Memory use

Author	Message
Ib Rasmussen Send message Joined: 27 Sep 05 Posts: 16 Credit: 211,416 RAC: 0	Message 2959 - Posted: 12 Nov 2005, 11:23:00 UTC Is it just me, or is the new client (4.79) using a good 50% more memory than ver 4.78? That's a step in the wrong direction, in my opinion. /Ib ID: 2959 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Honza Send message Joined: 18 Sep 05 Posts: 48 Credit: 173,517 RAC: 0	Message 3007 - Posted: 12 Nov 2005, 18:47:24 UTC Same here - peak memory usage 75MB (about 60% progress). Can't see other differences... I suspect it has something to do with the planned built-in graphics - https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=252 ID: 3007 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

dgnuff Send message Joined: 1 Nov 05 Posts: 350 Credit: 24,773,605 RAC: 0	Message 3360 - Posted: 16 Nov 2005, 2:58:24 UTC - in response to Message 2959. Is it just me, or is the new client (4.79) using a good 50% more memory than ver 4.78? That's a step in the wrong direction, in my opinion. /Ib Yes and no. Virtual size jumped from ~100 Mb to ~150 Mb, but we really don't care about that. That simply equates to about 50 more megs of swap file being allocated. What you care about is the Working set size, and that DID take a bit of a jump, up by about ~10Mb from ~50 to ~60 Mb. Those numbers from both a Linux system and a Windows, the two run about the same memory usage (not too surprisingly). ID: 3360 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1018 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0	Message 3361 - Posted: 16 Nov 2005, 3:12:12 UTC Keep in mind that the memory use is also dependent on the protein and the particular method we are testing. ID: 3361 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote