frequent "Computation Error"s

Message boards : Number crunching : frequent "Computation Error"s

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
zxcvbob

Send message
Joined: 4 Jan 06
Posts: 8
Credit: 830,878
RAC: 0
Message 9382 - Posted: 19 Jan 2006, 20:59:26 UTC

...but only with Rosetta@home. I have 2 of them on my machine right now.

I also run Predictor and it doesn't have these problems (it just has problems with the project going down, etc.)

Best regards,
Bob
ID: 9382 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile carl.h
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Dec 05
Posts: 555
Credit: 183,449
RAC: 0
Message 9385 - Posted: 19 Jan 2006, 21:26:01 UTC

You may find one or two of these, they are nothing to worry about at present, we`ve all had a share. They are becoming less frequent now !
Not all Czech`s bounce but I`d like to try with Barbar ;-)

Make no mistake This IS the TEDDIES TEAM.
ID: 9385 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Melanie

Send message
Joined: 16 Jan 06
Posts: 1
Credit: 6,126
RAC: 0
Message 9725 - Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 20:11:54 UTC

I have been experiencing this problem with between 90-95% of my WU, what happens with the credits in this situation?
ID: 9725 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Ricky@SETI.USA
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Dec 05
Posts: 20
Credit: 97,355
RAC: 0
Message 9728 - Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 20:35:49 UTC - in response to Message 9382.  

...but only with Rosetta@home. I have 2 of them on my machine right now.

I also run Predictor and it doesn't have these problems (it just has problems with the project going down, etc.)

Best regards,
Bob


I just had two Computation errors on my PC too.

Speaking of P@H.... I get very little work from them. In fact last WU's from them was a week ago!

"Life is like an Ice Cream cone, just when you think you got it licked, it drips all over you!"

ID: 9728 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
J.D. Morgan

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 05
Posts: 3
Credit: 381,518
RAC: 57
Message 9743 - Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 23:48:42 UTC

I had the majority of my Rosetta workunits failing until I selected "Yes" for "Leave applications in memory while preempted?" in General Preferences.

This problem and solution have been reported here previously. On my machines, it only seems to affect Rosetta, as I've never had any problems with other BOINC apps. If I turn this preference off, those other apps still complete successfully, while Rosetta throws a memory protection violation error.

I'd like to see a fix, as leaving all of these apps in memory causes more virtual memory swapping while I'm working. But I'm putting up with this bug in the name of science... ;)

Jim
ID: 9743 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Reaper13

Send message
Joined: 10 Nov 05
Posts: 3
Credit: 74,001
RAC: 0
Message 9829 - Posted: 25 Jan 2006, 17:54:45 UTC

I have had three in the past 24 hours. Not sure why, I will try the leaving apps in memory thing and see how it goes.
ID: 9829 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
eeqmc2_52

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 05
Posts: 1
Credit: 311,509
RAC: 0
Message 10216 - Posted: 30 Jan 2006, 3:47:11 UTC - in response to Message 9743.  

I had the majority of my Rosetta workunits failing until I selected "Yes" for "Leave applications in memory while preempted?" in General Preferences.

This problem and solution have been reported here previously. On my machines, it only seems to affect Rosetta, as I've never had any problems with other BOINC apps. If I turn this preference off, those other apps still complete successfully, while Rosetta throws a memory protection violation error.

I'd like to see a fix, as leaving all of these apps in memory causes more virtual memory swapping while I'm working. But I'm putting up with this bug in the name of science... ;)

Jim


Leaving the application in memory while preempted fixed all my "computational" errors. Thanks for sharing the fix!!!!! This has been annoying me for months.
ID: 10216 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
keputnam

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 05
Posts: 24
Credit: 2,084,465
RAC: 0
Message 10239 - Posted: 30 Jan 2006, 23:16:53 UTC

I've got one machine PIII/1Ghz/Win2K that has errored every WU it got in the past week.

All my other machines have a few, occasional, errors. They range from PII/400/Win98se to a mix of P4/W2K to a P4/3.0/XPPro - All set to "Leave in Memory"

For the life of me, I cannot figure out why the one W2K machine has problems

ID: 10239 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
J.D. Morgan

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 05
Posts: 3
Credit: 381,518
RAC: 57
Message 10245 - Posted: 31 Jan 2006, 4:27:10 UTC - in response to Message 10216.  

Leaving the application in memory while preempted fixed all my "computational" errors. Thanks for sharing the fix!!!!! This has been annoying me for months.


This is actually posted as a system requirement for Rosetta.

The main problem is that this is a global BOINC setting, so if you run multiple applications, they *all* must stay memory-resident. I hope that the Rosetta development team will consider more-frequent checkpointing so that this requirement can be dropped.

Jim
ID: 10245 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile nasher

Send message
Joined: 5 Nov 05
Posts: 98
Credit: 618,288
RAC: 0
Message 10251 - Posted: 31 Jan 2006, 9:06:31 UTC - in response to Message 10245.  


The main problem is that this is a global BOINC setting, so if you run multiple applications, they *all* must stay memory-resident. I hope that the Rosetta development team will consider more-frequent checkpointing so that this requirement can be dropped.

Jim


i know this was one of the things on there to do list.

personaly i have normaly 5 or so projects on each computer and i dont have a problem with leave in memory for me at least. but yes it would be nice to have this changed so you didnt HAVE to leave in memory.

ID: 10251 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
truckpuller

Send message
Joined: 5 Nov 05
Posts: 40
Credit: 229,134
RAC: 0
Message 10299 - Posted: 1 Feb 2006, 2:57:11 UTC

I just had 7 jobs and out of the 7 had 4 computation errors and have all mine set to leave in memory also just checked again and have another one says computation error. thanks
Visit us at Christianboards.org
ID: 10299 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile mendez

Send message
Joined: 18 Oct 05
Posts: 1
Credit: 2,087,596
RAC: 0
Message 10523 - Posted: 7 Feb 2006, 1:35:48 UTC

I have been getting those Computation Error messages too.
Only rosetta@home throws them. Other applications seem to run smoothly.
I am implementing the tip thrown by peers here on leaving applications in memory and waiting for a couple of units to flow.
I suppose this is a local mishap.
right?

regards.


ID: 10523 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile nasher

Send message
Joined: 5 Nov 05
Posts: 98
Credit: 618,288
RAC: 0
Message 10555 - Posted: 8 Feb 2006, 3:17:04 UTC

actualy LEAVE in MEMORY is a system requirement it is not a patch or fix.. its a requirement. im wondering how many people dont realize this?
ID: 10555 · Rating: -1 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Keck_Komputers
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 211
Credit: 4,246,150
RAC: 0
Message 10559 - Posted: 8 Feb 2006, 4:33:50 UTC - in response to Message 10555.  

actualy LEAVE in MEMORY is a system requirement it is not a patch or fix.. its a requirement. im wondering how many people dont realize this?

Leave in memory is a workaround for a bug. Hopefully the project staff will get this bug fixed eventually.
BOINC WIKI

BOINCing since 2002/12/8
ID: 10559 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
FluffyChicken
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Nov 05
Posts: 1260
Credit: 369,635
RAC: 0
Message 10598 - Posted: 9 Feb 2006, 18:46:14 UTC - in response to Message 10555.  

actualy LEAVE in MEMORY is a system requirement it is not a patch or fix.. its a requirement. im wondering how many people dont realize this?


If it was an actual requirement (rather than a work around ;)) then it shouldn't be an option to disable it...
ID: 10598 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Andrew

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 05
Posts: 162
Credit: 105,512
RAC: 0
Message 10599 - Posted: 9 Feb 2006, 19:26:08 UTC - in response to Message 10598.  
Last modified: 9 Feb 2006, 19:26:43 UTC

If it was an actual requirement (rather than a work around ;)) then it shouldn't be an option to disable it...


Question:

since this option is in the general preferences can a project diable the option when other projects allow it?
ID: 10599 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Roelof

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 05
Posts: 1
Credit: 455,867
RAC: 0
Message 10661 - Posted: 11 Feb 2006, 15:42:25 UTC

Just saw this...

Is this where this toppic is all about?

I just added a new project and now this started to happen...

11-2-2006 16:29:46|SZTAKI Desktop Grid|Successfully attached to SZTAKI Desktop Grid
[...] and a little later....
11-2-2006 16:29:57||request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded
11-2-2006 16:29:57|rosetta@home|Pausing result BARCODE_30_1cc8A_299_27508_1 (removed from memory)
11-2-2006 16:29:57|boincsimap|Starting result 200602093.006054_0 using simap version 507
11-2-2006 16:29:58|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1cc8A_299_27508_1 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))
11-2-2006 16:29:58||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
11-2-2006 16:29:58|rosetta@home|Computation for result BARCODE_30_1cc8A_299_27508_1 finished

I used to have the leave in memory setting on, but it seems now it is off... How did that happen?

this is what was in the log earlier today:
11-2-2006 7:45:57||request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded
11-2-2006 7:45:57|rosetta@home|Pausing result BARCODE_30_1fna__299_27475_0 (left in memory)
11-2-2006 7:45:58|SETI@home|Starting result 12dc03ab.10273.9408.128420.1.68_0 using setiathome version 418
11-2-2006 9:15:58|rosetta@home|Resuming result BARCODE_30_1fna__299_27475_0 using rosetta version 481
11-2-2006 9:15:58|SETI@home|Pausing result 12dc03ab.10273.9408.128420.1.68_0 (left in memory)
11-2-2006 9:21:58||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
11-2-2006 9:21:58|rosetta@home|Computation for result BARCODE_30_1fna__299_27475_0 finished

ID: 10661 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Angus

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 412
Credit: 321,053
RAC: 0
Message 10667 - Posted: 11 Feb 2006, 19:17:13 UTC - in response to Message 10661.  

You will need to set "leave in memory" on all projects. It is a global preference, so the last project you have contacted that had general preference updates will overrule whatever you had previously set. In this case, not changing it at SZTAKI overwrote your Rosetta preference.
Just another BOINC-ism that wasn't exactly thought through.
Just saw this...

Is this where this toppic is all about?

I just added a new project and now this started to happen...

11-2-2006 16:29:46|SZTAKI Desktop Grid|Successfully attached to SZTAKI Desktop Grid
[...] and a little later....
11-2-2006 16:29:57||request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded
11-2-2006 16:29:57|rosetta@home|Pausing result BARCODE_30_1cc8A_299_27508_1 (removed from memory)
11-2-2006 16:29:57|boincsimap|Starting result 200602093.006054_0 using simap version 507
11-2-2006 16:29:58|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1cc8A_299_27508_1 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))
11-2-2006 16:29:58||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
11-2-2006 16:29:58|rosetta@home|Computation for result BARCODE_30_1cc8A_299_27508_1 finished

I used to have the leave in memory setting on, but it seems now it is off... How did that happen?

this is what was in the log earlier today:
11-2-2006 7:45:57||request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded
11-2-2006 7:45:57|rosetta@home|Pausing result BARCODE_30_1fna__299_27475_0 (left in memory)
11-2-2006 7:45:58|SETI@home|Starting result 12dc03ab.10273.9408.128420.1.68_0 using setiathome version 418
11-2-2006 9:15:58|rosetta@home|Resuming result BARCODE_30_1fna__299_27475_0 using rosetta version 481
11-2-2006 9:15:58|SETI@home|Pausing result 12dc03ab.10273.9408.128420.1.68_0 (left in memory)
11-2-2006 9:21:58||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
11-2-2006 9:21:58|rosetta@home|Computation for result BARCODE_30_1fna__299_27475_0 finished


Proudly Banned from Predictator@Home and now Cosmology@home as well. Added SETI to the list today. Temporary ban only - so need to work harder :)



"You can't fix stupid" (Ron White)
ID: 10667 · Rating: -1 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : frequent "Computation Error"s



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org