Failed download

Message boards : Number crunching : Failed download

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6

AuthorMessage
PUDDIN TAME

Send message
Joined: 3 Oct 06
Posts: 13
Credit: 53,998
RAC: 0
Message 39436 - Posted: 15 Apr 2007, 20:09:50 UTC - in response to Message 39399.  

Not everyone has a large cache or a fall back project, so perhaps there are concerns of wasted (idle) CPU time.

I'm crunching Proteins@Home when my cache is empty.

For crunching protien projects when the que is empty of rosetta I find that Tanpaku is better than protiens@home.

protiens@home writes to you hard drive all the time rather than only at the checkpoints like Rosetta and Tanpaku. That had been mentioned at the protiens@home message boards last year and the people running it said that they wanted it that way and run it like that on all there systems. The way it ran raised the temp. of my hard drive a few degrees but I don't remember how much. I would rather not put the added work on the HD. That is only my opinion about why Tanpaku over protiens@home.



Looking for a good backup project, try malariacontrol

PUDDIN TAME
ID: 39436 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Keith E. Laidig
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 05
Posts: 154
Credit: 117,189,961
RAC: 0
Message 39440 - Posted: 15 Apr 2007, 21:01:44 UTC


fixed. -KEL

ID: 39440 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 5659
Credit: 5,695,445
RAC: 1,982
Message 39445 - Posted: 15 Apr 2007, 21:19:41 UTC - in response to Message 39440.  
Last modified: 15 Apr 2007, 21:33:09 UTC

server lag or something..the files are slow to download or do not download at all.
The other downloads were lagging and only moving at 22Kbps which is unusually slow. Took 13 mins to download 4 files to complete a WU. Not good.

fixed. -KEL


ID: 39445 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sailor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Mar 07
Posts: 75
Credit: 89,192
RAC: 0
Message 39446 - Posted: 15 Apr 2007, 21:32:55 UTC - in response to Message 39445.  

server lag or something..the files are slow to download or do not download at all.
I got a .fasta file that is stuck even after a retry and a update command. Its only 111 bytes, so whats up with this? The other downloads were lagging and only moving at 22Kbps which is unusually slow.

fixed. -KEL



heavy traffic/download requests maybe ? :) be patiant.

gj btw, I wasnt avating the servers to return back online today, thougth more of monday morning.
ID: 39446 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 5659
Credit: 5,695,445
RAC: 1,982
Message 39447 - Posted: 15 Apr 2007, 21:34:16 UTC - in response to Message 39446.  

server lag or something..the files are slow to download or do not download at all.
I got a .fasta file that is stuck even after a retry and a update command. Its only 111 bytes, so whats up with this? The other downloads were lagging and only moving at 22Kbps which is unusually slow.

fixed. -KEL



heavy traffic/download requests maybe ? :) be patiant.

gj btw, I wasnt avating the servers to return back online today, thougth more of monday morning.
<-- yeah! bravo to KJ for checking servers on a sunday.

ID: 39447 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Tim Kunz

Send message
Joined: 27 Dec 05
Posts: 9
Credit: 1,030,537
RAC: 1,466
Message 39450 - Posted: 15 Apr 2007, 21:43:13 UTC - in response to Message 39431.  

There appears to be a number of issues, although downloads seem to be underway again now...

Checkpointing on some workunits is not occurring and average credit per workunit seems to have declined in general.

I'm hoping a new version of the client addresses these and have also deferred work from Rosetta to other projects until resolved.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually, I'm leaving BOINC alone, I am just shutting off new work from Rosetta and leaving all my other projects happy.

With the structure of the Rosetta work units, there are a bunch of files downloading (or trying to download) for each work unit. When the download server is sick (or communications from the download server is sick), all of those files get set up for retries (at various times). That can add a LOT to the noise level (for my workstation, for my proxy server and for the Rosetta download server). While some might view the noise and extra traffic as a salubrious event, I just don't see it that way.

Since I have three or more projects on each on my workstations, shutting down new work with Rosetta simply shifts work to other project which are not engaged in DSSSS (Download Server System Stress Syndrome).

Not sure what threshold was crossed in the past several days to suddenly make the problem as bad as it is. I sort of doubt it is an 'incremental workload' issue -- rather I suspect there is something else at play here. Perhaps something similar to issues identified and resolved by both the SETI and Einstein folks earlier this year.

That being said, it sure would be nice to get some description of the detail of the problem, as, encountering the problem, then checking an all green board on server status is just annoying. Sort of like the 'only good news' handling of events in our political process.



People.

Leave BOINC alone.

It will automatically get new work when work is available.


ID: 39450 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Michael.L

Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 06
Posts: 67
Credit: 31,295
RAC: 0
Message 39455 - Posted: 15 Apr 2007, 22:12:44 UTC

thanks KEL!
Sends a large coffee and donut
ID: 39455 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Michael.L

Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 06
Posts: 67
Credit: 31,295
RAC: 0
Message 39456 - Posted: 15 Apr 2007, 22:13:16 UTC
Last modified: 15 Apr 2007, 22:14:28 UTC

Thanks KEL!
Sends a large coffee and donut. OOPs. sorry about the double post - only one coffee and donut.
ID: 39456 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 5659
Credit: 5,695,445
RAC: 1,982
Message 39461 - Posted: 15 Apr 2007, 23:23:07 UTC - in response to Message 39456.  

i'll pick up the tab on the second one
Thanks KEL!
Sends a large coffee and donut. OOPs. sorry about the double post - only one coffee and donut.


ID: 39461 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6

Message boards : Number crunching : Failed download



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org