Posts by Terminal*

1) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home (Message 77319)
Posted 10 Aug 2014 by Terminal*
Post:
I have a few 40 core machines i\'m trying to get work on, and they just keep getting refused new work :(

Do you guys take local hardware donations? I could part with several Poweredge 2950\'s.

Most of the links on http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/rah_donations.php are broken links.
2) Message boards : Number crunching : Problem Computing (Message 11438)
Posted 27 Feb 2006 by Terminal*
Post:
also Theres an option to tell it how to run for X amount of time...shouldnt it just run the WU till its over? and not stop at a specific time? whats the difference between 2 hours and 8 hours...is it more beneficial to set it higher or lower for the project?
3) Message boards : Number crunching : too many WUs downloaded (Message 11437)
Posted 27 Feb 2006 by Terminal*
Post:
so isnt it bad for that unit of work if u tell it to finish in 2 hours? wouldnt it be more thurough(SP) if it went for as long as it can...like seti...when it finish\'s..it finish\'s, this..you can actually tell it WHEN to finish? whats the point in that..shouldnt it just run till its finished?
4) Message boards : Number crunching : Problem Computing (Message 11436)
Posted 27 Feb 2006 by Terminal*
Post:
My 3000+ amd athlon xp has very few computing errors..but yet my 4400+ it seems about half are computing errors..but yet when it passes it back out the other person finish\'s it...why is this?
5) Message boards : Number crunching : Optimized Client? (Message 11085)
Posted 21 Feb 2006 by Terminal*
Post:
Welcome to Rosetta

nope, No Op app


ty :) hope to enjoy this as much as seti
6) Message boards : Number crunching : Optimized Client? (Message 11082)
Posted 21 Feb 2006 by Terminal*
Post:
Is there an optimized client for certain CPU\'s like there is for SETI@home?






©2019 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org