1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.40
(Message 31509)
Posted 21 Nov 2006 by ![]() Post: Ever since about October 20 somthing my computer was crashing more than normal. Windows XP SP2. I am not in control of the maintnenace of this box so I always wait a few weeks to see it the auto-updates I get fix things. I noticed that Rosetta was up-versioned about the same time as my crashing problem so I stoped receiving work units for a short time. The problem went away. I noticed a new version of Rosetta today so I started back up. I'll let you know if I have further problems. Could have all been a coincinence. The crash alwasys strted with slow mouse/keyboard resonce, then total mouse and keyboard lockout. Power down was only way to reboot. Just thought you should know. Steve |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.16 I
(Message 17033)
Posted 25 May 2006 by ![]() Post: This may be coincidence, but I just downloaded the most recent BOINC Client and all my numbers are dropping. Work per day is about 1/2 of what it was before the new client. This is true on MacX and Intel P4 systems. Is it just me? Sorry, Client is 5.4.9 all both systems. One thing I noticed and changed after I noticed the slow down and it appears to help the Intel boxes. I turned off the screen saver. At least 2 Intel boxes were hanging on the screensaver (no Rosetta progress while screensaver was active). On both these boxes, BOINC & Rosetta has consistently run better without the screensaver mode. The new install defaulted to turning on the screensaver. numbers have been improving since this change. |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report Problems with Rosetta Version 5.16 I
(Message 16946)
Posted 24 May 2006 by ![]() Post: This may be coincidence, but I just downloaded the most recent BOINC Client and all my numbers are dropping. Work per day is about 1/2 of what it was before the new client. This is true on MacX and Intel P4 systems. Is it just me? |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report stuck & aborted WU here please
(Message 12079)
Posted 16 Mar 2006 by ![]() Post: I aborted the following WU it appeared stuck at 1% after 44 hours with 59 hours to go. It did not appear to be progressing. 3/15/2006 6:54:16 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result FA_RLXai_hom022_1ail__359_179_0 (aborted via GUI RPC) Regards, Steve |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Improvements to Rosetta@home based on user feedback
(Message 11558)
Posted 2 Mar 2006 by ![]() Post: Since the change to WU matched to processing time to minimize transfer losses, I have seen my daily averages and my overall average WU/day soar. I also noticed the total project Teraflops go up. Good move. I noticed that the number of pending WU is much lower on each machine. I assume this is also good for the project, since there is less work at risk of a lost/delayed machine, you will be able to lower the level of redundant WU's sent out to insure total coverage. Net higher throughput and higher reliability. |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report stuck & aborted WU here please
(Message 11427)
Posted 26 Feb 2006 by ![]() Post: This work unit was at 1% after 86 hours with 96 hours to go so I aborted it. 2/26/2006 1:15:09 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result PRODUCTION_ABINITIO_INCREASECYCLES50_2acy__317_316_0 (aborted via GUI RPC) Regards, Steve |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report stuck & aborted WU here please
(Message 10775)
Posted 15 Feb 2006 by ![]() Post: I have had a large number of downloads freeze and keep data from flowing so work has stopped. Most have the "fasta" designationin thier name. I just aborted about 20 downloads. Each took two aborts or more to actually kill them. I was getting Error 500 and error 505 messages from BOINC. Any idea what I may have set wrong that might be causing this? I saved a portion of the message log if anyone wnats to see the communication thread. Work is on a laptop that moves from connection to connection, some with Proxy and some without. I manually change proxy setting to fit location. Been running BOINC for some time now, 10,451 WU on this computer so far. This started happening this week. |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE ERRORS !!
(Message 10501)
Posted 6 Feb 2006 by ![]() Post: NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_2reb_286_4473_1 has run for over 20:13 hours and is but 1% complete. Looks like I should abort this one. |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Upload trouble
(Message 9279)
Posted 18 Jan 2006 by ![]() Post: Nothing there about failed upload...its says failed DOWNLOAD! Duh! Brain fart here. Downloads are safer to abort. Aborted it and all cleared up. Work is flowing again. Thanks. Steve |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Upload trouble
(Message 9276)
Posted 18 Jan 2006 by ![]() Post: I have had a couple WU that fail to upload. Here is the latest. Last time I let this go a couple days then aborted the upload. Is there a better way to deal with this? Here is the message log from this mornings startup. The first failure was my fault I forgot to set my proxy on after docking my laptop at work. 1/18/2006 9:10:10 AM||Starting BOINC client version 5.2.13 for windows_intelx86 1/18/2006 9:10:10 AM||libcurl/7.14.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8 zlib/1.2.3 1/18/2006 9:10:10 AM||Data directory: C:Program FilesBOINC 1/18/2006 9:10:10 AM||Processor: 1 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.60GHz 1/18/2006 9:10:10 AM||Memory: 503.36 MB physical, 1.20 GB virtual 1/18/2006 9:10:10 AM||Disk: 37.25 GB total, 14.14 GB free 1/18/2006 9:10:10 AM|rosetta@home|Computer ID: 57396; location: work; project prefs: default 1/18/2006 9:10:10 AM||General prefs: from rosetta@home (last modified 2005-12-17 21:56:17) 1/18/2006 9:10:10 AM||General prefs: using separate prefs for work 1/18/2006 9:10:11 AM||Remote control not allowed; using loopback address 1/18/2006 9:31:05 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: project op 1/18/2006 9:31:09 AM|rosetta@home|Sending scheduler request to http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi 1/18/2006 9:31:09 AM|rosetta@home|Reason: Requested by user 1/18/2006 9:31:09 AM|rosetta@home|Note: not requesting new work or reporting results 1/18/2006 9:31:14 AM|rosetta@home|Scheduler request to http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi succeeded 1/18/2006 9:34:41 AM|rosetta@home|Started download of 2reb_.fasta 1/18/2006 9:34:42 AM|rosetta@home|Temporarily failed download of 2reb_.fasta: error 500 1/18/2006 9:34:42 AM|rosetta@home|Backing off 3 hours, 10 minutes, and 16 seconds on download of file 2reb_.fasta |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Report stuck & aborted WU here please
(Message 8773)
Posted 11 Jan 2006 by ![]() Post: I have a Work Unit that is at 1% processed after 21 hours, 24 minutes and counting. Id: NO_BARCODE_FRAGS_2reb_227_9692_0. The other Work Units I have seem to be running fine in parrallel on this multi CPU computer. Should I abort or let it fail on its own? |
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org