Posts by alvin

1) Message boards : Number crunching : Internet traffic and necessary data (Message 78743) Posted 9 Sep 2015 by alvin Post: I've started with LHC but then it goes out of tasks I got to have something esle and then it all builds up. Also some GPU-based projects' tasks are longer than 5 days alone, so this is a huge mess and mix in that. Finally boinc really plays up with different combinations of projects not getting tasks even if they are available because of whatever (berkeley support wasn't been helpful in that) so my goal is to have crunchers performing instead of idling so lets see.
2) Message boards : Number crunching : Internet traffic and necessary data (Message 78726) Posted 8 Sep 2015 by alvin Post: thanks man so is CPU running time is equivalent of portion of tasks executed? so does it slice tasks to portions therefore then I have more runtime it just crunches one task or portions of it longer? Am I correct? ------ those 7 or 10 days for tasks appeared after my fight to get tasks for projects then they claim "not a priority project" etc lets see
3) Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home (Message 78723) Posted 8 Sep 2015 by alvin Post: I have currently running this project and its all fine except one thing download data amount here is monthly report address download upload total bakerlab.org 24.0 GB (5.4 %) 6.00 GB (6.7 %) 30.0 GB (5.6 %) It's strange as I have opposite issue with other projects - they have huge ratio for download:upload as 1:5 or more. The issue is amount of traffic : could I ask you to pack results on server and client side if possible? Could compressing data be an option in settings? I suppose all those years ages ago noone cares about those amounts, but why the difference disbalance between incoming data and outcoming data is so huge? Anyway I think some action either on project side or whole boinc side could be done to pursue the balance and minimise traffic.
4) Message boards : Number crunching : Internet traffic and necessary data (Message 78722) Posted 8 Sep 2015 by alvin Post: I have currently running this project and its all fine except one thing download data amount here is monthly report address download upload total bakerlab.org 24.0 GB (5.4 %) 6.00 GB (6.7 %) 30.0 GB (5.6 %) It's strange as I have opposite issue with other projects - they have huge ratio for download:upload as 1:5 or more. The issue is amount of traffic : could I ask you to pack results on client side if possible? Could compressing data be an option in settings? I suppose all those years ages ago noone cares about those amounts, but why the difference disbalance between incoming data and outcoming data is so huge? Anyway I think some action either on project side or whole boinc side could be done to pursue the balance and minimise traffic.
5) Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta 3.52 (Message 78496) Posted 26 Jul 2015 by alvin Post: Do you do GPU crunching or plan to? Do you support NVidia and/or ATI?