1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
140+ times more granted then claimed
(Message 47915)
Posted 22 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: Please see http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=101622736 Claimed 30.53 Granted 4,293.17 Computer 567404 has multiple of these. I know there can be some diff but 140+ times seems a bit much. Marcel |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta stable version 5.69 and beta version 5.77
(Message 45399)
Posted 25 Aug 2007 by ![]() Post: On my Mac's Core 2 Duo and G5 I get 5.77 jobs that hang after 2 seconds. The only thing I can do is abort them. with kind regards, Marcel |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.68 and 5.70
(Message 44297)
Posted 26 Jul 2007 by ![]() Post: Hello, I also have many problems on 32 and 64 bit linux. I run Debian 4.0 amd64 on a Core 2 Duo ( host id = 304690 ). In the last 30 days I lost over 2 days in computing time! Till yesterday I run 32bit boinc using extra libs. Yesterday I did install 64 bit boinc and did a reset of all the projects. As far as I can see the number of compute errors has not dropped. I now also run my own scripting to automatically kill and restart boinc. ( if load / core < 90% or > 110% ) And it kills all "rosetta" and "setiathome" processes with init as parent. Even with these kind of tricks my machine cannot compete with a Window$ installation. I have the feeling that on macOSX the softawre is getting more stable. Marcel |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Failed download
(Message 38662)
Posted 29 Mar 2007 by ![]() Post: Same here, 3 computers doing nothing. Why is there no email address for this kind of stuff? |
5)
Questions and Answers :
Web site :
Server error!
(Message 29294)
Posted 13 Oct 2006 by ![]() Post: I get the message: Message from server: Project encountered internal error: shared memory Project is down I do believe that this is not what we want. Marcel |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Score difference on same machine
(Message 29088)
Posted 9 Oct 2006 by ![]() Post: Zombie67. We run Debian "etch" on Core 2 Duo ( me 3.16Ghz koru77 on 3.40Ghz ). Basically we are running VMware Server on this machine. No GUI is installed. We both have 4Gb RAM for this we need the EM64T part. We run BIONC under the ai32 libs. With kind regards, Marcel |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Score difference on same machine
(Message 29078)
Posted 9 Oct 2006 by ![]() Post: I have some doubts about this. I myself use 3 machines that run 24/7. Computer ID=282024 Dual G5 PPC 2Ghz ( MacOSX ) Computer ID=304690 Core 2 Duo 6400 @ 2.13Ghz ( Linux x86_64 ) Computer ID=293595 Dual P3 500Mhz ( Linux i686 ) my RAC = +- 850 Now how could 303222 get a RAC of 750 at best? see "http://stats.kwsn.net/user.php?proj=all&cpid=528d63d2398046e16f87f7a938450e26&period=4weeks" Please don't tell me that the CPU speed ( 2.13Ghz -> 2.40Ghz ) has the same affect as an Dual G5 2Ghz. Marcel |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Score difference on same machine
(Message 29070)
Posted 9 Oct 2006 by ![]() Post: Hello, I have a question about the scores on the same machine after switching OS. computer id=303222 mfps=2254.4 mis=4709.07 computer id=323181 mfps=1486.38 mis=2711.54 This is the same computer. 303222 = Windows i386 ( limited to 3.2 Gb RAM ) 323181 = Linux x86_64 ( not limited ) The Linux machine uses less resources when running and still gets just above have the points. Why? I do **not** think that the ia32 libs on Linux will slow down everything that much. And yes we did install a SMP kernel. With kind regards, Marcel |
©2023 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org