Posts by alpha

1) Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta 3.14 (Message 71342) Posted 27 Sep 2011 by alpha Post: Compute error for work unit 408829805: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=450197233 The only problem I see is: upload failure: <file_xfer_error> <file_name>1AI8.ppk1.nobb_docking_benchmark_8Sep2011_30843_72_1_0</file_name> <error_code>-131</error_code> </file_xfer_error>
2) Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta 3.14 (Message 70603) Posted 20 Jun 2011 by alpha Post: Computation error: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=430150155 - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Out Of Memory (C++ Exception) (0xe06d7363) at address 0x750F9617
3) Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta 1.82/1.88 (Message 62561) Posted 28 Jul 2009 by alpha Post: Compute error: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=268080857 The relevant BOINC output was: 27-Jul-2009 08:02:53 [---] Preferences limit disk usage to 0.58GB 27-Jul-2009 08:08:54 [rosetta@home] Aborting task lr8_seq_score12_ss5.0_rlbd_1unr_IGNORE_THE_REST_DECOY_14281_3781_0: exceeded disk limit: 343.49MB > 286.10MB 27-Jul-2009 08:08:55 [rosetta@home] Computation for task lr8_seq_score12_ss5.0_rlbd_1unr_IGNORE_THE_REST_DECOY_14281_3781_0 finished 27-Jul-2009 08:08:55 [rosetta@home] Output file lr8_seq_score12_ss5.0_rlbd_1unr_IGNORE_THE_REST_DECOY_14281_3781_0_0 for task lr8_seq_score12_ss5.0_rlbd_1unr_IGNORE_THE_REST_DECOY_14281_3781_0 absent I'm not sure how the disk limit was exceeded here, 286.10MB != 0.58GB.
4) Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta 1.82/1.88 (Message 62371) Posted 22 Jul 2009 by alpha Post: Compute error after 29,773 seconds: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=267060110 SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
5) Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta 1.82/1.88 (Message 62332) Posted 21 Jul 2009 by alpha Post: Compute error after 4,961 seconds: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=266802566 SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
6) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Minirosetta 1.80 (Message 62246) Posted 16 Jul 2009 by alpha Post: Compute error after 101,115 seconds (1 decoy): http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=265225509 <file_xfer_error> <file_name>sel_core_4.5_low200_beta_low200_start_hb_t374__IGNORE_THE_REST_14057_526_1_0</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code> </file_xfer_error>
7) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Minirosetta 1.80 (Message 62048) Posted 2 Jul 2009 by alpha Post: Two compute errors after 101,000 seconds (28 hrs) with a preference of 24 hours run time. Only one decoy in both cases: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=261928706 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=262283940 Also, two more with 101,000 seconds run time, these ones completed successfully but granted ridiculously low credit, again, only one decoy: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=262122318 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=262236422
8) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Minirosetta v1.54 (Message 60090) Posted 12 Mar 2009 by alpha Post: Visual C++ runtime error with this task after 51,711 seconds: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=234626846
9) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with version 5.96 (Message 53544) Posted 5 Jun 2008 by alpha Post: A strange validate error here: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=168411774 "This process generated 930 decoys from 930 attempts" Yet, it ran the full length of time and got no credit. Any clues as to what happened? I even popped up the graphical interface for this work unit and saw it crunching happily along.
10) Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta v1.24 bug thread (Message 53379) Posted 27 May 2008 by alpha Post: Since the release of v1.24 I've had a couple of work units end prematurely due to "exceeded disk limit: xx.xx MB > xx.xx MB" on this host. I'm a bit confused by this because in most cases the quantities are ~100MB but the computer the jobs are running on allow a large percentage of the 200GB disk to be used, with 65-75GB free. I've since suspended Rosetta because I didn't want to waste any more hours if the problem is my side. Can anybody point me in the right direction?
11) Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta v1.19 bug thread (Message 53061) Posted 14 May 2008 by alpha Post: Access violation (exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) after nearly 22,000 seconds: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=162546878
12) Message boards : Number crunching : minirosetta v1.19 bug thread (Message 52974) Posted 10 May 2008 by alpha Post: This work unit finished earlier than expected, but with no errors: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=161362748 Claimed 130.48, granted 32.86. :(
13) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta 5.95 (Message 52100) Posted 24 Mar 2008 by alpha Post: I woke up to find two more computer errors this morning from one computer: Task 150170224 Task 150294704 Exit status -1073741819 (0xc0000005) on both. Zero credit.
14) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with version 5.96 (Message 52099) Posted 24 Mar 2008 by alpha Post: Waking up this morning I've got two compute errors from one computer: Task 150487485 Task 150487488 Exit status -1073741819 (0xc0000005) on both. Zero credit.
15) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.93 (Message 51956) Posted 15 Mar 2008 by alpha Post: One of my work units errored out. This doesn't tend to happen very often, so I'm guessing it is probably the application at fault. Plenty of stderr info though. I have since updated to BOINC 5.10.45 and am running Rosetta 5.95.
16) Message boards : Number crunching : Failed download (Message 39400) Posted 15 Apr 2007 by alpha Post: Not everyone has a large cache or a fall back project, so perhaps there are concerns of wasted (idle) CPU time. I'm crunching Proteins@Home when my cache is empty. For crunching protien projects when the que is empty of rosetta I find that Tanpaku is better than protiens@home. protiens@home writes to you hard drive all the time rather than only at the checkpoints like Rosetta and Tanpaku. That had been mentioned at the protiens@home message boards last year and the people running it said that they wanted it that way and run it like that on all there systems. The way it ran raised the temp. of my hard drive a few degrees but I don't remember how much. I would rather not put the added work on the HD. That is only my opinion about why Tanpaku over protiens@home. I've contributed to TANPAKU briefly in the past, but I dislike the lack of communication from the project admin(s). Thanks for the heads-up about Proteins@Home though, I've confirmed what you said using Sysinternals FileMonitor. Perhaps I'll look into running BOINC from a RAM disk, then the problem will no longer exist.
17) Message boards : Number crunching : Failed download (Message 39385) Posted 15 Apr 2007 by alpha Post: Not everyone has a large cache or a fall back project, so perhaps there are concerns of wasted (idle) CPU time. I'm crunching Proteins@Home when my cache is empty.
18) Message boards : Number crunching : Workunit error - check skipped? (Message 36083) Posted 4 Feb 2007 by alpha Post: Bump. Can someone advise why I wasn't credited for the above work unit?
19) Message boards : Number crunching : Workunit error - check skipped? (Message 35928) Posted 1 Feb 2007 by alpha Post: I've got a validate error on this result, which is this work unit. It seems to have appeared out of the blue on a very stable machine. The only thing I noticed is that the other two computers that were given this WU generated a "client error" and "unknown" outcome.
20) Message boards : Number crunching : Does it support freebsd? Yes. [solved] (Message 35720) Posted 29 Jan 2007 by alpha Post: Yeah, nothing will work until you've done most of that. I didn't bother reposting it in this thread since I figured anyone interested in making it work would've followed your link anyway.

Next 20