|
1)
Message boards :
News :
Rosetta@home Update
(Message 112805)
Posted 16 Jun 2025 by tgbauer Post: Please release an AI based BOINC Project because lots of computers have GPUs that support AI running locally. For example, I'm able to run Google Gemma and other AI models locally with Ollama. |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 110118)
Posted 5 Dec 2024 by tgbauer Post: This entry in my DNS server solved the download failure issue |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 109954)
Posted 1 Nov 2024 by tgbauer Post: From a previous threadUnder Linux, signal 11 means that the program tried to execute something that was not marked as executable code. The project administrators should use the dump to determine where the program got the address of what it was trying to execute, and then trace backwards from there.Other than running the latest kernel and/or version of your distribution (or an earlier one if the latest ones have depreciated your older CPU) i can't think of anything else to try. Looks like might be the lack of SSSE issue that was around in 4.08: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=13658&postid=92557#92557 |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 109952)
Posted 1 Nov 2024 by tgbauer Post: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=1587071539 <core_client_version>7.16.6</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process got signal 11</message> <stderr_txt> command: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_beta_6.06_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu @8aahal_r_hal_8aa_3jp5416_d40_1_0001_1.flags -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 28800 -boinc:max_nstruct 20000 -checkpoint_interval 120 -mute all -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -boinc::cpu_run_timeout 36000 -run::rng mt19937 Using database: database_f5ae1de8e1/database </stderr_txt> ]]> One of my systems (phenom ii x6 1065t) fails all Rosetta BETA 6 tasks yet is fine with Rosetta 4 tasks. |
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 109949)
Posted 1 Nov 2024 by tgbauer Post: One of my systems (phenom ii x6 1065t) fails all Rosetta BETA 6 tasks yet is fine with Rosetta 4 tasks. I'm seeing similar with my older 64bit system (Beta 6.06 tasks fail in 1 second without providing output, but all 4.20 tasks complete as expected - "Reset project" didn't help) " 27-Oct-2018 17:57:12 [---] Processor: 2 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ [Family 15 Model 75 Stepping 2] 27-Oct-2018 17:57:12 [---] Processor features: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow re p_good nopl pni cx16 lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy 3dnowprefetch vmmcall 27-Oct-2018 17:57:12 [---] OS: Linux: 4.4.0-138-generic " " Application Rosetta Beta 6.06 Name 8aahal_r_hal_8aa_3jp5416_d40_1_0001_1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_2999122_54 State Computation error Received Fri 01 Nov 2024 12:26:18 AM EDT Report deadline Sun 03 Nov 2024 11:26:18 PM EST Estimated computation size 80,000 GFLOPs CPU time 00:00:00 Elapsed time 00:00:01 Executable rosetta_beta_6.06_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu " For some reason not able to grab stderr.txt in time. Is there something else to look at to find out why the failures? |
|
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 109908)
Posted 24 Oct 2024 by tgbauer Post: Looks like Application "Rosetta Beta 6.06" tasks are using 2.5GB of RAM each! That becomes a bit inefficient when have 128 cores in a computer and 128GB RAM (only 46/128 cores used). Ones before that and "Rosetta 4.20" are consuming less than 0.5GB (and all 128 cores used). The recent beta 6.06 tasks are now using less than 1GB (600MB compressed). Thank you for fixing the RAM size! Now I'm able to use all cores again |
|
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 109905)
Posted 24 Oct 2024 by tgbauer Post:
Fortunately this seems to be a one-off and other tasks are processing as expected. Restarting bionic client caused it to realize it needed to error out this task. Maybe at some point bionic client will recognize similar errors (for any project) and avoid a restart or abort |
|
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 109903)
Posted 24 Oct 2024 by tgbauer Post: Have a work unit that doesn't seem to be getting as far as others, and has an unusually long model (the graphics shows a dot with a line that seems to go on into infinity) Other Tasks are running as expected.
This is stderr.txt command: rosetta_4.20_x86_64-apple-darwin -run:protocol jd2_scripting @flags_rb_09_09_632102_625918__t000__0_C1_robetta -silent_gz -mute all -out:file:silent default.out -in:file:boinc_wu_zip input_rb_09_09_632102_625918__t000__0_C1_robetta.zip -frag_weight_aligned 0.5 -max_registry_shift 4 -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 28800 -boinc:max_nstruct 20000 -checkpoint_interval 120 -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -boinc::cpu_run_timeout 36000 -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 3499362 Using database: database_357d5d93529_n_methyl/minirosetta_database error: zipfile probably corrupt (segmentation violation) error: zipfile probably corrupt (illegal instruction) BOINC:: CPU time: 64841.5s, 36000s + 28800s[2024-10-21 22:25: 9:] :: BOINC Output exists: default.out.gz Size: WARNING! cannot get file size for default.out.gz: could not open file. -1 InternalDecoyCount: 0 (GZ) ----- 0 ----- Stream information inconsistent. Writing W_0000001 error: zipfile probably corrupt (segmentation violation) |
|
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 109891)
Posted 17 Oct 2024 by tgbauer Post: high RAM usage is generally only for the first 30min or so. After that, it drops down to 1GB or less This is not my experience. Have beta 6.06 tasks that are currently near 50% complete and RAM usage is between 2.26GB and 2.50GB each (1.7GB to 2.2GB compressed). Sounds like limiting the Rosetta count is only recourse because RAM to CPU ratio is so far off, can't prioritize the more RAM efficient tasks, and swapping causes tasks to take 10x longer. |
|
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 109875)
Posted 15 Oct 2024 by tgbauer Post: Looks like Application "Rosetta Beta 6.06" tasks are using 2.5GB of RAM each! That becomes a bit inefficient when have 128 cores in a computer and 128GB RAM (only 46/128 cores used). Ones before that and "Rosetta 4.20" are consuming less than 0.5GB (and all 128 cores used). Is it possible to limit the RAM usage per task, so can consume all cores again? |
|
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 105496)
Posted 17 Mar 2022 by tgbauer Post: For example: Thu 17 Mar 2022 12:30:34 AM EDT | Rosetta@home | Computation for task preetham_gen_13074_0001_0001_0_SAVE_ALL_OUT_2912781_849_1 finished |
|
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 105495)
Posted 17 Mar 2022 by tgbauer Post: Getting "Computation error" on all the most recent 1KB size tasks on MacOS and Ubuntu LTS |
©2026 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org