Moderator contact thread archive

Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : Moderator contact thread archive

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 . . . 18 · Next

AuthorMessage
rossettaer

Send message
Joined: 23 Nov 05
Posts: 1
Credit: 1,327,637
RAC: 0
Message 17869 - Posted: 7 Jun 2006, 1:20:33 UTC


ID: 17869 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile Dimitris Hatzopoulos

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 06
Posts: 336
Credit: 80,939
RAC: 0
Message 18234 - Posted: 9 Jun 2006, 5:02:13 UTC

Hi,

in thread

PROJECT INFORMATION AND HELP INDEX!!!
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=1769

the last item (17) seems to be about Wikipedia, but it points to BakerLab papers.

You probably need two links, one to the publications and another to wikipedia.

Keep up the good work, Dimitris


Best UFO Resources
Wikipedia R@h
How-To: Join Distributed Computing projects that benefit humanity
ID: 18234 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Administrator

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 06
Posts: 2
Credit: 3,744
RAC: 0
Message 18297 - Posted: 9 Jun 2006, 17:17:52 UTC

At my job theres about 20 old PCs that my boss is planning on scrapping. Their all old, mostly pre-windows 2000 at most. one or 2 may meet the system requirements for rosetta but not all do. My question is, if i take these computers home, and set them all up to run the rosetta project will it matter if the system requirements do not meet? I wouldnt be using the computers for anything else but the rosetta project so thats why im wondering if i can make an exception in this case. Thanks please advise
Regards,
Jose
ID: 18297 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
hugothehermit

Send message
Joined: 26 Sep 05
Posts: 238
Credit: 314,893
RAC: 0
Message 18347 - Posted: 10 Jun 2006, 5:21:54 UTC

Can a Mod stick a link to this all boards so that is has the maximum coverage?
Public Radio Journalist Looking for Participants...
ID: 18347 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Ethan
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 05
Posts: 286
Credit: 9,304,700
RAC: 0
Message 18350 - Posted: 10 Jun 2006, 6:46:56 UTC - in response to Message 18297.  
Last modified: 10 Jun 2006, 6:47:14 UTC

I'd like to point out some of my machines. . I run a department of computers from 'sucky' to 'brand new'. The lower end machines are only ~400mhz, with 128MB of RAM, but they are still able to return sucessful results to the project. I'd say every little bit helps :)

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/show_host_detail.php?hostid=178

-E
ID: 18350 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile rbpeake

Send message
Joined: 25 Sep 05
Posts: 168
Credit: 247,828
RAC: 0
Message 18396 - Posted: 10 Jun 2006, 18:15:05 UTC - in response to Message 18376.  
Last modified: 10 Jun 2006, 18:15:35 UTC

...The only problems I can see are related to the short deadlines for CASP. If the machine is really slow, you might want to run it with the shortest time setting (1 or 2 hours) so it can meet the deadlines.
I think you mean to say to run at a longer time setting, since it will take a slow machine a long time to even do one variant. If the setting is left at 1 or 2 hours, the user should be aware that the runs will probably last longer because the software will not quit until one variant is achieved.

Regards,
Bob P.
ID: 18396 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile Feet1st
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 05
Posts: 1755
Credit: 4,690,520
RAC: 0
Message 18434 - Posted: 11 Jun 2006, 2:26:39 UTC - in response to Message 18396.  

...The only problems I can see are related to the short deadlines for CASP. If the machine is really slow, you might want to run it with the shortest time setting (1 or 2 hours) so it can meet the deadlines.
I think you mean to say to run at a longer time setting, since it will take a slow machine a long time to even do one variant. If the setting is left at 1 or 2 hours, the user should be aware that the runs will probably last longer because the software will not quit until one variant is achieved.


Actually, I think you're both misstating it. A slower machine crunches a WU with a 3hr runtime pref. in the same 3 hours that it takes a fast machine (it just gets less models completed and earns less credits due to the slower CPU).

Regardless of the speed of the machine, if the machine is not crunching 24hrs a day, then you'll want to be sure your WU runtime preference is short to assure the WU ends and reports before the deadline.
Add this signature to your EMail:
Running Microsoft's "System Idle Process" will never help cure cancer, AIDS nor Alzheimer's. But running Rosetta@home just might!
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/
ID: 18434 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile Feet1st
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 05
Posts: 1755
Credit: 4,690,520
RAC: 0
Message 18439 - Posted: 11 Jun 2006, 2:56:32 UTC

Suggestion: Unsticky the 10 reasons people crunch Rosetta thread, and post some of the other reasons posted in the thread into the new webpage linked off the homepage. And people will find the thread from there, and if updates are made, that will keep it high on the list.
Add this signature to your EMail:
Running Microsoft's "System Idle Process" will never help cure cancer, AIDS nor Alzheimer's. But running Rosetta@home just might!
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/
ID: 18439 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
AnEmaul

Send message
Joined: 10 Jun 06
Posts: 1
Credit: 266
RAC: 0
Message 18551 - Posted: 13 Jun 2006, 7:49:27 UTC - in response to Message 9860.  
Last modified: 13 Jun 2006, 7:54:51 UTC

I am new to Rosetta and Boinc, but I have used the old seti@home project in the past. I was concerned with a computation error I had received with work a work unit producing a result 23954214. It isn't the fact that I had an error that concerns me, but rather the result work unit ID 20210159 that had me concerned.

While looking at the results for this WU, I noticed another user (host detail 70228) listed in the results. I then looked at this user's results page (results 70228) and was confused.

I understand that multiple users may be working on the same work unit at the same time, but I don't understand how an error can occur because of it. I don't really care about the results or credit for all it matters, but why perform a task if it isn't going to be of any use.

My concern pertains to the users results page. Is this a watchdog program? Is this theft of results or partial results to jump ahead of a user working on the same work unit?
ID: 18551 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Marty The Flayer

Send message
Joined: 26 Feb 06
Posts: 3
Credit: 3,391,198
RAC: 0
Message 19150 - Posted: 23 Jun 2006, 6:28:42 UTC

I would like to ask why Roseta 5.24 wanted to enter to some IP adress?
Kerio pers. firewall stopped it.
ID: 19150 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Marty The Flayer

Send message
Joined: 26 Feb 06
Posts: 3
Credit: 3,391,198
RAC: 0
Message 19311 - Posted: 26 Jun 2006, 9:49:13 UTC

Problem is, that I didn't write it out....
But it has happened on 2 another computers in different networks.

ID: 19311 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile Snowdog of TSBT
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Nov 05
Posts: 6
Credit: 109,152
RAC: 0
Message 19840 - Posted: 6 Jul 2006, 19:14:53 UTC

Hi there i wonder if you could help me out?

Is there anyway i can get the team founder changed on my team(Scotland's Seti) as the team founder(Giles) isn't around anymore?
The founder member hasn't done any workunits for sometime and i would be quite happy to take on being the founder member as i am currently founder member on other projects, that of course is if its possible.

Best Regards

Snowdog


ID: 19840 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Beach Bum

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 06
Posts: 9
Credit: 196,378
RAC: 0
Message 19863 - Posted: 7 Jul 2006, 4:49:42 UTC

Going to post this now. But will not need the help for a little bit of time yet.
Would like to replace our Team Thread in the Team post. Can I get a moderator to work with on this. Just a simple repost of the newer team blurp.


Come Join us at Hawaiian Beach Bums
ID: 19863 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Marty The Flayer

Send message
Joined: 26 Feb 06
Posts: 3
Credit: 3,391,198
RAC: 0
Message 19871 - Posted: 7 Jul 2006, 7:26:42 UTC

Hi,
I have found that the process rosetta_5.24_windows_intelx86 is trying to enter M$ IP adress 207.46.248.241 => msdl.microsoft.com
Why?
ID: 19871 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile adrianxw
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 05
Posts: 653
Credit: 11,840,739
RAC: 2
Message 19918 - Posted: 8 Jul 2006, 8:36:07 UTC

I have found that the process rosetta_5.24_windows_intelx86 is trying to enter M$ IP adress 207.46.248.241 => msdl.microsoft.com

I know MS have been helping the team with the Windows client. That url is for MS debugging tools? Perhaps it's connected with that? Just a guess.
Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream.
ID: 19918 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile dag
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Dec 05
Posts: 106
Credit: 1,000,020
RAC: 0
Message 20026 - Posted: 11 Jul 2006, 3:48:04 UTC
Last modified: 11 Jul 2006, 3:48:42 UTC

Hello: I would like to draw your attention to a report of three WUs that have been sitting in my results account, long overdue, and errored out since early March. Thank you.
dag
--Finding aliens is cool, but understanding the structure of proteins is useful.
ID: 20026 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Astro
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Oct 05
Posts: 987
Credit: 500,253
RAC: 0
Message 20353 - Posted: 17 Jul 2006, 3:17:27 UTC
Last modified: 17 Jul 2006, 3:18:46 UTC

Mod9 hasn't posted in 16 days, I hope he's alright. He hasn't posted under his "real" account in 33 days
ID: 20353 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile [B^S] Spydermb
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Sep 05
Posts: 2
Credit: 1,407,081
RAC: 0
Message 20394 - Posted: 17 Jul 2006, 18:10:47 UTC

Someone need to look at this thread https://boinc.bakerlab.org/forum_thread.php?id=1944, it looks like there are some participants with runaway credits. This need to be looked into asap, because it causing some unfair credits given out.
Electric Sheep is a free, open source screen saver run by thousands of people all over the world. It can be installed on any ordinary PC or Mac.
Electric Sheep
ID: 20394 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Ilya

Send message
Joined: 3 May 06
Posts: 3
Credit: 342
RAC: 0
Message 20512 - Posted: 18 Jul 2006, 20:36:02 UTC

Hello,

I am using a mac osx 4.6, Boinc manager 5.2.13.

I just reacently noticed that rosetta does not stop computing after being suspended. I have to force quiting the rosetta program (the equivilant of going to task manager in windows). I do not have this problem with bioncsimap. I am not sure why this is? should i download a new version of boinc manager??

thanks
ID: 20512 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile [B^S] thierry@home
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 182
Credit: 281,902
RAC: 0
Message 20515 - Posted: 18 Jul 2006, 20:38:35 UTC
Last modified: 18 Jul 2006, 20:44:09 UTC

Is it not a deadline problem? If the deadline in too short BOINC enters in panic mode and crunch first the WUs with the closer date.

ID: 20515 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 . . . 18 · Next

Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : Moderator contact thread archive



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org