Message boards : Number crunching : Report stuck & aborted WU here please
Previous · 1 . . . 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 . . . 18 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Cureseekers~Kristof Send message Joined: 5 Nov 05 Posts: 80 Credit: 689,603 RAC: 0 |
After 27 seconds: Unrecoverable error for result HOMSdt_homDB027_1dtj__352_1825_1 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)) On this page I saw the job had already an error at another computer https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=10447424 (atm I haven't uploaded mine, I'll do this in a few hours) Member of Dutch Power Cows |
dag Send message Joined: 16 Dec 05 Posts: 106 Credit: 1,000,020 RAC: 0 |
In the last couple of days I've seen several hangs on my system. Too bad they don't automatically abort--I have to abort them manually. The bad part is they've sat there for a day or so taking up a slot, but not doing anything, until I abort them. dag 2006-03-10 13:05:17 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result HOMSog_homDB015_1ogw__352_1003_0 (process exited with code 131 (0x83)) 2006-03-10 13:05:20 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result HOMSn0_homDB004_1n0u__352_1003_0 (process exited with code 131 (0x83)) 2006-03-10 19:31:16 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result HOMSdt_homDB009_1dtj__352_1783_2 (process exited with code 1 (0x1)) 2006-03-12 10:35:27 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result HOMSti_homDB025_1tif__352_1208_1 (process exited with code 1 (0x1)) 2006-03-12 20:55:21 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result HOMSdt_homDB003_1dtj__352_1942_2 (process exited with code 1 (0x1)) 2006-03-13 02:18:27 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result HOMSdt_homDB009_1dtj__352_992_2 (process exited with code 1 (0x1)) 2006-03-13 11:27:59 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result HOMSn0_homDB017_1n0u__352_1447_0 (aborted by user) 2006-03-13 15:33:04 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result FA_RLXce_hom004_1cei__360_79_0 (process got signal 11) 2006-03-13 15:33:08 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result FA_RLXbg_hom001_1bgf__359_105_0 (process got signal 11) 2006-03-13 18:18:25 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result FA_RLXb3_hom012_1b3aA_359_81_0 (aborted by user) dag --Finding aliens is cool, but understanding the structure of proteins is useful. |
David Baker Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 705 Credit: 559,847 RAC: 0 |
I'm having major problems with the WU's that start with FA_RLX. They are either getting stuck at 1% or they run until 90 - 95% and error. are these failing with much higher frequency than other WU on your computer? |
arklms Send message Joined: 17 Dec 05 Posts: 7 Credit: 177,488 RAC: 0 |
SSFEATURES_BARCODE_ABINITIO_5croA_334_286_0 9 hours 1%. This seems to happen a lot on this P3. Can't get it to run via command line either, the window just closes. Looks like I'll have to abort it. |
Team TMR Send message Joined: 2 Nov 05 Posts: 21 Credit: 1,583,679 RAC: 0 |
Had 3 today that have been stuck on 1% after anything between 3-16 hours (runtime set to 2 hours). 3.1 hours: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=11019262 4.3 hours: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=11008654 16.9 hours: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=10949277 All were aborted. |
hob. Send message Joined: 4 Nov 05 Posts: 64 Credit: 250,683 RAC: 0 |
3/4/2006 6:51:19 AM|rosetta@home|Starting result ABINITli_hom010_1lis__322_14_1 using rosetta version 482 this job has been running for over 10 12 days now.........it's been on 84.89% for at least 24 hrs now.......maybe a lot longer ?? its still using cpu power so i assume it's doing something ?? runtime is listed as 256 12 hours so far...and still counting up any advice as to what to do with it would be welcome. 46 years dc so far join team FaDbeens join us |
AMD_is_logical Send message Joined: 20 Dec 05 Posts: 299 Credit: 31,460,681 RAC: 0 |
3/4/2006 6:51:19 AM|rosetta@home|Starting result ABINITli_hom010_1lis__322_14_1 using rosetta version 482 You could try stopping boinc, waiting a minute, then restarting boinc. That could get the WU going again. |
AMD_is_logical Send message Joined: 20 Dec 05 Posts: 299 Credit: 31,460,681 RAC: 0 |
I just had a WU stuck at 23%. It was using CPU but wasn't making any progress. I stopped and restarted boinc and it finished normally. WU: FA_RLXbq_hom006_1bq9A_359_221_0 Result: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13655767 |
Stwato Send message Joined: 11 Jan 06 Posts: 150 Credit: 655,634 RAC: 0 |
I had a work unit stuck on 1% for over 3 hours. It was FA_RLXbg_hom004_1bgf_359_376_0 If another WU gets stuck should I abort it (I aborted this one, sorry if that was wrong)? [Edit: wrote down wrong work unit, oops] |
Steve Shedroff Send message Joined: 7 Nov 05 Posts: 11 Credit: 250,657 RAC: 0 |
I aborted the following WU it appeared stuck at 1% after 44 hours with 59 hours to go. It did not appear to be progressing. 3/15/2006 6:54:16 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result FA_RLXai_hom022_1ail__359_179_0 (aborted via GUI RPC) Regards, Steve |
Ib Rasmussen Send message Joined: 27 Sep 05 Posts: 16 Credit: 211,416 RAC: 0 |
This morning my machine ID 5309, which only runs rosetta, showed an empty Boinc-manager - no, work, no projects. stderrae.txt says ***UNHANDLED EXCEPTION**** Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x0038F114 read attempt to address 0x00000008 1: 03/15/06 22:02:49 1: SymGetLineFromAddr(): GetLastError = 126 stdoutae.txt says (with some editing) 2006-03-15 20:08:46 [rosetta@home] Starting result FA_RLXb3_hom003_1b3aA_359_477_0 using rosetta version 482 ... 2006-03-15 20:36:39 [rosetta@home] Computation for result FA_RLXbk_hom026_1bk2__359_477_0 finished 2006-03-15 20:36:40 [rosetta@home] Starting result FA_RLXac_hom001_1acf__359_478_0 using rosetta version 482 ... 2006-03-15 21:01:42 [---] request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded 2006-03-15 22:02:41 [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi 2006-03-15 22:02:41 [rosetta@home] Reason: To fetch work 2006-03-15 22:02:41 [rosetta@home] Requesting 1470 seconds of new work 2006-03-15 22:02:46 [rosetta@home] Scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi succeeded 2006-03-15 22:02:48 [rosetta@home] Started download of hom027_1ig5A.fasta.gz 2006-03-15 22:02:48 [rosetta@home] Started download of hom027_1ig5A.psipred_ss2.gz 2006-03-15 22:02:50 [rosetta@home] Finished download of hom027_1ig5A.psipred_ss2.gz 2006-03-15 22:02:50 [rosetta@home] Throughput 1687 bytes/sec 2006-03-15 22:02:50 [rosetta@home] Started download of hom027_aa1ig5A03_05.200_v1_3.gz After restarting the manager the two wus picked up at 87% and 71%. The last wu in the queue: FA_RLXig_hom027_1ig5a_360_73_0 /Ib |
Team TMR Send message Joined: 2 Nov 05 Posts: 21 Credit: 1,583,679 RAC: 0 |
Another one: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=11167215 Stuck on 1% after 12 hours. |
UBT - Timbo Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 20 Credit: 2,299,279 RAC: 357 |
This WU was stuck at 1% for a day - then started "on it's own" - got to about 70% done and then BOINC switched over to one of the other projects I'm running (BBC CCE) and immediately I got a "computation error" and the percentage went to 100%. 16/03/2006 23:19:42|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result FA_RLXdh_hom025_1dhn__360_62_0 ( - exit code -164 (0xffffff5c)) So, that more wasted CPU cycles. This project used to be bullet-proof - what's changed....? regards, Tim PS - Our team with 430+ overall members (and at least 130 already joined up to Rosetta) were going to be concentrating on Rosetta for a "Crunching Weekend" on 25th-26th March. see here: http://www.ukboincteam.org.uk/uk-boinc-team.html If this project doesn't get sorted REAL QUICK, we'll be forced to switch our attentions to a different project....! |
m.mitch Send message Joined: 10 Feb 06 Posts: 34 Credit: 1,928,904 RAC: 0 |
I have a work unit that has been stuck at 1% for 10:53:49. I just noticed it. Does anyone want to have a look or should I just restart it? Click here to join the #1 Aussie Alliance on Rosetta |
xrobert Send message Joined: 28 Oct 05 Posts: 3 Credit: 168,865 RAC: 0 |
The WU I have has got stuck on 1%. FA_RLXai_hom023_1aiu__359_454_0 I've now also aborted another unit which begins with ai_hom, to be safe. |
David Baker Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 705 Credit: 559,847 RAC: 0 |
This WU was stuck at 1% for a day - then started "on it's own" - got to about 70% done and then BOINC switched over to one of the other projects I'm running (BBC CCE) and immediately I got a "computation error" and the percentage went to 100%. believe me, we are trying! |
Dimitris Hatzopoulos Send message Joined: 5 Jan 06 Posts: 336 Credit: 80,939 RAC: 0 |
WU 11139882 stuck for a couple of days since 15-Mar ps u -U boinc USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND boinc 27870 0.0 1.3 6800 2944 ? S Jan18 2:07 ./boinc boinc 4280 81.3 0.1 141408 284 ? RN Mar15 2324:55 rosetta_4.81_i68 boinc 4281 0.0 0.1 141408 284 ? SN Mar15 0:00 rosetta_4.81_i686 boinc 4282 0.0 0.1 141408 284 ? SN Mar15 0:00 rosetta_4.81_i686 fgrep pct_ stdout.txt BOINC :: [2006-03-15 16:43:09] :: mode: abrelax :: nstartnm: 1 :: number_of_output: 10 :: num_decoys: 0 :: pct_complete: 0.01 BOINC :: [2006-03-15 16:57:00] :: num_decoys: 1 :: number_of_output: 35 :: pct_complete: 0.0283208 BOINC :: [2006-03-15 17:09:48] :: num_decoys: 2 :: number_of_output: 36 :: pct_complete: 0.0546174 I've killed the task, let's see how it goes... Best UFO Resources Wikipedia R@h How-To: Join Distributed Computing projects that benefit humanity |
Ib Rasmussen Send message Joined: 27 Sep 05 Posts: 16 Credit: 211,416 RAC: 0 |
HB_BARCODE_30_1elwA_351_8105_0 stuck for two hours. Still stuck efter restart. Aborted. Computer ID 177498. /Ib |
UBT - Timbo Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 20 Credit: 2,299,279 RAC: 357 |
This project used to be bullet-proof - what's changed....? GREAT NEWS - Perhaps it might be an idea to let people know there is a problem and to stop making work available until it's fixed - that'll take the pressure off you guys. What sort of percentage of the work returned to you is being trashed by this bug? Would imagine it's fairly high - although, if it was an epidemic failure, would assume you would have stopped sending out work before now. But surely you must be going into damage limitation mode by now. Can you afford to lose lots of crunchers? regards and good luck. Tim |
anders n Send message Joined: 19 Sep 05 Posts: 403 Credit: 537,991 RAC: 0 |
|
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report stuck & aborted WU here please
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org