Posts by apohawk

1) Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta_2.17_windows_x86_64.exe is 32bit (Message 68411)
Posted 5 Nov 2010 by Profile apohawk
Post:
Alright, thanks.
2) Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta_2.17_windows_x86_64.exe is 32bit (Message 68399)
Posted 4 Nov 2010 by Profile apohawk
Post:
True, and as to why, if no such application were made available, BOINC server would not send any work to 64bit machines.

Other projects send 32bit application to 64bit systems just like that, without confusing names. Some projects with new server-side software can send 32bit application to 64bit systems even if 64bit application is available, just to figure out which is faster and use faster one later on. But it usually makes people complain. SIMAP had to roll-back to earlier server version because of this not so long ago.
Anyway, is Rosetta\'s server software so old that it can\'t even send 32bit application to 64bit system on itself?
3) Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta_2.17_windows_x86_64.exe is 32bit (Message 68376)
Posted 4 Nov 2010 by Profile apohawk
Post:
I\'ve just noticed that the 2.17 i\'m running on 64bit system with 64bit boinc, named minirosetta_2.17_windows_x86_64.exe is actually a 32bit application. Is it a mistake or it is the way it was meant to be? Was it always this way? If it is meant to be this way, why creating \"64bit\" version at all?

Same on linux:
mercury boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta # file minirosetta_2.17_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
minirosetta_2.17_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (GNU/Linux), statically linked, stripped
4) Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta 2.05 (Message 65530)
Posted 12 Mar 2010 by Profile apohawk
Post:
This work unit reports \"success\" despite having errors in the end.

http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=323517090

application: minitosetta 2.05
name of work unit: ina2inaN_to_NOE__18638_5045_0
Outcome: Success
Exit status: 0 (0x0)

CPU time: 2212.594

but at the end of the result we got:
# cpu_run_time_pref: 7200

ERROR: Unrecognized edge type!
ERROR:: Exit from: ..\\..\\src\\core\\kinematics\\util.cc line: 1422
called boinc_finish


CPU: Phenom II 945
OS: WinXP 64 SP2
5) Message boards : Number crunching : Report long-running models here (Message 65493)
Posted 9 Mar 2010 by Profile apohawk
Post:
This one took a long time.
placestub_1zvy_1zma_ppk_ProteinInterfaceDesign_28Feb2010_18489_296_0
http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=322582319

CPU time: 15685.67
preferred time: 2h
application version: 2.05
OS: WinXP 64
BOINC Manager: 6.10.36
CPU: phenom II 945 (3GHz)

DONE :: 2 starting structures 15685.5 cpu seconds
This process generated 2 decoys from 2 attempts

now, what surprised me the most:
claimed credit: 92.63
granted credit: 0.38
Did something go wrong during validation or during crunching ?






©2017 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org