Posts by LucaB76 - BOINC.Italy

1) Message boards : Number crunching : Claimed/granted credit (Message 39251) Posted 10 Apr 2007 by LucaB76 - BOINC.Italy Post: I would like to obtain some infos about these three WUs: 1i9x__BOINC_INCREASECYCLES10_NOCHAINBREAK_RNA_ABINITIO-1i9x_-_1661_146_0 (#71969554) Result: DONE :: 1 starting structures built 30 (nstruct) times This process generated 21 decoys from 21 attempts Credits: 35.51 1fkaA_BOINC_HALFWATSONCRICK_RNA_ABINITIO-1fkaA-chunk027__1660_47_0 (#71909871) Result: DONE :: 1 starting structures built 30 (nstruct) times This process generated 93 decoys from 93 attempts Credits: 28.74 2a43__BOINC_SMOOTH_INCREASE_CYCLES10_RNA_ABINITIO-2a43_-_1644_5236_0 (#71356910) Result: DONE :: 1 starting structures built 30 (nstruct) times This process generated 378 decoys from 378 attempts Credits: 34.23 Every WUs has been worked out with a Target CPU run time of 8 hours and correctly completed in about 28800 seconds. Every WUs has been crunched by an AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+ that usually scores 65-70 credits for the same 8 hours. I think that about 30 credits for 8 hours of work is quite a low score. Why do this three WUs scored so low? Maybe that type of WUs was too difficult for my PC? The last result generated 378 decoys... Were they worthed ONLY 34 credits? Every reply is well accepted... thanks in advance for your patience! Luca B. from Italy