1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Minirosetta 1.98
(Message 63772)
Posted 21 Oct 2009 by ![]() Post: This and other mini 1.98 WU's have been resource hogs lately. http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=287892484 |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.89
(Message 49776)
Posted 18 Dec 2007 by ![]() Post: Memory hog WU: 1b72__BOINC_TETHER_DURING_STAGE1_POSE_ABRELAX-1b72_-_2458_1145 |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.89
(Message 49754)
Posted 17 Dec 2007 by ![]() Post: So are we to assume that there are WU's coming that will have lower virtual memory requirements? The memory hogs are getting tired. Sorry, here it is below... 1cc8AWHS_ETABLE_SVM_TESTS-1cc8A-frags83__2452_282 |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.89
(Message 49750)
Posted 17 Dec 2007 by ![]() Post: So are we to assume that there are WU's coming that will have lower virtual memory requirements? The memory hogs are getting tired. |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.89
(Message 49736)
Posted 16 Dec 2007 by ![]() Post: Dealing with a memory hog on the WU I am running. |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.85 (or 5.86 for linux)
(Message 49238)
Posted 30 Nov 2007 by ![]() Post: I see things are back up. I hope the next version is a little easier on the page file. I like using R@H, but it's sapping resources left and right. |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.85 (or 5.86 for linux)
(Message 49128)
Posted 28 Nov 2007 by ![]() Post: How can you pick which version of Rosetta to run? E.g. 5.82 vs. 5.85 |
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org