Posts by JChojnacki
|
21)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Minirosetta v1.28 bug thread
(Message 53641)
Posted 12 Jun 2008 by  JChojnacki
Post: These two WU's failed. http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=170484604 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=170480720 |
|
22)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
DISCUSSION of Rosetta@home Journal (3)
(Message 53024)
Posted 12 May 2008 by JChojnacki
Post: David, Thanks for your post regarding CASP8 on May 12. Great information. I would like to recommend though, that this particular post be copied to the front page news section as well. If added to the news section, it should then also be disseminated to all the various stats sites, as you may already know. Thereby, hopefully, encouraging others to join in the CASP fun. :-) Anyway, just a thought. Joel |
|
23)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TFlops
(Message 52624)
Posted 20 Apr 2008 by JChojnacki
Post: One thing I think is kind of cool. Since this thread was started, a little more than a year ago, we have gone from 40 Tflops sustained to our current 70 Tflops sustained. Way to go fellow crunchers. Let’s keep it up! :-) ~Joel |
|
24)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Personal Milestones
(Message 52325)
Posted 7 Apr 2008 by JChojnacki
Post: Wow, it has been a long haul, but I hit the 500,000 mark on Rosetta today.  ~Joel |
|
25)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Rank #4 Best Computers!
(Message 52160)
Posted 28 Mar 2008 by JChojnacki
Post: http://michaelgr.com/2008/03/27/big-cruncher/ Congrats on the ranking. Great job on the blog!! ~Joel |
|
26)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Happy new year
(Message 50233)
Posted 1 Jan 2008 by JChojnacki
Post: A hearty Happy New Year from the Baker group IT here in Seattle to all of you who've made Rosetta@home such a success! Happy New Year to everyone at the Baker group and to everyone in crunching land. May 2008 bring you much success. Joel |
|
27)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.80
(Message 47433)
Posted 6 Oct 2007 by JChojnacki
Post: Looks like I had another 5.80 error, with this work unit: FLUA__BOINC_LONGNOE_JUMPRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE-FLUA_-_2120_46884_1 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=110504357 Joel |
|
28)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.80
(Message 47408)
Posted 4 Oct 2007 by JChojnacki
Post: Hey, Got an error today with this work unit: HR19__BOINC_LONGNOE_JUMPRELAX_BARCODE_SAVE_ALL_OUT_200-HR19_-_2121_43593_0 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=109858641 Thanks, ~Joel |
|
29)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
New paper in PNAS on protein folding
(Message 46561)
Posted 19 Sep 2007 by JChojnacki
Post: Thanks for the link. It was a good read. Made me a little curious too. Does anyone know if that group participates in CASP? If so, how did they fair against Rosetta? Again, just curious. Have a good one, ya'll. ;-) Joel from TN |
|
30)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Using University Computers
(Message 45964)
Posted 10 Sep 2007 by JChojnacki
Post: Finally, while R@H is part of the UW, Rosetta is used by research groups around the world (for free if academic). Part of what R@H does is improve the Rosetta code, so helping this project could very well impact scientists at your university. That is a great point! I bet it may be worth checking, with various people and Professors, to see if anyone is currently using Rosetta at your University, for any type of research. If so, maybe that Professor could become an ally in your campaign to bring Rosetta@home to your University. |
|
31)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
T-FLOPS jump??
(Message 45962)
Posted 10 Sep 2007 by JChojnacki
Post: Still, it's kind of cool to see this number, as of 6:08 PM EDT. TeraFLOPS estimate: 99.998 Hopefully we will be able to get it to stay at that level someday soon. ~Joel |
|
32)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Daily quota
(Message 45642)
Posted 1 Sep 2007 by JChojnacki
Post: what do you run on that monster (apart from rosetta!)? Sorry for the language, but: FRICK'N AWESOME!!! ~Joel P.S. I would be really curious though, to see how many models that monster could crunch out per individual WU's, if set to 24hr WU run time. |
|
33)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
We could have found a better use.....I think.
(Message 45328)
Posted 23 Aug 2007 by JChojnacki
Post: You know I think we could have found a better use than this guy did, for these poor CPU's. While making a desk out of a few hundred Itanium CPUs may look nice, I cringe at the thought of the lost crunching power. Oh well, what's done is done. |
|
34)
Message boards :
Cafe Rosetta :
Last one to post here wins! #2
(Message 43778)
Posted 16 Jul 2007 by JChojnacki
Post: nah, penguins are faster than cars..... Rad!!! |
|
35)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Lots of decoys!
(Message 41328)
Posted 23 May 2007 by JChojnacki
Post: Wow, now this is a lot of decoys: From one of my WU's ====================================================== DONE :: 1 starting structures 86400.4 cpu seconds This process generated 1629 decoys from 1629 attempts Though, I do run my for 24 hours each. ;-) Cool. |
|
36)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
How can we bring more users to the Rosetta project?
(Message 41045)
Posted 15 May 2007 by JChojnacki
Post: Once things settle down I'll update the technical details of everything so that those of you who might be interested can see how we do it here in the Baker Lab - for BOINC and more generally at our datacenters in the Seattle area. Keith, I understand you are busy. So, please don't over tax yourself to get us this information. However, I must say, it sounds interesting. I sit anxiously waiting for your post. ;-) Thanks, Joel |
|
37)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
How can we bring more users to the Rosetta project?
(Message 40752)
Posted 12 May 2007 by JChojnacki
Post: I simply hate to see that a 3Ghz p4 is taking the same time as my Core duo 2 3.6 ghz to crunch a unit ! Alex, I respect your views. However, I am not sure you are aware, but all Rosetta units crunch for a user set amount of time. You can set a WU to run from 1 hour to 24 hours. The type of CPU does not matter, the WU will crunch for however long you set it. What the difference is, is the number of models (or decoys) that the CPU's produce. You will find that a Core 2 Duo would produce many more models than a 3.4Ghz P4. If you knew that already, that's cool, but I just wanted to make sure you were aware of the difference. Thanks, Joel P.S. Thanks for your spare CPU cycles while Seti is down. |
|
38)
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Meaning of Red "dots" in Accepted Energy Plots
(Message 40750)
Posted 12 May 2007 by JChojnacki
Post: What do the red dots represent in the accepted energy plot area of the charts? I have noticed sometimes that there are numerous red dots. If you are looking at the red dots in graphic mode, then yes, they are only for your local unit. However, on the Rosetta home page under the "Returning participants" section, the second link "Results - view your results" will take you to a page that list some of the work units you have completed. If you click on any of those WU's you will be taken to a page that shows your results as compared to the rest of the world. Hope that helps a little. Joel |
|
39)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Coming from SETI and have couple Rosetta questions...
(Message 40680)
Posted 10 May 2007 by JChojnacki
Post: Welcome Free! |
|
40)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
TFlops
(Message 40393)
Posted 6 May 2007 by JChojnacki
Post: Talk about sweet, almost at 60 TFlops as of 6 May 2007 2:50:05 UTC. TeraFLOPS estimate: 59.125 That is so cool. Joel |
Previous 20 · Next 20
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org