoted]
It's not only the team stats, it's the individual stats too. I posted something about it last week, and it's been ignored. The situation continues, and the project people won't even acknowledge it.

Hm, let's see, we're running beta apps that are buggy, wus are failing and we're getting validate errors, wus are getting stuck, statisics are messed up, and nobody from the project is saying anything about it? Hey, is this Seti@home?

Xaak
[/quote]

---

Is it that they don't value our input... or is something screwed up and they are too busy fixing the problem to take the time to respond to our complaint?

Some people may think, "I should move my computers to a project that cares", but that really isn't fair, since really we don't know what is going on. However, it would be nice if the Rosetta Home page would acknowledge that there is still an issue and that they are aware of it and a working on it...

My 2 Canadian cents worth!

P.S. I'm still loyal to Rosetta

I'm not asking for miracles, just to know that someone understands there's a problem, and that it'll eventually get addressed. I'm not going anywhere either (yet) ;-). But the first sign of a project going south is lack of communication.



Join Us

---

XaaK

The incorrect RAC was caused by firing up two validators to help with the backlog caused by the hardware failure earlier this month. I'm pretty sure it has been fixed now. I'll look into why it effected the RAC so it doesn't happen again if we need more validators running. Sorry it took a while before I realized this was happening.

The incorrect RAC was caused by firing up two validators to help with the backlog caused by the hardware failure earlier this month. I'm pretty sure it has been fixed now. I'll look into why it effected the RAC so it doesn't happen again if we need more validators running. Sorry it took a while before I realized this was happening.

Thank you :-).

---

XaaK

Thanks David!

The incorrect RAC was caused by firing up two validators to help with the backlog caused by the hardware failure earlier this month. I'm pretty sure it has been fixed now. I'll look into why it effected the RAC so it doesn't happen again if we need more validators running. Sorry it took a while before I realized this was happening.

---