How much memory now?

Author	Message
DrSclarn Send message Joined: 26 Sep 05 Posts: 3 Credit: 0 RAC: 0	Message 1909 - Posted: 29 Oct 2005, 13:12:41 UTC Last modified: 29 Oct 2005, 13:20:01 UTC I tried R@H some days back, but found the memory consumption was too much, and so left it at that. Now I hear this: "The rosetta application has been updated on all platforms. The updated versions should have a smaller memory footprint and the OSX version should also run on 10.3.9+." How much is the memory footprint, exactly? ID: 1909 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Rebirther Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 116 Credit: 41,315 RAC: 0	Message 1910 - Posted: 29 Oct 2005, 13:35:46 UTC 65MB RAM per WU now ;) ID: 1910 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rbpeake Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 168 Credit: 247,828 RAC: 0	Message 1911 - Posted: 29 Oct 2005, 13:46:50 UTC - in response to Message 1910. 65MB RAM per WU now ;) I have seen my memory useage on R@h up to about 120mb. However, I am using two 256mb boxes for several days with no problems so far. Regards, Bob P. ID: 1911 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1018 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0	Message 1919 - Posted: 29 Oct 2005, 17:36:11 UTC Keep in mind that the memory usage still depends on the protein and the type of method being tested. ID: 1919 · Rating: 1 · rate: / Reply Quote