Posts by STE\/E
|
21)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Heatwave and electricity cost....
(Message 21740)
Posted 3 Aug 2006 by STE\/E Post: I Upgraded all my PC's to v5.4.9 a few Days ago & that seemed to take care of the problem for a few days. This morning I Upgraded just 1 PC to v5.4.11 and went out in the yard for a few hours & when I came back in the Error was on that PC again. But that may have had something to do with Zone Alarm wanting the OK for the new Version Connection. I okayed it & will have to wait & see if it gets it again. |
|
22)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Heatwave and electricity cost....
(Message 21732)
Posted 3 Aug 2006 by STE\/E Post: It's bad enough having to Pay for the Electricity but what I'm so Freaking Tired of is seeing that BOINC Can't Connect to the Internet & Would I like to try again. There isn't a day that goes by that I don't see that Error on half my PC's, and the PC's are just sitting there doing nothing & eating up Electricity when there's WU's on the PC's but BOINC would like to know If I would like to Reconnect before it will Process them. So I have to Shut down BOINC & Restart it again before it will Reconnect & any Projects I'm running that don't have Checkpoints the WU's start back at 0 Time again. So on top of just sitting Idle waiting for me to make a Decision the WU's are lost to, or at least have to be restarted ... It's enough to have me thinking of just chucking it all and saying the hell with it, it's not worth it anymore ... 0_o |
|
23)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.25
(Message 21482)
Posted 31 Jul 2006 by STE\/E Post: Result ID 30771861 Name t347__CASP7_ASSEMBLEABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_new6to205hom022__991_873_1 Workunit 25596465 Created 31 Jul 2006 6:59:08 UTC Sent 31 Jul 2006 10:15:14 UTC Received 31 Jul 2006 16:47:30 UTC Server state Over Outcome Client error Client state Computing Exit status -2147483645 (0x80000003) Computer ID 263791 Report deadline 7 Aug 2006 10:15:14 UTC CPU time 14406.359375 stderr out <core_client_version>5.4.9</core_client_version> <message> One or more arguments are invalid (0x80000003) - exit code -2147483645 (0x80000003) </message> <stderr_txt> # random seed: 3336638 # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600 ********************************************************************** Rosetta score is stuck or going too long. Watchdog is ending the run! CPU time: 14406.4 seconds. Greater than 4X preferred time: 3600 seconds ********************************************************************** GZIP SILENT FILE: .xxt347.out WARNING! attempt to gzip file .xxt347.out failed: file does not exist. Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Breakpoint Encountered (0x80000003) at address 0x77F767CD Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger... ******************** |
|
24)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Miscellaneous Work Unit Errors
(Message 13393)
Posted 10 Apr 2006 by STE\/E Post: I guess you mean the 5.3.28 version? :-) Maybe some more light is needed? ;-) v5.3.28 Blows as far as I'm concerned. The BOINC Manager will use between 2-3% of the CPU even when it isn't open. The only way to get it to stop using the 2-3% is to Close the Manager completly. It will also use 5-50% of the CPU if you open the Manager and the Work or now called Task Window, it acts real jerky at times too when adjusting the Windows ... I never seen any of this with v5.2.15 the previous version I was using ... |
|
25)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Miscellaneous Work Unit Errors
(Message 12359)
Posted 20 Mar 2006 by STE\/E Post: I have a weird one going right now on 1 Computer. I have my Preferences set to run the WU's in 2 Hours & most of the WU's do run in that amount of Time give or take 10-15 Minutes. But this one has been running for 4:22:30 now & only showing 38.71% done, at least it is showing some progress so I guess I'll just have to see what happens with it ... :) |
|
26)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report stuck & aborted WU here please
(Message 12234)
Posted 19 Mar 2006 by STE\/E Post: If you've got a system that consistently has problems with being stuck at 1% then please join Ralph and help them identify the cause. ========== Good Idea, I'll do that as soon as I get some free time ... ;) |
|
27)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report stuck & aborted WU here please
(Message 12229)
Posted 19 Mar 2006 by STE\/E Post: |
|
28)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
no credit
(Message 11317)
Posted 24 Feb 2006 by STE\/E Post: The WU ID shows this (Workunit error - check skipped) which is a fairly common error across the BOINC Projects. As long as it shows that you won't get any Credit unless the Dev's intervene & manually give you Credit for it ... Sorry |
|
29)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
no credit
(Message 11315)
Posted 24 Feb 2006 by STE\/E Post: That work unit shows a Checked Skipped error, thats the reason you got no Credit ... |
|
30)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Controlling new work
(Message 10117)
Posted 28 Jan 2006 by STE\/E Post: I have had Rosetta do the same when set to NNW, this is the only program that dues not obey the NNW command. Ray It does work, I have never gotten new work from the Rosetta Project when I didn't request any ... |
|
31)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Controlling new work
(Message 10105)
Posted 28 Jan 2006 by STE\/E Post: But when I connected this time, MORE 7-day-deadline WUs were downloaded -- __despite__ me having specified "no more work". WHY is the rosetta project not giving me control over what work my system does ? Are you sure your really specifying not to get any more work from Rosetta. When the Tab shows No New Work you will actually get more work & when the Tab shows Allow New Work is when you won't get any more work from Rosetta. It really can be a little confusing until you get used to which way the Tab should be ... IMO |
|
32)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
It was time to leave, it was no particular person - Paul D. Buck
(Message 10066)
Posted 27 Jan 2006 by STE\/E Post: Take Care Paul & I'll see you down the road, take the time also to recuperate from whatever is bothering you before making any final decisions ... |
|
33)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Shorter WU deadlines
(Message 9989)
Posted 27 Jan 2006 by STE\/E Post: Something as radical as changing the deadline from a month to a week can play havoc with work queues, and require some adjustment by us crunchers. ========== I have to agree on that Angus, but then thats what the Abort Tab is for I figure, which I have no regrets on using when a Project pulls something like that ... I don't like my other Projects getting put on the back shelf because 1 Project decides to Override the other Projects by cutting their Deadline down so dramatically without warning ... |
|
34)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Shorter WU deadlines
(Message 9700)
Posted 24 Jan 2006 by STE\/E Post: All the WU's I have Downloaded in the last 24 hours still have the 1 Month Deadline. |
|
35)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report stuck & aborted WU here please
(Message 9348)
Posted 19 Jan 2006 by STE\/E Post:
Thats the Bottom Line, the DCF gets totally out of Range for the longer WU's to complete successfully. I brought this up some time ago, but like the 1% (or other % point) stuck WU's which have been present since & before I joined the Project nothing seems to be done about it. I'm sure the Dev's are trying to correct both problems as it has to be a pain in the Rear End to have them brought up day after day in the Forum ... |
|
36)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report stuck & aborted WU here please
(Message 9267)
Posted 18 Jan 2006 by STE\/E Post: Here's another ABINITIO WU that exceeded the maximum CPU time. Yup, I just had one do the same thing with over 10 hours on it, I was watching it because I didn't think it would make it. The first ABINITIO took under 3 hours to do & it reset the time to completion to under 5 hours. Then the second ABINITIO stumbled it's way to over 10 hours & was only showing 75% Completion, I had a feeling it wouldn't make it ... |
|
37)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Personal Milestones
(Message 9137)
Posted 16 Jan 2006 by STE\/E Post: I creeped over the 25,000 Credit Mark @ the Pirate@home Project last night ... :))))) |
|
38)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Upload errors (error 500???)
(Message 8940)
Posted 13 Jan 2006 by STE\/E Post: Thanks for the info on the error 500. The odd part is that sounds temporary. I have been getting those on this project for a few days. The Rosetta Site has been really slow off & on for the last 2 days or so. I have Broadband & still it's like pulling Teeth sometimes to even connect myself or Navigate around the Forum ... |
|
39)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Help us solve the 1% bug!
(Message 8938)
Posted 13 Jan 2006 by STE\/E Post: One thought DID just occur to me. I hate to perhaps seem biased, but are those seeing the 1% problem running Predictor@Home? Just thinking about it, I have stopped doing PPAH. Paul, I have not run Predictor@home since starting out @ the Rosetta Project. I was getting the 1% Error quit a bit some time ago but like you I haven't had one that I can recall for at least the last 2-3 Weeks. The only Problem's I have right now is sometimes when I suspend a WU it will give me a Computation Error, any more I try not to Suspend or Shut down the BOINC Manager & Exit BOINC until the Rosetta WU has finished to minimize the Computation Error's ... |
|
40)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Feedback, .. bandwidth usage :-(
(Message 8840)
Posted 12 Jan 2006 by STE\/E Post: We can add such a feature/preference in the next application update. It can be a scaling factor or something similar to what is described below that users can set in their project specific preferences. As long as it's adjustable to the WU Length each User is comfortable with then everybody should be happy ... :) |
Previous 20 · Next 20
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org