1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.98
(Message 54176)
Posted 4 Jul 2008 by Hypermarkup Post: Too many times Compute error: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=174297995 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=174188285 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=173801436 |
2)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Personal Milestones
(Message 43313)
Posted 6 Jul 2007 by Hypermarkup Post: Oh my- I've got only 13k (but 35k for WCG). Well, congratulations for all of you monsters! |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Short or long WUs?
(Message 43311)
Posted 6 Jul 2007 by Hypermarkup Post: Hi Rosetters! I've got an important amount of computers located in a computer room, so they are constantly switched on and off... my question: what should we consider better: to work on short WUs (like 1-2 hours/WU) or on long ones (i.e. 6-12-24 hours)?. Let's say that when we switch Boinc or the PC off, the work is saved, so why use short ones -more downloads, more switching-between for the CPU-? Should we try different proteins with shorter docking times for each one instead of receiving one WU and work on it for 24 hours of work time? I know, a WU consists of a group of models, so more work time per WU won't necessary led to a better prediction... or will it? What do you think? |
4)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Meaning of Red "dots" in Accepted Energy Plots
(Message 43310)
Posted 6 Jul 2007 by Hypermarkup Post: Please I'm running Rah for years and I still dunno what the red dots in the graphics (the dots box between the RMSD- and Energy graphics) are. Thku very much!! |
5)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
protein-protein docking at Rosetta@Home
(Message 31427)
Posted 19 Nov 2006 by Hypermarkup Post: Yeah, good work. Go on. |
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org