My experience with Rosetta WU's

Author	Message
Shaktai Send message Joined: 21 Sep 05 Posts: 56 Credit: 575,419 RAC: 0	Message 509 - Posted: 26 Sep 2005, 3:34:46 UTC - in response to Message 457. Using Linux have only had "Computation errors" and using my Valuable Time I could be giving to an Experiment that will send me info "Why" or "What" I can do to eliviate this Issue.I have nearly 800 RAM and there should not be only Errors,unless Linuxos is not supported? Sluger1138 Linux is definitely supported as there are a lot of Linux boxes completing work. Try posting your detailed errors in the Linux questions and answers section. Some other Linux users may be able to help. Of course David Kim has also said he will look into it when he gets back from vacation, so help is available. (David K, for a guy on vacation you are spending a lot of time on the forum. I am sure folks appreciate it, but don't forget to enjoy yourself some too. Wouldn't be a vacation otherwise. - David R, AKA Shaktai) Team MacNN - The best Macintosh team ever. ID: 509 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Divide Overflow Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 82 Credit: 921,382 RAC: 0	Message 514 - Posted: 26 Sep 2005, 4:39:33 UTC - in response to Message 457. Using Linux have only had "Computation errors" Sluger1138, I brought my system up on linux and tried crunching Rosetta. I haven't had a single problem with any of the five WU's I've done so far. The project definately supports linux platforms. Can you give us a little more information about your system and what's happening when you see these errors occur? ID: 514 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Doug Worrall Send message Joined: 19 Sep 05 Posts: 60 Credit: 58,445 RAC: 0	Message 666 - Posted: 27 Sep 2005, 22:51:10 UTC - in response to Message 457. Mine took about 36 hours on a 1200 mhz AMD with WinXP and 512 ram. Using Linux have only had "Computation errors" and using my Valuable Time I could be giving to an Experiment that will send me info "Why" or "What" I can do to eliviate this Issue. I have nearly 800 RAM and there should not be only Errors,unless Linuxos is not supported? Sluger1138 Fixed Problem and am swimming alomg just fine.Just cannot exit Boinc.Plain and simple.Works great.Love the Project,will become Premiere "Experiment" shortly. Coodos Rosetta Volunteers,Scientists and payed staff.{if there is any}. Great W/U,Happy crunching all Doug Boinc Synergy ID: 666 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Rebirther Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 116 Credit: 41,315 RAC: 0	Message 1170 - Posted: 9 Oct 2005, 15:19:21 UTC New WUs take much more time to finishing, between 6-9h on my P4 3,2 HT. Is there a difference with old ones (3-5h)? ID: 1170 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1018 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0	Message 1174 - Posted: 9 Oct 2005, 15:52:08 UTC Yes, larger protein. ID: 1174 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

yoner Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,581,874 RAC: 0	Message 1183 - Posted: 9 Oct 2005, 19:11:26 UTC Is there any way to increase the "Time to Completion" that the BOINC manager shows for these units now that they are taking twice as long to process? They show up as 4:27:09 on my system, how about doubling the time? This would be alot closer to what the units actually take. ID: 1183 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1018 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0	Message 1185 - Posted: 9 Oct 2005, 19:18:07 UTC What is the name of the workunit? ID: 1185 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

yoner Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,581,874 RAC: 0	Message 1187 - Posted: 9 Oct 2005, 22:36:54 UTC Work units used to take about 3.5-4.5 hours to complete. Last unit 1acf_abrelax_no_cst_08156_0 took about 8-9 hours. current unit 1acf_abrelax_07909_0 is 4:32:03 into unit, 0% complete. ID: 1187 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

yoner Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,581,874 RAC: 0	Message 1188 - Posted: 9 Oct 2005, 22:44:04 UTC Ok, unit just got un-preempted and is running - is at 4:33:37, and 58.33%. seems weird to jump like that... ID: 1188 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

CJSoft UK Send message Joined: 19 Sep 05 Posts: 2 Credit: 3,510 RAC: 0	Message 1279 - Posted: 12 Oct 2005, 6:01:30 UTC - in response to Message 1187. Work units used to take about 3.5-4.5 hours to complete. Last unit 1acf_abrelax_no_cst_08156_0 took about 8-9 hours. current unit 1acf_abrelax_07909_0 is 4:32:03 into unit, 0% complete. They do seem to have gotten longer! ID: 1279 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Webmaster Yoda Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 161 Credit: 162,253 RAC: 0	Message 1280 - Posted: 12 Oct 2005, 7:12:49 UTC Last modified: 12 Oct 2005, 7:17:44 UTC They do seem to have gotten longer! Rosetta's work units vary in length, depending on which protein we're modelling, or that's my understanding of it anyway. I have had some "1acf" units as well and they took quite a long time. But since then I've had "1bmb" work units, which don't take anywhere near as long. The "1pva" ones we had before took very little time (typically 1.5 hours on my Athlon XP 3000+) Takes a bit of getting used to, especially when the progress bar doesn't move for a long time. * Join BOINC@Australia today * ID: 1280 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

STE\/E Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 125 Credit: 3,737,398 RAC: 28,471	Message 1281 - Posted: 12 Oct 2005, 7:13:30 UTC Last modified: 12 Oct 2005, 7:15:40 UTC They do seem to have gotten longer! ========== Yes, it seems any WU's Downloaded from around October 1'st & on are taking 2-4 hours longer to do ... :O ID: 1281 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote