Posts by Jocelyn Larouche

1) Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : reversed engineering (Message 6939)
Posted 20 Dec 2005 by Jocelyn Larouche
Post:
Has reversed engineering been done on known protein to find where the lowest movement would produce the greater change in energy?
We could find the strongest ligand and allow them less movement and allow more movement to weaker ligands.
2) Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : Graphics (Message 5210)
Posted 5 Dec 2005 by Jocelyn Larouche
Post:
we will soon be starting a new round of runs in which each trajectory is directed towards low energy regions of the landscape identified in the runs you are doing now


You mean the good stuff is coming soon. hehe :-)
3) Message boards : Number crunching : Screensaver crashing computer (Message 5209)
Posted 5 Dec 2005 by Jocelyn Larouche
Post:
I updated my graphics driver 2 days ago. So far so good!
4) Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : Suggestions and Questions (Message 4978)
Posted 2 Dec 2005 by Jocelyn Larouche
Post:
This would be a great approach to solving the problem, as it would reduce the combinatorial complexity enormously. It turns out, however, that even though proteins are synthesized one amino acid at a time, folding probably does not occur until most of the protein is made because special helper proteins, called "chaperones" prevent folding from occuring prematurely. The problem is that most pieces of proteins do not fold into stable structures (this is part of why the prediction problem is difficult!), and so the growing peptide chain would likely make incorrect and possibly dangerous interactions with other molecules unless kept in check by the chaperones. So unfortunately, a chain growing algorithm would probably not work well here--the global minimum is only clearly defined in the context of the whole protein chain.


Hi David,

Can it be possible to have a low energy and low rmsd that would be different from the original one? or would they be unstable at some point?
5) Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : Suggestions and Questions (Message 4725)
Posted 29 Nov 2005 by Jocelyn Larouche
Post:
Is it true that proteins are built in the same order every time?


Genes have markers to initiate the build sequence a start and a finish so it cannot be built backward.

And yes dgnuff you definitly got my point
6) Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : Suggestions and Questions (Message 4690)
Posted 29 Nov 2005 by Jocelyn Larouche
Post:
What I remember from my biology classes is that protein are made of rna pair wich are split by enzymes and starts to fold. It will split the first pair and the rest works like a chain reaction. The angles between the amino acids are standard until the protein fold back on itself wich cause irregular bend. So why not start from there?
7) Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : Graphics (Message 3934)
Posted 22 Nov 2005 by Jocelyn Larouche
Post:
I got one WU with graphics today and was able to see the last 2 minutes of it coming back from lunch. Awsome! I'm sure with all the inputs from rosetteers that Jack will be able to impress us even more.
8) Message boards : Number crunching : Dual Core X2's (Message 3535)
Posted 17 Nov 2005 by Jocelyn Larouche
Post:
You have to set the Boinc-Preferences to use 1 or 2 processor
set it to 1 if you plan to use extensively your box
and 2 if you don't mind waiting for other applications to start.
I don't think affinity assignment would increase the speed.
unless you assign the same affinity to all other program. this would slow only 1 cpu. I for myself think this is useless.

Joss
9) Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : Graphics (Message 3514)
Posted 17 Nov 2005 by Jocelyn Larouche
Post:
I got one WU with graphics at 3am while I was sleeping so there's not much I can say, can I?

What king of beta testing is this? How can it test if it interfere with other program or graphic in use or is compatible with my card. I think the beta test will be on when and only when all WU have graphics.

Joss

10) Message boards : Cafe Rosetta : Rosetteer (Message 3303)
Posted 15 Nov 2005 by Jocelyn Larouche
Post:
That's what I call myself. feel free to use it!
11) Message boards : Number crunching : code release and redundancy (Message 2827)
Posted 10 Nov 2005 by Jocelyn Larouche
Post:
As far as coding goes you probably should get help from experts you have very close contact with, to prevent unofficial program being run. As far as algorythm goes, this should be open to general public for discussion.






©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org