1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Rosetta 4.0+
(Message 88095)
Posted 17 Jan 2018 by Michael G.R. Post: Version 4.06: Getting "computational error" after 1 second of trying on a Mac Pro, Boinc 7.6.33. Mini 3.78 works fine. |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Am I even contributing?
(Message 73502)
Posted 20 Jul 2012 by Michael G.R. Post: You are! One thing to point out: Rosetta work units will take however much time to complete as you set them to in your account settings. They'll do X number of models and then send the results to the server and then start a new work unit. If you set it to 24 hours per work unit, they'll just do more models and you'll get more credit per work unit. |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
need to many memory!
(Message 73410)
Posted 9 Jul 2012 by Michael G.R. Post: One way to fix the problem is to run Rosetta@home on a certain number of cores, and something less memory intensive on the other cores. I'm doing that on an old computers: 1 core is Rosetta, the other is World Computing Grid doing Proteome at Home. |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Rosetta@Home version 3.30
(Message 73058)
Posted 13 May 2012 by Michael G.R. Post: Got some system-wide slowdowns, high RAM usage, and a couple computation errors with 3.30. |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Rosetta@Home version 3.30
(Message 73015)
Posted 7 May 2012 by Michael G.R. Post: Version 3.30 also fixes the MacOS slowdown issue people were seeing with versions 3.24 and 3.26. Thank you! |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Task with IDs beginning with "Aug20_needle_..." erroring out
(Message 71705)
Posted 2 Dec 2011 by Michael G.R. Post: I think I had the same thing but I'm not sure what the name of the WUs was. |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 71670)
Posted 29 Nov 2011 by Michael G.R. Post: If you go to the "network preferences" tab, you can set it so that you have an extra buffer of a couple of days. This should mean that you have enough WUs to get through almost any outage without missing a beat. |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
About ready to REMOVE Rosetta@home
(Message 71643)
Posted 26 Nov 2011 by Michael G.R. Post: Thanks for the useful posts, Modsense. |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Intel unveils 1 teraflop chip with 50-plus cores
(Message 71621)
Posted 18 Nov 2011 by Michael G.R. Post: Just think about how much RAM this would use if you ran one Rosetta@Home instance on each core =) |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
(Message 70838)
Posted 1 Aug 2011 by Michael G.R. Post: Calm down everybody. We're trying to cure diseases and make science progress. A little patience. The project is doing excellent science, and while communication could be better sometimes, they're allowed to miss a few days here and there. We might not see it on our end, but I'm sure things are pretty hectic on the other side of the screen... |
11)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
DISCUSSION of Rosetta@home Journal (5)
(Message 70629)
Posted 23 Jun 2011 by Michael G.R. Post: I just want to say that I'm EXTREMELY happy that R@H is working on amyloid fibril formations. Hopefully someday we have a vaccine! |
12)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
RNA RESEARCH
(Message 68925)
Posted 29 Dec 2010 by Michael G.R. Post: Thanks for posting, Rochester. |
13)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
DISCUSSION of Rosetta@home Journal (5)
(Message 68723)
Posted 28 Nov 2010 by Michael G.R. Post: Congrats! Glad to see Rosetta@home being used for so many great projects on top of the research of developping RAH in the first place. |
14)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
DISCUSSION of Rosetta@home Journal (4)
(Message 68160)
Posted 21 Oct 2010 by Michael G.R. Post: Hi Dr. Baker, Any updates on the science of the project, or the code of RAH, or CASP? It's been over 3 months since you're last update and I'm curious to know what has been going on. thanks, Mike |
15)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Rosetta vs HPF at WCG
(Message 68006)
Posted 9 Oct 2010 by Michael G.R. Post: Yes, Rosetta@home is doing both research AND developing the software to do the research. Someone else can surely give more details about exactly what those research projects have been lately... |
16)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Fold It article at Ars Technica
(Message 67146)
Posted 9 Aug 2010 by Michael G.R. Post: Originally the Ars article didn't have a link to Rosetta@home, but I contacted the author and he agreed to add a link. |
17)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Fold It article at Ars Technica
(Message 67101)
Posted 4 Aug 2010 by Michael G.R. Post: http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/08/gamers-beat-algorithms-for-finding-protein-structures.ars Very popular site, should bring good traffic to Fold It and hopefully Rosetta@home too. |
18)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
DISCUSSION of Rosetta@home Journal (4)
(Message 66654)
Posted 23 Jun 2010 by Michael G.R. Post: Thanks for the update Dr. Baker, and congrats to everybody involved with R@H (both in the lab and the volunteers)! |
19)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
DISCUSSION of Rosetta@home Journal (4)
(Message 66257)
Posted 21 May 2010 by Michael G.R. Post: Sadly, it looks like most of the recent gains have been lost. Too bad it didn't at least last for the duration of CASP 9. |
20)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Rosetta@home featured on Discovery website
(Message 66199)
Posted 18 May 2010 by Michael G.R. Post: http://planetgreen.discovery.com/tech-transport/3-ways-your-computer-can-cure-diseases.html The article also recommends Folding@home and WCG, but ranks Rosetta higher :) |
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org