Posts by [B@H] Ray
|
81)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Failed downloads
(Message 6738)
Posted 18 Dec 2005 by  [B@H] Ray
Post: River~~ wrore: I am still using BOINC client 4.45, does this cause probs for Rosetta downloads? River~~ I am using 4.45 with no problems downloading. One system on mine on my wireless network was having a problem downloading, but cleared up when I moved it to another location, that was a networking problem, not a 4.45 problem. Ray |
|
82)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No work from project
(Message 6238)
Posted 14 Dec 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: I am getting no work from project today again, like others. Have one unit running on 1st system, 1 running and 3 qued on 2nd system. If you run uFluids be sure to turn Windows updates off. MS sent a critical security update to my 1st system overnight, which caused it to reboot when mouse moved (srarting up the monitor). Had 12 hours (58%) completed on one of there units but with no chackpoints lost all. Back to start with the reboot. Cheers Ray |
|
83)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No work from project
(Message 6086)
Posted 13 Dec 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: Main page says "we are back online", but still no downloads here. Cheers Ray |
|
84)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No work from project
(Message 6010)
Posted 12 Dec 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: I am getting the same from Rosetta, but there is plunty of work according to the main page. 1st System is out of Rosetta, but happly crunching away at phase 5 of a Sulpher CPDN model and last SETI unit. 2nd system has 3 Rosetta units left, also putting time into phase 2 of a Slab CPDN model. As CPDN and SETI build up there debt Rosetta will get more time when work can be downloaded. Messages: 12/12/2005 1:14:51 PM|rosetta@home|Requesting 86400 seconds of work, returning 0 results 12/12/2005 1:14:52 PM|rosetta@home|Scheduler request to http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi succeeded 12/12/2005 1:14:52 PM|rosetta@home|No work from project 12/12/2005 1:14:53 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: result op Cheers Ray |
|
85)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Rossetta makes a lot of Phantom computers
(Message 3154)
Posted 14 Nov 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: For some reason Rosetta has been making a lot of Phantom computers for my G5 dual. So now my stats are filled with WUs that I never recieved. On average I am merging my computer with a phantom every day to fix the problem. While this is most likely a BOINC bug it is still irritating. Maby the G5 crunched a protien with a virus!!!!!!! |
|
86)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
This is getting hard!!!
(Message 3153)
Posted 14 Nov 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: Oh you people are making my RAC of 245 look low, but still holding onto 20th place in the best team that there is BOINC Synergy. Why not come and join us at BOINC Synergy, all are welcome to join the best group of crunchers around. Cheers Ray |
|
87)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Find a Drug is heading this way!
(Message 2312)
Posted 5 Nov 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: Welcome to all the FAD crunchers comming over to Rosetta and other BOINC Projects. I think that you will like it here as you did at FAD, there are a lot of great people working on BOINC Projects. Besides the bosrds at the projects there is a lot of help if needed at Boinc Stnergy, they are one of the largest international teams for BOINC. There you can get great signature files like mine below, the latest news for all projects and a lot more. Cheers Ray |
|
88)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Result Page Errors
(Message 2270)
Posted 4 Nov 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: After a result is reported, it would appear that it is shown briefly on your results page and is then 'purged'. For now is appears that they are purging them to soon, hope that they have a chance to get the files first. Ray |
|
89)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Result Page Errors
(Message 2225)
Posted 4 Nov 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: I just found the following that was not happening on the result pages before. For one hoast (24839) it just listed 39 1hx6a units as being issued to me on 25 Oct 2005. These are ones that were not listed there before and I never recieved. Sure wish that I had them. Hope that these don't get marked as not returned by me. For my other hoast (35912) I just turned in a 1pvaA unit 2 Nov 2005 03:22. This is not listed on the result page for the hoast and most of the other 1pvaA units disapeared. I was granted credit, only know because I checked the credit just before and after returning it. As long as credit is granted this is not a real big problem, but can be a pain when checking your units. Cheers Ray |
|
90)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Server download WU ok!!!
(Message 2195)
Posted 3 Nov 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: Got some over night but almost out now, hope that I can get some soon, All I get is no work from server message. Ray |
|
91)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No work from project with 89,369 queued
(Message 2173)
Posted 3 Nov 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: Got plunty of work last night but not today. Still have some on the system that runs mostely Rosetta, but LHC has work now so I set that to 50% until Rosetta is working correct again. LHC and CPDN will keep that system busy. Only 4 waiting to be done for Rosetta there. Still have plunty of Rosetta on the other system that usually runs CPDN most of the time but going down, should last another 4 to 5 days on that system. |
|
92)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No work from project with 89,369 queued
(Message 2073)
Posted 2 Nov 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: I have 2 systems running BOINC 4.45. One ran out and switched to CPDN. (usually runs Rosetta 75% of time, SETI and CPDN get smaller amounts). Was not watching to see if that was intermittent or just stopped getting Rosetta. Other system usually runs CPDN most the time but has 17 Rosetta WU's ( half 1pvaA, the long running ones ), suspended CPDN on this one to run those Rosetta units. This system usually runs CPDN about 65%, most of the rest goes to Rosetta and a small amount to SETI. Sure wish that I could send some of these to the other system. Will be good when the 1st can download again and get these two back to what thet usually do. But for now SETI seems to get the most benifit of the Rosetta not handing out work, the RAC there has dropped a lot with doing a lot more Rosetta and CPDN anyways. Ray |
|
93)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
1hz6A OVER ?
(Message 1747)
Posted 25 Oct 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: No, we are going to send out more. Thank you, looks like I just picked the wrong time to get them for this system. Will not abort these, will run them but will take a little longer, only run it about 2 to 3 hr's a day on this one. Maby I will get some on this system next time I get more work. The other system runs it 75% of the time, large ones there are no problem. Cheers Ray |
|
94)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
welcome new users!
(Message 1742)
Posted 25 Oct 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: It is possable that Housing and Food Services finally got students signing up? Part would have come from other projects users visiting group web sites and finding out about it. And some changeing over from Predictor as they are much lower in credit than other projects. And we can't forget people using the Waki finding out about it as well as word of mouth. Maby just a combination of the above with the smaller WU's brought a lot in. Just hope that they all stay with more protiens being analized and all diferant size WU's. Cheers Ray |
|
95)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
1hz6A OVER ?
(Message 1741)
Posted 25 Oct 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: Are the units for 1hz6A over? Have been running them on wifes computer, run good. I just added Rosetta to my main computer to run a couple a day with CPDN running most of the time. When I got the work I got all 1acf and a few others, no 1hz6A. On this system the samll ones would have been good as I only give projects other than CPDN a little time. On the other system whare Rosetta is the main program the larger 1acf would be great. I like the way this is running diferant proteins but would be good if we could sellect which to run, I would have them all on diferant computers. This one has 512 megs of PC2100 (266 Mh), and fills it up, have a Gig of PC3200 (400mh) on order for this one which should help. The other computer has 768 megs of PC2100, will take the 256 Megs chip out and put the 512 from this system into that so it will have 1 Gig also. Cheers Ray |
|
96)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
problem about the 'Your computers' on website
(Message 1675)
Posted 24 Oct 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: That page always has that link, even if there are no more computers on the account. |
|
97)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Increased to 512MB as recommended memory requirement
(Message 1566)
Posted 21 Oct 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: When I increased the memory on my wifes system the time used was almost cut in half Those times are for it swapping every 2 hours. Tried it running along also before and after, still have about a 2 hour speed up. Bought the memory for other things done on the computer, but Rosetta got a big boust from it so I can't complaine. |
|
98)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Can't Upload, Downloads OK
(Message 1559)
Posted 21 Oct 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: Are you using a wireless network, they will do that at times only one way good. |
|
99)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Try more than 512 Megs of memory.
(Message 1558)
Posted 21 Oct 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: When I increased the memory on my wifes system the time used was almost cut in half. The Pentium 4 that I use has 512 megs of ram and takes almost 2 hours more than her Celeron with 764 Megs, benchmarks for the two are close to the same. Increasing the memory in hers made little diferance on other programs, but Rosetta needed it. Times for the Celeron are at Click here I had also chenged the OS from Win 98 to Win XP so it has a new ID and there are enoughf diferances that they will not merge at the web site so these are just the new times. Cheers Ray Brown |
|
100)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Increased to 512MB as recommended memory requirement
(Message 1557)
Posted 21 Oct 2005 by [B@H] Ray
Post: When I increased the memory on my wifes system the time used was almost cut in half. The Pentium 4 that I use has 512 megs of ram and takes almost 2 hours more than her Celeron with 764 Megs, benchmarks for the two are close to the same. Increasing the memory in hers made little diferance on other programs, but Rosetta needed it. Times for the Celeron are at Click here Cheers Ray Brown |
Previous 20 · Next 20
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org