Posts by Rockhound57
|
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 77152)
Posted 30 Jul 2014 by Rockhound57 Post: Not for me. No uploads, no downloads, and I have only 2 work units left. |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
These 7 files will not upload.
(Message 72118)
Posted 14 Jan 2012 by Rockhound57 Post: None of my WU's are uploading now. With or without the "hosts" mod. It says that the project servers might be down. Everything is uploading now. |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
These 7 files will not upload.
(Message 72114)
Posted 13 Jan 2012 by Rockhound57 Post: Does anyone know if this has been sorted or ever will be sorted at bakerlab's end? None of my WU's are uploading now. With or without the "hosts" mod. |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
These 7 files will not upload.
(Message 72041)
Posted 9 Jan 2012 by Rockhound57 Post: Quote: "It would have been nice if they had posted advanced warning of the move, since I work in remote areas and leave my systems crunching while at work. I would have set Seti to run while the move was going on before I left for the rig.[/quote]" They did give advance notice on January 2nd. It was on the main page under "news" "Jan 02, 2012 The hardware hosting the Rosetta@Home project is being moved from one datacenter to another on the UW campus. We are using this disruption to update the sagging, aging gear that runs the project. All of this will result in a few days of down time. We will work to keep the outage to a minimum, but you migh want to grab enough work for a 4-5 day period. We appreciate your patience, interest and continued contributions to our research. -KEL" |
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 72004)
Posted 8 Jan 2012 by Rockhound57 Post: I think that you are asking for validate errors with this method because it is quite possible that the server that a work unit is assigned to is the only one that can validate it.[/quote] Not true. I had no validation problems, and received credit for all of the uploaded work units. |
|
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 71999)
Posted 8 Jan 2012 by Rockhound57 Post: [quote]Apparently, yes, there is. put this line in your "hosts" file - somewhere under windows, just "hosts", with no extension: 128.95.160.145 srv6.bakerlab.org just by itself. Then, requests to srv6 will go to srv4. All mine are gone now...... That worked fine for me! Thanks! |
|
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Almost out of work again? Jeesh...
(Message 71823)
Posted 19 Dec 2011 by Rockhound57 Post: I see that we're out of work again. Hopefully they'll add some more jobs today. |
|
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Almost out of work again? Jeesh...
(Message 71780)
Posted 10 Dec 2011 by Rockhound57 Post: As of now there are only 18,000 WU's left. My Boinc manager is already giving the message: "Message From Server: No Work Sent." We will probably run out of WU's in a few hours and shut-down for the rest of the weekend. |
|
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
About ready to REMOVE Rosetta@home
(Message 71594)
Posted 12 Nov 2011 by Rockhound57 Post: "2 years ago, it was 512mb per core, now it's 1gb " My computer is still using an average of 470mb per core. I have never seen it use 1gb per core. |
|
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Out of Work
(Message 69941)
Posted 3 Apr 2011 by Rockhound57 Post: I just got 4 new tasks, so maybe it's fixed now? |
|
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Out of Work
(Message 69934)
Posted 3 Apr 2011 by Rockhound57 Post: Mine is doing the same thing for 14 hours now. It says: "Message from server: No work sent". |
|
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Newbie Q&A, if you're new, have a view!
(Message 69826)
Posted 14 Mar 2011 by Rockhound57 Post: Thanks again Mod.Sense, I have it working perfectly now with 2 batch files, and Microsoft Scheduler. It runs 4 cpu's at 51% during buisness hours, and 8 cpu's at 91% the rest of the time. Regards, Rock |
|
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Newbie Q&A, if you're new, have a view!
(Message 69785)
Posted 10 Mar 2011 by Rockhound57 Post: Thank you Mod-Sense! I will dig into the .xml files and see what I can do! Regards, Rock |
|
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Newbie Q&A, if you're new, have a view!
(Message 69779)
Posted 10 Mar 2011 by Rockhound57 Post: Thank you for the reply. Yes, it is a windows machine, and I have tried various core limitations with the same jerky results. I will check out TThrottle. I didn't realize there were command line options with the Boinc manager. I will check them out too. I just love the challenge of a good batch file LOL! Regards, Rock. |
|
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Newbie Q&A, if you're new, have a view!
(Message 69776)
Posted 10 Mar 2011 by Rockhound57 Post: Hi all; I am a newbie here, and have a few questions concerning the software schedules. First of all, I am using one of our under-utilized servers in an industrial environment. It is an HP Proliant DL-580, 8 Xeon CPU machine running at 3.0ghz, and with 8GB of RAM. During buisness hours, I am running it at 70% CPU time, and evenings and weekends it is running at 99%. It is in a very cold environment, so heating issues aren't a problem with running it that hard, in fact, none of the CPU's ever get over 115 degrees F. I have the time schedules working correctly, but I always have to change the CPU time manually. Is there a way to automate CPU time changes along with the time schedules? Also, when the machine is running at 70%, all of the CPU's run at 100% for a time, then drop to 30% for a few seconds, then back up to 100%. I guess that's how the software averages the CPU time, but it sure looks jerky, and I'm not sure that it is good for the CPU's. Is there a way to throttle the CPU's more evenly so that they are at a constant 70% ? TIA |
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org