1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report long-running models here
(Message 55850)
Posted 18 Sep 2008 by William Timbrook Post: William, parts of what you describe are normal and expected, and some parts are not. I've moved your posts here to this thread because you appear to have a 3hr runtime (the default) configured for that host, and so the 8hrs you report is well beyond that. Thanks for the update. I had another one like that which was experiencing the same thing. Seeing the 10hrs of cpu time just didn't look that comforting. I wanted to finish the jobs but... some other hosts can pick those 2 up. I was on 5.10.45 (?) but upgraded that host to 6.2.18 but it seem to not make a difference. |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report long-running models here
(Message 55825)
Posted 17 Sep 2008 by William Timbrook Post: [quote]I've noticed a couple of odd work unit packets but I think I now have a specific question. Work Unit 175541763 has clocked over 8 hours of cpu time and 98.001% done. I went to the host machine, stopped and restarted boinc. Now the work unit is showing 55.704% done and about 100 minutes of cpu time. Is this a known opportunity? After 2 restarts of boinc (and upgrading to 6.2.18), the unit got stuck with 9:52 to finish. I aborted it. |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report long-running models here
(Message 55823)
Posted 17 Sep 2008 by William Timbrook Post: I've noticed a couple of odd work unit packets but I think I now have a specific question. Work Unit 175541763 has clocked over 8 hours of cpu time and 98.001% done. I went to the host machine, stopped and restarted boinc. Now the work unit is showing 55.704% done and about 100 minutes of cpu time. Is this a known opportunity? Thanks, William |
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org