Message boards : Number crunching : lots of ghost WU
Author | Message |
---|---|
Christian Hagen Send message Joined: 26 Sep 05 Posts: 5 Credit: 46,795 RAC: 0 |
hello everybody. i just had a look at my results. according to that page i have about 100 WU's sent to my computer. but actually there are only about 6 here. i conclude that the other WU's are socalled ghosts (already appeared in other BOINC project, e.g., S@h). So my questions are: - Does somebody else have similar experiences? - Is there a possibility to avoid such ghosts? |
FZB Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 84 Credit: 4,948,999 RAC: 0 |
no ghost units for me so far (in any project, though i think there was a issue with a CC version as far as i remember), what boinc CC version are you using? manager -> help -> about -- Florian www.domplatz1.de |
Christian Hagen Send message Joined: 26 Sep 05 Posts: 5 Credit: 46,795 RAC: 0 |
no ghost units for me so far (in any project, though i think there was a issue with a CC version as far as i remember), what boinc CC version are you using? manager -> help -> about i'm using version 4.43 at the moment. |
FZB Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 84 Credit: 4,948,999 RAC: 0 |
what os are you using? if windows, the recommendend version would be 4.45. on the burp forums i read 4.4X has the ghost problem, if you want to try a beta version (runs stable here and have not read too much trouble on the forums), you might want to try 4.72 win: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/boinc_4.72_windows_intelx86.exe linux: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/boinc_4.72_i686-pc-linux-gnu.sh mac: not sure what the latest "stable" beta is there on the other hand, with a recommended 5.X version coming soon, you might wait for that if you are not comfortable with beta software. -- Florian www.domplatz1.de |
Christian Hagen Send message Joined: 26 Sep 05 Posts: 5 Credit: 46,795 RAC: 0 |
what os are you using? if windows, the recommendend version would be 4.45. on the burp forums i read 4.4X has the ghost problem, if you want to try a beta version (runs stable here and have not read too much trouble on the forums), you might want to try 4.72 Thanks for the help, but i think i'll skip the beta versions and wait for version 5. |
Robert Nelson Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 4 Credit: 1,312,027 RAC: 1,752 |
Version 4.45 solved the ghost problem. 4.43 seemed to have been especially suseptable. Ran 4.45 for quite a while with no problems. Now running both 4.72 and 5.X versions with no sign of that problem either. If you don't wish to use the beta version 4.45 is the standard version and should clear your problem. |
Divide Overflow Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 82 Credit: 921,382 RAC: 0 |
If you don't wish to use the beta version 4.45 is the standard version and should clear your problem. Not if you're using Linux (as Christian is). v4.43 is the current recommended version for Linux users. |
Fuzzy Hollynoodles Send message Joined: 7 Oct 05 Posts: 234 Credit: 15,020 RAC: 0 |
I have the 4.72 version and I'm very satisfied with it! It's very stable and has been since I installed it.' I have heard there was a lot of trouble with the 5.* client, and since my pet project LHC can't run on anything higher than 4.*, I'm sticking to my 4.72 client. [b]"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me[/b] |
Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,812,737 RAC: 0 |
for the moment, me too ... :) |
Rebirther Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 116 Credit: 41,315 RAC: 0 |
After trying download new work with a server error -500 got with the next successful download 7 ghost WUs with Boinc 5.1.8. |
Robert Nelson Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 4 Credit: 1,312,027 RAC: 1,752 |
Thanks David, thats too bad they didn't get around to putting that version for Linux, the ghostbuster fix was extremely helpful.If you don't wish to use the beta version 4.45 is the standard version and should clear your problem. After trying download new work with a server error -500 got with the next successful download 7 ghost WUs with Boinc 5.1.8. Argghhh had not got around to trying 5.1.8, the new versions were coming out way to fast, but if they broke the fix in that one, its time to call Ghost busters. Will wait for 5.1.9 to show up. I have the 4.72 version and I'm very satisfied with it! It's very stable and has been since I installed it.' Agree on 4.72. I am running that on some boxes as well, so that I can continue to crunch LHC and Sztaki. Have yet to see anything on the 5 versions that caused alarm, except the add project wizard, which I don't have to use very often. |
Rebirther Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 116 Credit: 41,315 RAC: 0 |
Here again, got a server error -500 by trying to get new work with Boinc 5.2.2, not one WU arrived but in list marked "sent out" :( |
Robert Nelson Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 4 Credit: 1,312,027 RAC: 1,752 |
Here again, got a server error -500 by trying to get new work with Boinc 5.2.2, not one WU arrived but in list marked "sent out" :( Checked my accounts at Rosetta and other projects running. It appears that I may have received two ghost work units on Oct 14 from Rosetta. Looking at other projects don't seem to find any evidence of any on the other projects. The ghost units were on a Windows computer running BOINC version 5.1.4 at the time, the Rosetta units were version 4.77. Broadband connection to internet. My previous experience with the ghost was that these type of beasties appeared in batches. So either another fix broke it again, or we have another species out there. Now running 5.2.2 on all but one machine, will watch for the poltergeist closely. |
Rebirther Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 116 Credit: 41,315 RAC: 0 |
The problem is still running by me: 29/11/2005 09:15:07|rosetta@home|Sending scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi 29/11/2005 09:15:07|rosetta@home|Reason: To fetch work 29/11/2005 09:15:07|rosetta@home|Requesting 17251 seconds of new work 29/11/2005 09:15:12|rosetta@home|Scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi failed with a return value of 500 29/11/2005 09:15:12|rosetta@home|No schedulers responded After that WUs are listed as sent out but nothing received, the second time Iam getting a "no work from project" message but then getting new work, its only by the rosetta project all other projects are working fine. |
Nothing But Idle Time Send message Joined: 28 Sep 05 Posts: 209 Credit: 139,545 RAC: 0 |
The problem is still running by me: ===================== I've experienced this same error message for quite some time. I mentioned it in another thread long ago and was told by David Kim that he hadn't heard of anyone reporting this particular error. He suggested I upgrade to the latest v5. Well I've upgraded routinely 5.2.2 to 5.2.13 and still have the same problem. Paul D. Buck suggested it might be my cable modem -- but can't prove that. I now have 4 WUs at LHC (that haven't expired and been deleted) and have 17 Wus here at Rosetta that I was supposedly sent but I know I never received. At times like this I wish I had a "Request Resend" button so I could dispose of these WUs. My download error rate seems proportional to the number of times/day that I request new work, yet I never get this particular problem with Einstein@Home (why not?). If this is BOINC software related I wish someone would fix it. |
Golden Turtle Send message Joined: 23 Sep 05 Posts: 34 Credit: 22,941 RAC: 0 |
I had a lot of 'Ghosts' reported in -Questions and Problems- Nov 16 & 17 msge 3440 etc but have received no response from admin, am now running the latest 5... and the problem has probably gone away but those WUs with around Dec 15 deadlines still show in my account as outstanding. |
Nothing But Idle Time Send message Joined: 28 Sep 05 Posts: 209 Credit: 139,545 RAC: 0 |
Not news to others I suppose, but I just discovered that Einstein@Home has software that resyncs the server and client so that "ghosts" or otherwise missing WUs are resent. Refer to thread. I guess Rosetta and LHC don't think that resending missing Wus is necessary; not for me to judge. But I personally am more than a little annoyed at these missing Wus because I feel it reflects on me, my setup, and my ability to produce an output. |
Rebirther Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 116 Credit: 41,315 RAC: 0 |
Iam using now Boinc 5.2.13 and no problems so far with these ghost WUs and error -500 since some days. |
Tern Send message Joined: 25 Oct 05 Posts: 576 Credit: 4,695,450 RAC: 13 |
Einstein@Home has software that resyncs... (snip) It's a question of whether the additional load on the server to deal with the "resync" is available at all, and if it is, if it's worth it compared to the load caused by resending the result to another host. Einstein has "over-powerful" servers with a lot of capacity, while SETI barely scrapes through - there is no way the SETI servers, which can't even handle calculating "pending credit", could handle resyncing. I don't know where Rosetta falls in this spectrum. Regardless, network problems happen. They shouldn't reflect on you; I would only worry about "my ability to produce" if the results I were returning were full of errors. THEN I would try to solve the problem on my end, if any. "Download" issues... eh, it could be anything. |
Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,812,737 RAC: 0 |
There is a "general" problem occurring with some network activities. This was in the Developers thread. All I can say is some of the best networking minds I know of in the BOINC Community are looking at some of these problems. You just may be one of the unlucky few that have these problems. The best news is that they are looking for people that are interested in trying to track down the cause of the problem. The two that I know that are involved are Celtic Wolf and Ian Tighe. So, if you are interested in trying to help locate this problem, will run tests for them, and send them some log information ... well, the world needs YOU! So, are you interested? |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
lots of ghost WU
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org