Posts by Calcii

1) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home (Message 89614)
Posted 22 Sep 2018 by Calcii
Post:
If you look at the top ten computers https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/top_hosts.php?sort_by=expavg_credit&offset=0, the first 4 places are occupied by [DPC] Nifhack with AMD:
AuthenticAMD
AMD EPYC 7551P 32-Core Processor [Family 23 Model 1 Stepping 2]
(64 processors)
With: 1) 387,860.43 PPD
2) 264,083.61 PPD
3) 249,572.42 PPD
4) 187,924.58 PPD
How it possible?
GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-4890 v2 @ 2.80GHz [Family 6 Model 62 Stepping 4] (120 processors) only 41,616.11 PPD
or GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v4 @ 2.30GHz [Family 6 Model 79 Stepping 1] (72 processors) 2x 18 cores processors only 41,217.95 PPD
May be super architecture of AMD x10 better than Intel, ok 34 place:
AuthenticAMD AMD EPYC 7401P 24-Core Processor [Family 23 Model 1 Stepping 2] (48 processors) 17,598.95 PPD
And AuthenticAMD AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core Processor [Family 23 Model 1 Stepping 1] (32 processors) with 32 place 17,274.88 PPD.

This statistics hacked of [DPC] Nifhack or what it is, explain who understands?






©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org