Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
Previous · 1 . . . 325 · 326 · 327 · 328
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1804 Credit: 18,534,891 RAC: 2 |
Need about a million tasks to keep us busy for any length of time.There are 8.9 million Tasks queued up right now waiting to be processed. It had been 10 million+ for quite a while. However until they fix their server systems so that the amount Ready to send is more than 0 for more than an hour or two each day (it used to be 5,000) and the Assimilators can keep up, there will continue to be millions of Tasks waiting to be processed for some time to come. Then of course fixing up their DNS & download sever issues would then allow even more people to process work without having to screw around with what should be completely un-necessary Hosts file settings. But considering the download server has been an issue for most of this year (if not longer), i don't hold out any real hope of anything being fixed. Give it another month or so and there will be so many server issues that Researchers will probably keep sending out work to be processed, but have no idea why they aren't getting any results beck- because no one can download any, and if they could they still can't get any allocated to be downloaded. The stupidity of this situation is reaching mind boggling levels of ridiculousness. Grant Darwin NT |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5727 Credit: 5,968,085 RAC: 1,692 ![]() |
I had added one of the lines (I did not see two lines at the time) to Windows 10 hosts file and it had solved a problem. Are we running the same version of windows? I have 64bit pro and my version is 22h2 |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5727 Credit: 5,968,085 RAC: 1,692 ![]() |
Need about a million tasks to keep us busy for any length of time.There are 8.9 million Tasks queued up right now waiting to be processed. It had been 10 million+ for quite a while. In Robetta, there are things called structure prediction and domain prediction. Whats the difference? And then some of the tasks are listed with username Rosettafold, who are the rest? |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1804 Credit: 18,534,891 RAC: 2 |
I had added one of the lines (I did not see two lines at the time) to Windows 10 hosts file and it had solved a problem.Nothing should be playing with your Hosts file, however some sort of AV/Antimalware programme may be configured to "protect" it , and once it notices that it's changed, it reverts it back to whatever it considers to be the correct Hosts file. No Widows update that i can think of has ever had anything to do with the Hosts file. Grant Darwin NT |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1804 Credit: 18,534,891 RAC: 2 |
In Robetta, there are things called structure prediction and domain prediction. Whats the difference?Not a clue. Grant Darwin NT |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5727 Credit: 5,968,085 RAC: 1,692 ![]() |
In Robetta, there are things called structure prediction and domain prediction. Whats the difference?Not a clue. Well that is why I question the "millions" of tasks waiting. Because I think some of them are processed with different machine(s) than ours. Otherwise we would have work coming out our ears. I could never really understand Robetta. Is it a server or is a processor or a work generator based on proteins they think need to be examined. And with 78,000 tasks given to 14,340 systems containing an average of how many cores each....the work they put out is gone in a heartbeat. Maybe they run out the queue for a specific protein and then up load the rest. |
Dr Who Fan![]() Send message Joined: 28 May 06 Posts: 92 Credit: 284,503 RAC: 107 |
Nothing should be playing with your Hosts file, however some sort of AV/Antimalware programme may be configured to "protect" it , and once it notices that it's changed, it reverts it back to whatever it considers to be the correct Hosts file. On my Windows 8.1 system I had a similar problem of host file being blank or reverting to the Windows default after applying some custom configs... Discovered it was Microsoft Windows Defender Antivirus protection thinking it was a 'virus' making changes. Solve problem by EXCLUDING file from being auto scanned. |
Dr Who Fan![]() Send message Joined: 28 May 06 Posts: 92 Credit: 284,503 RAC: 107 |
.dupe. |
Dr Who Fan![]() Send message Joined: 28 May 06 Posts: 92 Credit: 284,503 RAC: 107 |
.dupe. |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1804 Credit: 18,534,891 RAC: 2 |
Well that is why I question the "millions" of tasks waiting. Because I think some of them are processed with different machine(s) than ours. Otherwise we would have work coming out our ears.As i have pointed out multiple times- we have millions of Tasks Queued up to be processed- as shown on the Home page. But there are issues with the Servers, so they are not being moved to the Ready to send so we can't be allocated them so we can't process them, which is why there are still so many of them sitting there after over a week of increased system issues. If they were being processed by other systems, they would all be gone by now. If we were able to process them, they would all be gone by now. Along with the Download server issue, and the IPv6 issue, there are also Assimilator issues, along with the problem with the Feeder not feeding the Ready to send buffer. Grant Darwin NT |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5727 Credit: 5,968,085 RAC: 1,692 ![]() |
Well that is why I question the "millions" of tasks waiting. Because I think some of them are processed with different machine(s) than ours. Otherwise we would have work coming out our ears.As i have pointed out multiple times- we have millions of Tasks Queued up to be processed- as shown on the Home page. Hah! And they call this a cutting edge project. It took GPUgrid to move and sort out its problems in 3 weeks to a month and they are younger than this project. This is beginning to sound like a poor WCG after they moved. The real question is does Baker Lab care anymore or do they not have enough staff or what? That they ignore emails says a lot. How long have we had this problem of sporadic tasks and other time frames of no work? Years I think. So where the he11 is everyone? |
![]() Send message Joined: 11 May 20 Posts: 3 Credit: 1,339,392 RAC: 17,660 ![]() |
Lines added to host, still receiving message: "feeder not running". |
Dr Who Fan![]() Send message Joined: 28 May 06 Posts: 92 Credit: 284,503 RAC: 107 |
This is beginning to sound like a poor WCG after they moved. It's been several years of seeing project "owner" David Baker post anything and as you can see by browsing the forums, no one else is tending to the ship as it sinks deeper into the abyss. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Nov 05 Posts: 13 Credit: 245,648 RAC: 313 |
Thank you for that info. I disabled IPv6 and got two Rosetta tasks instantly. (^: ![]() |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2293 Credit: 43,196,721 RAC: 26,110 ![]() |
Well that is why I question the "millions" of tasks waiting. Because I think some of them are processed with different machine(s) than ours. Otherwise we would have work coming out our ears.As I have pointed out multiple times- we have millions of Tasks Queued up to be processed- as shown on the Home page. Greg, you're working yourself up into one of your tantrums again, which is how you ended up departing for a few years until recently. I know you have high expectations from the projects you give your time to, which is why I tried to make clear to you when you returned in January that while task availability was still very far from perfect, being here was workable with a little patience and effort. Since then we've had the security cert expiry issue, the IPv6 issue and the go-slow of bwsrv1 - all of which, I completely accept, are highly annoying, but with the ingenuity of other users here we've found our way through it. That's certainly not ideal and certainly doesn't meet your high expectations, but most of us accept this is what this project has become without constantly harking back to a past that's long gone. This project certainly is cutting-edge, but for the science it works on, not ever for its forum-responsiveness or for its server management performance. Rosetta has always had a very small team dealing with its admin - that's your 'everyone'. Boboviz posts regularly on the new features they're constantly developing. That's what they're focussing on. It would be ridiculous if they distracted themselves from their nobel-prize-winning research to monitor their forums or servers. In the short time I did have someone's attention, it was made very clear to me the tail does not wag the dog at this project, nor ever will it. That's because what they care about is 99.99% their research and 0.01% their overhead, which is what we are. That's not the same as what happened at WCG, where IBM effectively abandoned it to a small group who hoped for much more than they were ever capable of delivering. If you don't want to continue to offer your time here, that's up to you. Your expectations won't realistically be met except through the regular expertise and generosity of other users here. But istm the worst of all worlds is understanding/accepting that while simultaneously whining about it several times a week. That gets us nowhere. ![]() ![]() |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org