Check out the Server Status...

Author	Message
Scribe Send message Joined: 2 Nov 05 Posts: 284 Credit: 157,359 RAC: 0	Message 9257 - Posted: 18 Jan 2006, 9:11:04 UTC As per title....some stuff down! ID: 9257 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Andrew Send message Joined: 19 Sep 05 Posts: 162 Credit: 105,512 RAC: 0	Message 9270 - Posted: 18 Jan 2006, 13:41:06 UTC Last modified: 18 Jan 2006, 13:42:37 UTC They probably forgot to turn things back on after the maintenance period. :( On a side note, won't they have to update the pic now that page to include the new file server? :P ID: 9270 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Scribe Send message Joined: 2 Nov 05 Posts: 284 Credit: 157,359 RAC: 0	Message 9285 - Posted: 18 Jan 2006, 17:02:25 UTC Now starting to get more and more No Work from Project on my machines.....one machine now working on its last WU... ID: 9285 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,812,737 RAC: 0	Message 9289 - Posted: 18 Jan 2006, 17:40:20 UTC Assimilator and db-purge are not involved in work issue. WOrk create is off as they indicate 40K or more work units queued (differnet number on index page). ID: 9289 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

AMD_is_logical Send message Joined: 20 Dec 05 Posts: 299 Credit: 31,460,681 RAC: 0	Message 9291 - Posted: 18 Jan 2006, 17:59:11 UTC - in response to Message 9285. Now starting to get more and more No Work from Project on my machines.....one machine now working on its last WU... Same here. I occasionally get work, but usually I get "No work from project", and my machines are running out. ID: 9291 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

AMD_is_logical Send message Joined: 20 Dec 05 Posts: 299 Credit: 31,460,681 RAC: 0	Message 9294 - Posted: 18 Jan 2006, 19:11:20 UTC My machines now have the work they need. This forum is also much perkier than when I posted the previous message. The problem seems to have gone away, at least for now. ID: 9294 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Scribe Send message Joined: 2 Nov 05 Posts: 284 Credit: 157,359 RAC: 0	Message 9295 - Posted: 18 Jan 2006, 19:16:05 UTC Must agree there, everything seems faster and I also am now getting the work. I wonder if someone at WU did something? If so does it need doing on a regular basis? ID: 9295 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

River~~ Send message Joined: 15 Dec 05 Posts: 761 Credit: 285,578 RAC: 0	Message 9296 - Posted: 18 Jan 2006, 19:19:50 UTC - in response to Message 9295. Must agree there, everything seems faster and I also am now getting the work. I wonder if someone at WU did something? If so does it need doing on a regular basis? Sorry to be pedantic but I think it would help if we keep to the following convention: WU = work unit UW = University of Washington here is is quite clear what you meant but in other contexts it might not be... R~~ ID: 9296 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1018 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0	Message 9305 - Posted: 18 Jan 2006, 19:57:39 UTC The status page is working now as it should. We added another server "srv1" to reduce the load on the boinc server. We also have two new beefy database servers that we'll set up soon. The rack is getting bigger and an updated pic may be in order. ID: 9305 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Richard M Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 13 Credit: 320,417 RAC: 87	Message 9309 - Posted: 18 Jan 2006, 21:43:53 UTC - in response to Message 9296. Last modified: 18 Jan 2006, 21:45:22 UTC Must agree there, everything seems faster and I also am now getting the work. I wonder if someone at WU did something? If so does it need doing on a regular basis? Sorry to be pedantic but I think it would help if we keep to the following convention: WU = work unit UW = University of Washington here is is quite clear what you meant but in other contexts it might not be... R~~ Yeah...(some of us git all cornfused when y'all mix up yer WUWU's). :-) Click the Sig! BOINC Wiki ID: 9309 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote