1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Discussion of the new credit systen (2)
(Message 29473)
Posted 16 Oct 2006 by Bad_Wolf Post:
Hosts' data have the number of CPUs installed, and having a big (because it's BIG) number of hosts in the database probably the average wouldn't be so far from reality
Maybe i didn't explain myself, sorry, english is my second language. I meant to ADD a benchmark (maybe a simple loop increasing a variable for 10 secs or less) before starting to crunch the data. BadWolf |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Discussion of the new credit systen (2)
(Message 29435)
Posted 16 Oct 2006 by Bad_Wolf Post: Just my 2 cents opinion: If real speed is the problem, why don't add a little 10 secs benchmark before the initialization? In this way , with the WU's result and times, will come the real base to calculate the math done and the points to give. [edit] Another way could be an average speed for every single class of CPU. For each host you have the CPU used and the BOINC benchmark result... it shouldn't be difficoult to calculate such average... [/edit] |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU Upgrade Suggestions Anyone?
(Message 29434)
Posted 16 Oct 2006 by Bad_Wolf Post: I'd wait for a CPU upgrade... Intel will come out with the new Core 2 Quad (4 cores... wow!) in november, so probably the Core 2 Duo will be cheaper |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report problems with Rosetta version 5.32
(Message 29433)
Posted 16 Oct 2006 by Bad_Wolf Post: Not an error but strange thing: new 5.32 works fine on my P4 1.8Ghz, 1Gb RAM (XP pro sp2), but after the first hour working it suspended at 19.9%... when it restarted it jumped immediatly at 41.2%. Is it normal? |
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org