Posts by Ulrich Metzner

1) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.51 (Message 37991)
Posted 19 Mar 2007 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
Invalid: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=67574739
2) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.51 (Message 37818)
Posted 14 Mar 2007 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=67218730

This one was unusual short with following output:

DONE :: 1 starting structures built 30 (nstruct) times
This process generated 0 decoys from 0 attempts
3) Message boards : Number crunching : someone explain these wu\'s please (Message 22866)
Posted 18 Aug 2006 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
Maybe this one has to be added to the list:
http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=28344343
There is a discrepancy in claimed and granted credit.
4) Message boards : Number crunching : Just want to say: \"Hello, i\'m back\" (Message 18779)
Posted 16 Jun 2006 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
Thanks for the warm welcome fellows,
now let\'s twist some proteins :D
5) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with download of WUs: Either now work or overcommitted. (Message 18777)
Posted 16 Jun 2006 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
The same illogical behaviour here too using BOINC 5.4.9.
It only switches between overcommitted / EDF mode and fetching no work for days.
6) Message boards : Number crunching : Just want to say: \"Hello, i\'m back\" (Message 18596)
Posted 13 Jun 2006 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
Hi everyone,

i just upgraded from BOINC 4.19 (which wasn\'t able to handle Rosetta) to BOINC 5.4.9 which is again able to handle Rosetta. I only want to express my impression of the Rosetta client, which is very informative and entertaining while crunching. I did quit very long time ago, cause i was pi**ed off by the requirement of a higher BOINC version, which was - at that time - at least unpleasant ;) Things have changed and BOINC 5.4.9 is not as bad as i expected and here i am again! :D
7) Message boards : Number crunching : Unrecoverable error (Message 3907)
Posted 22 Nov 2005 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
Well I quit crunching & detatched Rosetta, I\'m wasting CPU time, all I get is errors. I will check back time to time!
Same here: Nothing but errors... Just changed the resource share for Predictor instead :/
8) Message boards : Number crunching : Loads and loads of computing errors today (Message 1693)
Posted 24 Oct 2005 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
@Ulrich
It\'s too late now, but you should have uninstalled 4.19 (or older) client and then installed the 5.2 client. You wouldn\'t have lost any WU\'s then :(

Thanks, but that\'s exactly, what i did. The installer already told me to first uninstall the old version :/
BTW: Nothing is really lost. I made a backup first ( It\'s not the first time this happens to me ;) ) and after i uninstalled 5.2.2, i copied back the old content. What\'s more annoying is: It already fetched a new CPDN wu, which i now trashed...
9) Message boards : Number crunching : Loads and loads of computing errors today (Message 1686)
Posted 24 Oct 2005 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
10) Message boards : Number crunching : Loads and loads of computing errors today (Message 1684)
Posted 24 Oct 2005 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
Ok, the problem is not limited on AMD Athlons. Just got the same on a 1.8 GHz P4 Willamette CPU:
592071 480093 24 Oct 2005 9:33:00 UTC 24 Oct 2005 10:34:03 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
591998 480021 24 Oct 2005 9:33:00 UTC 24 Oct 2005 10:34:03 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
571322 446833 23 Oct 2005 20:34:07 UTC 24 Oct 2005 7:24:04 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
571307 446742 23 Oct 2005 20:34:07 UTC 24 Oct 2005 7:24:04 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---

If nothing is been done on this, i\'ll detach for a while, cause this is simply a waste of bandwidth :/
11) Message boards : Number crunching : Loads and loads of computing errors today (Message 1680)
Posted 24 Oct 2005 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
Here a little summary for application 4.78:

571322 446833 23 Oct 2005 20:34:07 UTC 24 Oct 2005 7:24:04 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
571307 446742 23 Oct 2005 20:34:07 UTC 24 Oct 2005 7:24:04 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
558197 453166 23 Oct 2005 16:11:33 UTC 23 Oct 2005 20:34:07 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
558170 453140 23 Oct 2005 16:11:33 UTC 23 Oct 2005 20:34:07 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
548794 444768 23 Oct 2005 13:09:45 UTC 23 Oct 2005 16:11:33 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
548776 444750 23 Oct 2005 13:09:45 UTC 23 Oct 2005 16:11:33 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
520387 417610 24 Oct 2005 7:24:04 UTC 21 Nov 2005 7:24:04 UTC In Progress Unknown New --- --- ---
520386 417609 24 Oct 2005 7:24:04 UTC 21 Nov 2005 7:24:04 UTC In Progress Unknown New --- --- ---
490343 393057 23 Oct 2005 1:01:58 UTC 23 Oct 2005 13:09:45 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
490342 393056 23 Oct 2005 1:01:58 UTC 23 Oct 2005 13:09:45 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
480167 382959 22 Oct 2005 19:02:22 UTC 23 Oct 2005 1:01:58 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
470188 373076 22 Oct 2005 13:13:12 UTC 23 Oct 2005 1:01:58 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
470187 373075 22 Oct 2005 13:13:12 UTC 22 Oct 2005 23:46:03 UTC Over Success Done 5,559.07 14.27 14.27
441698 350373 21 Oct 2005 15:32:31 UTC 22 Oct 2005 13:13:12 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---

Except for one single wu all others errored out...
12) Message boards : Number crunching : Loads and loads of computing errors today (Message 1633)
Posted 23 Oct 2005 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
13) Message boards : Number crunching : Loads and loads of computing errors today (Message 1618)
Posted 22 Oct 2005 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
Have not had any errors of the type mentioned, using BOINC 5.2.2 the units lately have been 4.78, windows boxs AMD and Intel processors. I do keep processs in memory. Note has been problem mentioned in many threads concerning not keeping rosetta in memory.

I presume, you are talking about Athlon XP\'s? Because the Athon XP has SSE instructions. The older Athlon Thunderbirds don\'t have SSE instructions. That\'s my point...
14) Message boards : Number crunching : Loads and loads of computing errors today (Message 1613)
Posted 22 Oct 2005 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
15) Message boards : Number crunching : I\'m very pleased :) (Message 1324)
Posted 13 Oct 2005 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
Just for a little reality check, Einstein@Home started out that way too. So did LHC@Home. There are times now when they do not seem to pay much attention.

Ok, here i have to intervene a little bit. Maybe you simply ousted the problems they had? For Einstein i can nearly fully agree to what you\'re writing, since the only bug i know of, was this nasty Windows upper-/lowercase scenario, where files got mixed up, but clearly not for LHC. There we had exactly the same tedious fortran bugs as in Predictor, where you had that nasty dialog box stating some kind of fortran error xyz0815 and you had to click OK to abort that BS-workunit and get BOINC working again. That really p*ssed me off that time, since coming back from work looking at this box only to recognize it opened 5 minutes after you left your flat... :((
Never had anything nearly similiar to that at Rosetta and hope to never have ;)
The only thing people might get mad at is the really high memory consumption in comparision to other projects, but that doesn\'t matter me. Memory is the first thing, even before the cpu, i consider in building a new system...
16) Message boards : Number crunching : I\'m very pleased :) (Message 1313)
Posted 13 Oct 2005 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
Hello to everyone and especially the project developers / admins.

The folks, that recognize me from other projects, know very well, i\'m for sure no cheerleader at all, but for this project i must say: Very well done! Direct from the start this project runs exceptionally well for me. Up- and downloading goes very smooth and credits are awarded almost instantly. Also the developers actually read the posts and questions people are carrying to this forum and respond in a nice way. All in all this project is outstanding at the moment and i hope that this very high standard will continue in the future.

Very kind regards to everyone, who made this possible!
17) Message boards : Number crunching : Crossproject ID (Message 792)
Posted 29 Sep 2005 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
... anyway, the contribution is so insignificant that I would rather just let it die like the project did ... quietly ...

As long as it is greater than zero it definitely is a contribution and is therefore meaningful. I take my (and your) contribution to Pirates as a meaningful contribution to develop Einstein to what it is right now, so you should do also :)
18) Message boards : Number crunching : Crossproject ID (Message 758)
Posted 29 Sep 2005 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
... though I wish I could supress Pirates ... ah, well ...

Hey Paul, why would you like to do that?
Instead you should be proud to be among the 'chosen' that were lucky to get a WU from Pirates! It was great over there as long as it lasted, i had tons of fun!
Arrrgghh! :)
19) Message boards : Number crunching : Crossproject ID (Message 539)
Posted 26 Sep 2005 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
Just to let you know:
The crossproject ID has now corrected itself to the same value as in other projects :)
20) Message boards : Number crunching : Crossproject ID (Message 180)
Posted 19 Sep 2005 by Ulrich Metzner
Post:
Just noticed, the crossproject id is not the same as in other projects. Is this intended? Some time ago CPDN also had another crossproject id compared to the other projects but has now corrected the display.


Next 20



©2017 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org