Problems with Rosetta version 5.68 and 5.70

Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.68 and 5.70

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next

AuthorMessage
Metalsmith

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 07
Posts: 6
Credit: 8,271
RAC: 0
Message 43458 - Posted: 9 Jul 2007, 21:59:00 UTC - in response to Message 42679.  

Unfortunately, we can't label the new app plain "rosetta" because we need to keep the name of the stable app "rosetta". But I agree, maybe "rosetta_new" would be a better name than "rosetta_beta"... I'll talk to David K. about this.

Hi Rhiju

I've just noticed the new 5.70 tasks show as 'rosetta beta 5.70' in Boinc Manager & BoincView - i'm sure that will confuse some people so it's probably worth changing that label if you can!




The new beta is hanging on my machine. Just sits there saying it's running, but doing nothing.

Metalsmith
ID: 43458 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 43462 - Posted: 9 Jul 2007, 22:31:01 UTC

Metalsmith: More detail will be needed to help with your question.

I see you are running on a Mac.

Where are you looking for an indication it is running? Is that the status shown in the BOINC Manager tasks tab? Or the status shown by the Mac OS?

How do you know it is doing nothing? Is Mac OS showing the Rosetta task with a zero CPU %? Or is BOINC Manager showing the same CPU time?
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 43462 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
snooptodd
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Dec 05
Posts: 2
Credit: 1,229,606
RAC: 0
Message 43468 - Posted: 10 Jul 2007, 2:15:58 UTC
Last modified: 10 Jul 2007, 2:19:21 UTC

This work unit froze and I aborted it.
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=90860596
No cpu utilization and cpu time not incrementing. It was using the 1.70 client on a current Ubuntu box.
ID: 43468 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 43478 - Posted: 10 Jul 2007, 14:14:42 UTC
Last modified: 10 Jul 2007, 14:14:50 UTC

Hey snoop. Did the task show a status of "running" in the BOINC Manager tasks tab in the advanced view? Or did it get suspended or "waiting for memory" when CPU time stopped incrementing?
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 43478 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Metalsmith

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 07
Posts: 6
Credit: 8,271
RAC: 0
Message 43482 - Posted: 10 Jul 2007, 15:07:29 UTC - in response to Message 43462.  

Metalsmith: More detail will be needed to help with your question.

I see you are running on a Mac.

Dual 2.33 GHz G5 6Gig RAM

Where are you looking for an indication it is running? Is that the status shown in the BOINC Manager tasks tab? Or the status shown by the Mac OS?

Activity monitor shows SETI burning up both processdors whilst Rosetta is using 0 cycles. In BOINC Manager the % goes up to a certian amount 64% or whatever, and then just stayse there even though the manager states that it is running.

How do you know it is doing nothing?

just a wild guess after observing the same <less than an hour> completion time posted for two days.

Is Mac OS showing the Rosetta task with a zero CPU %? Or is BOINC Manager showing the same CPU time?
Einstein is the one with zero cpu %. Rosetta has a statit cpu time

ID: 43482 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
snooptodd
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Dec 05
Posts: 2
Credit: 1,229,606
RAC: 0
Message 43657 - Posted: 14 Jul 2007, 14:42:16 UTC - in response to Message 43478.  

Hey snoop. Did the task show a status of "running" in the BOINC Manager tasks tab in the advanced view? Or did it get suspended or "waiting for memory" when CPU time stopped incrementing?
The task showed running.

ID: 43657 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
P . P . L .

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 06
Posts: 581
Credit: 4,865,274
RAC: 0
Message 43786 - Posted: 17 Jul 2007, 2:57:44 UTC

I was the second to have a problem with this one, errored after about 1 second.

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=84069006

It was on 5.70B app.

ID: 43786 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 4875
Credit: 4,472,466
RAC: 465
Message 43932 - Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 19:36:49 UTC
Last modified: 19 Jul 2007, 19:37:12 UTC

BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-2tif_-_NATIVE_PAIR_5_44_1_1_BARCODE_R25E_filters_1807_29280_0_0 crashed my system when it was done and attempting to make a gzip file which generated this error in the results found in the above link.


WARNING! attempt to gzip file .cc2tif.out failed: file does not exist.

i got credit for it but it looks like you might not get all your data.
ID: 43932 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Stevea

Send message
Joined: 19 Dec 05
Posts: 50
Credit: 738,655
RAC: 0
Message 44022 - Posted: 21 Jul 2007, 16:21:58 UTC
Last modified: 21 Jul 2007, 16:23:28 UTC

Here's one that never even got started on 2 different rigs.


https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=85064822
BETA = Bahhh

Way too many errors, killing both the credit & RAC.

And I still think the (New and Improved) credit system is not ready for prime time...
ID: 44022 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
DJStarfox

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 07
Posts: 140
Credit: 1,129,165
RAC: 766
Message 44180 - Posted: 24 Jul 2007, 22:30:20 UTC

Both of these results failed when I tried to manually suspend them with BOINC manager. I'm not sure the Rosetta version; perhaps I could check my logs....

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=93923269

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=94623192

My computers are hidden because...it's a long story. I'm running Fedora Core 7 Linux kernel 2.6.21 on an x86_64 (but using the 32-bit version of BOINC).
ID: 44180 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Marcel Koopmans

Send message
Joined: 4 Aug 06
Posts: 8
Credit: 1,134,689
RAC: 0
Message 44297 - Posted: 26 Jul 2007, 9:32:06 UTC

Hello,

I also have many problems on 32 and 64 bit linux.
I run Debian 4.0 amd64 on a Core 2 Duo ( host id = 304690 ).

In the last 30 days I lost over 2 days in computing time!

Till yesterday I run 32bit boinc using extra libs.
Yesterday I did install 64 bit boinc and did a reset of all the projects.
As far as I can see the number of compute errors has not dropped.

I now also run my own scripting to automatically kill and restart boinc.
( if load / core < 90% or > 110% )
And it kills all "rosetta" and "setiathome" processes with init as parent.

Even with these kind of tricks my machine cannot compete with a Window$ installation.

I have the feeling that on macOSX the softawre is getting more stable.

Marcel
ID: 44297 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
DJStarfox

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 07
Posts: 140
Credit: 1,129,165
RAC: 766
Message 44314 - Posted: 26 Jul 2007, 12:17:09 UTC

Got another one crash with Rosetta Beta 5.70:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=95296120

This one crashed with code 193 immediately after my computer became "active" and BOINC tried to pause all the running tasks. Here's the output from BOINC:

2007-07-26 07:41:26 [climateprediction.net] [task_debug] result hadcm3inct_cmuo_1920_160_35869820_1 checkpointed
2007-07-26 07:43:56 [rosetta@home] [task_debug] result 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 checkpointed
2007-07-26 07:44:29 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request: Requested by user
2007-07-26 07:44:29 [SETI@home] Reporting 1 tasks
2007-07-26 07:44:34 [SETI@home] Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 511]
2007-07-26 07:44:34 [SETI@home] Deferring communication for 11 sec
2007-07-26 07:44:34 [SETI@home] Reason: requested by project
2007-07-26 07:47:20 [---] Suspending computation - user is active
2007-07-26 07:47:20 [climateprediction.net] [task_debug] task_state=QUIT_PENDING for hadcm3inct_cmuo_1920_160_35869820_1 from preempt
2007-07-26 07:47:20 [rosetta@home] [task_debug] task_state=QUIT_PENDING for 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 from preempt
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] [task_debug] Process for 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 exited
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] [task_debug] task_state=EXITED for 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 from handle_exited_app
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] Reason: Unrecoverable error for result 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 (process exited with code 193 (0xc1))
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] [task_debug] result state=COMPUTE_ERROR for 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 from CS::report_result_error
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] [task_debug] exit status 193
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] Computation for task 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 finished
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] Output file 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0_0 for task 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 absent
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] [task_debug] result state=COMPUTE_ERROR for 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 from CS::app_finished
Cleaning up graphics data...
Detaching shared memory...
2007-07-26 07:47:22 [climateprediction.net] [task_debug] Process for hadcm3inct_cmuo_1920_160_35869820_1 exited
2007-07-26 07:47:22 [climateprediction.net] [task_debug] task_state=UNINITIALIZED for hadcm3inct_cmuo_1920_160_35869820_1 from handle_exited_app
2007-07-26 07:47:22 [climateprediction.net] [task_debug] exit status 0
ID: 44314 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
DJStarfox

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 07
Posts: 140
Credit: 1,129,165
RAC: 766
Message 44331 - Posted: 26 Jul 2007, 15:08:40 UTC - in response to Message 42920.  

Stacey Baird:

I read that you are running the same 4 project that I am. Seti, Rosetta, ClimatePrediction, and Einstein. Would you please post what your resource shares for each are? I'm trying to find a happy balance between all these project (or perhaps detach from a couple).

Thanks.
ID: 44331 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
DJStarfox

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 07
Posts: 140
Credit: 1,129,165
RAC: 766
Message 44334 - Posted: 26 Jul 2007, 15:33:50 UTC - in response to Message 44314.  

Got another one crash with Rosetta Beta 5.70:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=95296120

This one crashed with code 193 immediately after my computer became "active" and BOINC tried to pause all the running tasks. Here's the output from BOINC:

2007-07-26 07:41:26 [climateprediction.net] [task_debug] result hadcm3inct_cmuo_1920_160_35869820_1 checkpointed
2007-07-26 07:43:56 [rosetta@home] [task_debug] result 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 checkpointed
2007-07-26 07:44:29 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request: Requested by user
2007-07-26 07:44:29 [SETI@home] Reporting 1 tasks
2007-07-26 07:44:34 [SETI@home] Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 511]
2007-07-26 07:44:34 [SETI@home] Deferring communication for 11 sec
2007-07-26 07:44:34 [SETI@home] Reason: requested by project
2007-07-26 07:47:20 [---] Suspending computation - user is active
2007-07-26 07:47:20 [climateprediction.net] [task_debug] task_state=QUIT_PENDING for hadcm3inct_cmuo_1920_160_35869820_1 from preempt
2007-07-26 07:47:20 [rosetta@home] [task_debug] task_state=QUIT_PENDING for 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 from preempt
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] [task_debug] Process for 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 exited
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] [task_debug] task_state=EXITED for 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 from handle_exited_app
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] Reason: Unrecoverable error for result 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 (process exited with code 193 (0xc1))
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] [task_debug] result state=COMPUTE_ERROR for 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 from CS::report_result_error
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] [task_debug] exit status 193
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] Computation for task 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 finished
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] Output file 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0_0 for task 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 absent
2007-07-26 07:47:21 [rosetta@home] [task_debug] result state=COMPUTE_ERROR for 1ten__BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1ten_-frags83__1838_4395_0 from CS::app_finished
Cleaning up graphics data...
Detaching shared memory...
2007-07-26 07:47:22 [climateprediction.net] [task_debug] Process for hadcm3inct_cmuo_1920_160_35869820_1 exited
2007-07-26 07:47:22 [climateprediction.net] [task_debug] task_state=UNINITIALIZED for hadcm3inct_cmuo_1920_160_35869820_1 from handle_exited_app
2007-07-26 07:47:22 [climateprediction.net] [task_debug] exit status 0


Sorry, this error was for Rosetta Beta 5.72. I believe the same thing has happened with 5.70 with previous workunits of mine, so there's still some debugging to do on Linux before 5.72 can be a final release.
ID: 44334 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile TeAm Enterprise
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Sep 05
Posts: 18
Credit: 27,425,088
RAC: 4,359
Message 44437 - Posted: 28 Jul 2007, 15:18:55 UTC

This and several other units hung and cycled for hours and days. Surely the software should be able to detect this. Below is just a snippet of a message repeated every 30 seconds or so for over 8 hours.


[i]7/28/2007 8:04:50 AM|rosetta@home|Task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
7/28/2007 8:04:50 AM|rosetta@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
7/28/2007 8:04:50 AM|rosetta@home|Restarting task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 using rosetta version 568
7/28/2007 8:05:31 AM|rosetta@home|Task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
7/28/2007 8:05:31 AM|rosetta@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
7/28/2007 8:05:31 AM|rosetta@home|Restarting task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 using rosetta version 568
7/28/2007 8:06:13 AM|rosetta@home|Task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
7/28/2007 8:06:13 AM|rosetta@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
7/28/2007 8:06:13 AM|rosetta@home|Restarting task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 using rosetta version 568
7/28/2007 8:06:54 AM|rosetta@home|Task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
7/28/2007 8:06:54 AM|rosetta@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
7/28/2007 8:06:54 AM|rosetta@home|Restarting task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 using rosetta version 568
7/28/2007 8:07:35 AM|rosetta@home|Task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
7/28/2007 8:07:35 AM|rosetta@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
7/28/2007 8:07:35 AM|rosetta@home|Restarting task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 using rosetta version 568
7/28/2007 8:08:16 AM|rosetta@home|Task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
7/28/2007 8:08:16 AM|rosetta@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
7/28/2007 8:08:16 AM|rosetta@home|Restarting task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 using rosetta version 568
7/28/2007 8:08:57 AM|rosetta@home|Task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
7/28/2007 8:08:57 AM|rosetta@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
7/28/2007 8:08:57 AM|rosetta@home|Restarting task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 using rosetta version 568
7/28/2007 8:09:38 AM|rosetta@home|Task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
7/28/2007 8:09:38 AM|rosetta@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
7/28/2007 8:09:38 AM|rosetta@home|Restarting task BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_NATIVE_PAIR_53_75_2_1_filters_1804_18348_0 using rosetta version 568[I]
ID: 44437 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Jack

Send message
Joined: 19 Feb 07
Posts: 11
Credit: 509,469
RAC: 54
Message 44441 - Posted: 28 Jul 2007, 17:53:25 UTC

Latest work unit got stalled for a while. I am sharing time with Rosetta and SETI with a one hour swap timer. At 19:44 the Rosetta work unit pauses while SETI runs for an hour. When Rosetta resumes, it starts over at 18:44. This happens repeatedly. I finally had to suspend the SETI work unit until Rosetta finished.

Rosetta ver 5.68
Job name: BENCH_051207_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-2chf_-_BARCODE_R74_filters_1804_16911_0
Work Unit: 85773166
Result ID: 94765248

ID: 44441 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 44449 - Posted: 28 Jul 2007, 19:48:45 UTC

Jack, suggest you change your general preferences to "leave application in memory while suspended YES". You must have run in to a task that needs more then an hour to reach a checkpoint. This way it will keep things in the swap file and pick up where it left off.
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 44449 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
svincent

Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 05
Posts: 217
Credit: 9,700,108
RAC: 4,239
Message 44502 - Posted: 29 Jul 2007, 23:18:12 UTC

Work unit 86705477 stuck at 65.70% for a day on Rosetta 5.58 on an iMac running 10.4.10 : aborting.


ID: 44502 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile adrianxw
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 05
Posts: 608
Credit: 9,542,961
RAC: 5,444
Message 44512 - Posted: 30 Jul 2007, 7:11:10 UTC

2 crashed wu this morning, one after about 2.5 hours, the otehr after ~35 minutes.

Result ID 96120974
Name BENCH_051207_JUMPING_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1hz6A-_NATIVE_PAIR_7_57_2_1_filters_1858_3126_1
Workunit 84975870
Created 30 Jul 2007 1:12:22 UTC
Sent 30 Jul 2007 1:12:46 UTC
Received 30 Jul 2007 6:59:34 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Client error
Client state Compute error
Exit status 193 (0xc1)
Computer ID 544079
Report deadline 9 Aug 2007 1:12:46 UTC
CPU time 10279.558432
stderr out <core_client_version>5.8.16</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 193 (0xc1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
Graphics are disabled due to configuration...
# cpu_run_time_pref: 10800
# random seed: 2352845
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
Stack trace (20 frames):
[0x8cdfdab]
[0x8cdabdc]
[0xb7f76420]
[0x8b253ce]
[0x8b3229f]
[0x8b51734]
[0x804c638]
[0x85f687a]
[0x8748441]
[0x804e1c6]
[0x8c33bfb]
[0x8942222]
[0x8604c80]
[0x88773f5]
[0x892a2c4]
[0x85c461e]
[0x86ed9a6]
[0x86edac6]
[0x8d43ca4]
[0x8048111]

Exiting...

</stderr_txt>
]]>


Validate state Invalid
Claimed credit 14.8806448917294
Granted credit 0
application version 5.68

----------------------------------------------------

Result ID 96127994
Name 1r69__BOINC_GENERIC__ABRELAX-1r69_-generic__1870_8796_0
Workunit 87041574
Created 30 Jul 2007 2:05:34 UTC
Sent 30 Jul 2007 4:05:31 UTC
Received 30 Jul 2007 6:59:34 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Client error
Client state Compute error
Exit status 193 (0xc1)
Computer ID 544079
Report deadline 9 Aug 2007 4:05:31 UTC
CPU time 2376.856544
stderr out <core_client_version>5.8.16</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 193 (0xc1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
Graphics are disabled due to configuration...
# cpu_run_time_pref: 10800
# random seed: 2191065
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
Stack trace (14 frames):
[0x8d3bd1b]
[0x8d36b4c]
[0xb7f54420]
[0x8ca6153]
[0x8bac6ba]
[0x8bb26c0]
[0x8c8db88]
[0x84b42d8]
[0x80d8651]
[0x85ee9b7]
[0x871c6e3]
[0x871c78e]
[0x8d9fc14]
[0x8048111]

Exiting...

</stderr_txt>
]]>


Validate state Invalid
Claimed credit 3.44072738375063
Granted credit 0
application version 5.72

Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.
ID: 44512 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
DJStarfox

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 07
Posts: 140
Credit: 1,129,165
RAC: 766
Message 44703 - Posted: 5 Aug 2007, 14:45:06 UTC

Riddle me this, Batman.

Rosetta 5.68 when selecting "Suspend" from the Activity menu, suspends the task.
But Rosetta 5.73 task goes into QUIT_PENDING, and again as I've posted several times, does not UNINITIALIZE (remove itself from memory).

My setting for Leave applications in memory while suspended? = no. So, it appears 5.68 does not honor my global settings "sometimes". I do not understand this.

If I kill [pid], the 5.68 workunit restarts at its previous checkpoint as it should.

This is the computer I'm talking about:
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/show_host_detail.php?hostid=565755
ID: 44703 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.68 and 5.70



©2021 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org