Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home

Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 105 · 106 · 107 · 108 · 109 · 110 · 111 . . . 309 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 2002
Credit: 9,780,807
RAC: 5,492
Message 101599 - Posted: 29 Apr 2021, 14:09:30 UTC - in response to Message 101595.  

At the very least take this rubbish out of the Problems and Technical Issues thread.

+1
ID: 101599 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 2002
Credit: 9,780,807
RAC: 5,492
Message 101601 - Posted: 29 Apr 2021, 18:53:25 UTC

Strange wu.
My default runtime is 4hs, this runned for 6 minutes, so i think it's an error, but, it's valid and i have credits!
And this message:

ERROR: [ERROR] Unable to open constraints file: db08f1133c74236d0c58df582581b793_0001.MSAcst
ERROR:: Exit from: ......srccorescoringconstraintsConstraintIO.cc line: 457
20:50:33 (11632): called boinc_finish(0)

ID: 101601 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mr P Hucker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 06
Posts: 1600
Credit: 12,116,986
RAC: 9,863
Message 101602 - Posted: 29 Apr 2021, 19:00:50 UTC - in response to Message 101588.  

The world is overpopulated, I don't cry at the loss of nutters.
You are truly a POS
I'm a realist. Remove the religion and no more wars. Halve the population and no more resource shortages, or alledged climate change.
ID: 101602 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mr P Hucker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 06
Posts: 1600
Credit: 12,116,986
RAC: 9,863
Message 101603 - Posted: 29 Apr 2021, 19:04:17 UTC - in response to Message 101590.  
Last modified: 29 Apr 2021, 19:04:39 UTC

You want to be protected, then you take precautions, don't expect me to do it for you. You can wear a mask and get a vaccine and be a pansy if you desire, I don't have to do it for you.
Shame on you. Shame on you.
A lot of people cannot be vaccined (immunosuppressed, severe allergy sufferers, etc) and i want to protect them.
I don't, they're the weakest of the flock anyway. And they don't have to come near me.
ACTUALLY that's not 100% true, some perfectly healthy people who ran marathons are now dead from Covid, there are very sick people who got Covid and recovered. So being sick doesn't seem to matter if you get Covid or not although if you are already sick it CAN be the stick that broke the camels back and overwhelm your system enough to kill you, alot like people with AIDS and then catch the flu or even a cold can die.

Did you also know that people with Type O blood have a smaller likelihood of getting Covid, and dieing if they do get it, than those with Type A or B blood or some combination of A and B blood types? This has caused some of the people who believe in Aliens to theorize that the Aliens are trying to thin the herd a bit, the group thinking like this is extremely small as you might think it would be. Alot like the people who think the flu is WORSE than getting Covid or the chances of getting the flu is higher than getting Covid.
The virus is part of evolution. No matter what it is that makes most of us immune, that needs to be in all of us to protect us from future viruses. Those who don't have it are being deleted.

I just got a letter giving me the date and time to get my jab. And a number to call if I want to change it, but no number to call if I don't want it. So I'll just ignore it and have them waste time waiting for me. The leaflet with the letter actually admitted that it's very likely to experience horrid symptoms (eg flu for 2 days). Definitely taking my chances with probably not getting the virus, rather than definitely having a high risk of that.
ID: 101603 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mr P Hucker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 06
Posts: 1600
Credit: 12,116,986
RAC: 9,863
Message 101604 - Posted: 29 Apr 2021, 19:13:03 UTC - in response to Message 101591.  

No, cancer deaths are longer, more drawn out, and therefore worse. You can't say it's not a cancer death just because you lived a few years after getting it.
All deaths take the same amount of time - a moment.
What an absurd thing to say. So if I stab you with a knife and you bleed to death over a 3 hour period, you would say you died instantly? I guess that's a humane killing then.

What you're talking about is living with cancer.
I guess we could kill people with cancer within 28 days to reduce their suffering and help solve overpopulation at the same time. Win-win
Well we should certainly stop wasting resources keeping people alive when they have no chance of recovering, especially when it's government money, stolen from your taxes.

If I can't say it's not a cancer death if it's more than 28 days after diagnosis, why don't we count CV19 deaths after 28 days? Slightly changes that proportion figure you mentioned.
Because coronavirus doesn't take so long to kill, as I've already explained.

A study in Leicester, UK found that 30% of people released from hospital after Covid treatment were readmitted within 5 months, and 12% of them died, none of which are counted in the UK total as they're more than 28 days from original diagnosis.
Does the study account for all the people who caught it, probably didn't even know they had it, and never went to a hospital?

Don't need to. It's published every day in the UK.
Infections confirmed: 4.41m
Hospitalisations: 462k - 1 in 9.5
ONS Deaths: 152,425 - 1 in 28.9 - not counting those re-hospitalised then die after more than 28 days (12% of 30% of survivors, approx 11.1k), nor those who died without any formal test (ONS estimate 12,900)

Over all, deaths <due> to Covid19 (not just <involving> Covid) in the whole UK since March 2020, whether infected or not, is 1 in 378
If the lottery had odds like that, I'd expect to win once <every> year

Edit: Cancer deaths can't be 4x CV19 deaths anyway. If 152k are CV19 and 614k total died in E&W last year (inc CV19) <all> the non-CV19 deaths only amount to 3x and I'm pretty sure lots of people died of things that were neither CV19 nor Cancer.
I'm now assuming you made your number up - which is so often the way in these kind of discussions...
No, I used a reliable source of information.
Total virus deaths (in the one year it's been around) = 3,163,531
9.6 million cancer deaths worldwide in 2012
Tell me, is 3,163,531 or 9,600,000 a bigger number?
ID: 101604 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mr P Hucker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 06
Posts: 1600
Credit: 12,116,986
RAC: 9,863
Message 101605 - Posted: 29 Apr 2021, 19:13:43 UTC - in response to Message 101593.  

You want to be protected, then you take precautions, don't expect me to do it for you. You can wear a mask and get a vaccine and be a pansy if you desire, I don't have to do it for you.
Shame on you. Shame on you.
A lot of people cannot be vaccined (immunosuppressed, severe allergy sufferers, etc) and i want to protect them.
I don't, they're the weakest of the flock anyway. And they don't have to come near me.
Can anyone ban this guy from forum, please?
Use the block function and stop being such a pathetic little girl.
ID: 101605 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mrhastyrib

Send message
Joined: 18 Feb 21
Posts: 90
Credit: 2,541,890
RAC: 0
Message 101607 - Posted: 29 Apr 2021, 22:24:08 UTC - in response to Message 101593.  
Last modified: 29 Apr 2021, 22:39:17 UTC

Can anyone ban this guy from forum, please?
I don't support this.

Social media, which is the anus of humanity, has enabled the ability to distill groups of people to a uniform political ideology. That in my view has been the engine of partisanship.

We need to see the Peter Huffers of the world and they need to be able to see us.
ID: 101607 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mrhastyrib

Send message
Joined: 18 Feb 21
Posts: 90
Credit: 2,541,890
RAC: 0
Message 101608 - Posted: 29 Apr 2021, 22:33:13 UTC - in response to Message 101602.  
Last modified: 29 Apr 2021, 22:39:05 UTC

I'm a realist.
Listen…I realize that your life is such a total failure in every conceivable way that you have to make up some self-defensive fantasy that you are actually elevated and enlightened. The rest of us don't appreciate you, not because you are a POS, but being peasants we can't appreciate how superior you are, even though Dunning-Kruger doesn't exist.

But to me, and apparently to others here, you're just a POS. Deal with it.
ID: 101608 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mrhastyrib

Send message
Joined: 18 Feb 21
Posts: 90
Credit: 2,541,890
RAC: 0
Message 101609 - Posted: 29 Apr 2021, 22:38:48 UTC - in response to Message 101603.  

it's very likely to experience horrid symptoms (eg flu for 2 days).
stop being such a pathetic little girl.
The posts just write themselves these days.
ID: 101609 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mrhastyrib

Send message
Joined: 18 Feb 21
Posts: 90
Credit: 2,541,890
RAC: 0
Message 101610 - Posted: 29 Apr 2021, 22:49:57 UTC - in response to Message 101604.  
Last modified: 29 Apr 2021, 22:52:37 UTC

Tell me, is 3,163,531 or 9,600,000 a bigger number?
In 2020, 1,806,590 new cancer cases and 606,520 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. That's compared to roughly 500k deaths from COVID over about 9 months.

How about we compare apples to apples, rather than 2012 oranges?

Not only are you a POS, but you are a dishonest POS. Not like it matters anyway. The two things are completely unalike.
ID: 101610 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sid Celery

Send message
Joined: 11 Feb 08
Posts: 2140
Credit: 41,518,559
RAC: 10,612
Message 101611 - Posted: 30 Apr 2021, 1:48:50 UTC - in response to Message 101604.  
Last modified: 30 Apr 2021, 1:49:42 UTC

If I can't say it's not a cancer death if it's more than 28 days after diagnosis, why don't we count CV19 deaths after 28 days? Slightly changes that proportion figure you mentioned.
Because coronavirus doesn't take so long to kill, as I've already explained.

Because Coronavirus is many multiple times more deadly.
And "cancer" is a generic name for a whole variety of different ailments. I'm currently on my 2nd one. No-one ever died of either of them - both benign.

A study in Leicester, UK found that 30% of people released from hospital after Covid treatment were readmitted within 5 months, and 12% of them died, none of which are counted in the UK total as they're more than 28 days from original diagnosis.
Does the study account for all the people who caught it, probably didn't even know they had it, and never went to a hospital?

Don't need to. It's published every day in the UK.
Infections confirmed: 4.41m
Hospitalisations: 462k - 1 in 9.5
ONS Deaths: 152,425 - 1 in 28.9 - not counting those re-hospitalised then die after more than 28 days (12% of 30% of survivors, approx 11.1k), nor those who died without any formal test (ONS estimate 12,900)

Over all, deaths <due> to Covid19 (not just <involving> Covid) in the whole UK since March 2020, whether infected or not, is 1 in 378
If the lottery had odds like that, I'd expect to win once <every> year

Edit: Cancer deaths can't be 4x CV19 deaths anyway. If 152k are CV19 and 614k total died in E&W last year (inc CV19) <all> the non-CV19 deaths only amount to 3x and I'm pretty sure lots of people died of things that were neither CV19 nor Cancer.
I'm now assuming you made your number up - which is so often the way in these kind of discussions...
No, I used a reliable source of information.
Total virus deaths (in the one year it's been around) = 3,163,531
9.6 million cancer deaths worldwide in 2012
Tell me, is 3,163,531 or 9,600,000 a bigger number?

Worldometer isn't reliable for anything.
9.6m is the result of many years of cancers. 3.1m is only the count of deaths within 28 days over 1 year and is unreliable anyway.
The UK count is one of the best and we know it's 40% understated. In India currently they're talking about deaths being 200-500% understated. And I'm pretty sure N.Korea is understated at zero, as is China's made up number.
And with your own numbers, I'm pretty sure 9.6m isn't 4x 3.1m as you claimed at the start, so thanks for confirming you were wrong even by your own dodgy measure.

Still, I'm sure everything else you said was meticulously accurate
ID: 101611 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mikey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 06
Posts: 1895
Credit: 9,214,047
RAC: 1,450
Message 101612 - Posted: 30 Apr 2021, 2:50:24 UTC - in response to Message 101611.  


Worldometer isn't reliable for anything.
9.6m is the result of many years of cancers. 3.1m is only the count of deaths within 28 days over 1 year and is unreliable anyway.
The UK count is one of the best and we know it's 40% understated. In India currently they're talking about deaths being 200-500% understated. And I'm pretty sure N.Korea is understated at zero, as is China's made up number.
And with your own numbers, I'm pretty sure 9.6m isn't 4x 3.1m as you claimed at the start, so thanks for confirming you were wrong even by your own dodgy measure.

Still, I'm sure everything else you said was meticulously accurate


China is far from the only Country not reporting or under-reporting their Covid numbers...North Korea has had ZERO Covid deaths, and Russia refuses to give any kind of numbers that can be verified, there are also many African Countries that also refuse to acknowledge that Covid is killing their people. The WorldWide deaths from Covid are estimated by experts to be at least double what's being reported.

The US on the other hand could be over-reporting their Covid death numbers due to the Government paying money to the ER's etc for the PPE etc used to care for a sick Covid pt and leading those places to test everyone for Covid and calling it a 'Covid death' even if the pt actually died of a gunshot wound because they had Covid when they died. Then of course the US has the New York State scandal with the nursing homes not calling them Covid deaths because it made the nursing homes seem 'dangerous'.

Thinking Covid is nothing to worry about is not using the facts at hand and thinking that getting the vaccine is worse than getting Covid is also just wrong. Sure some people get under the weather for a few days after getting the vaccine but the older you are the less likely that is to happen due the body being exposed to sooo many things over the course of their lives. No one is immune to Covid and anyone can get it from the silliest little thing, the gas pump handle, the door knob that the neighbor kid just rattled to scare or bother you, walking thru an area with still air after someone with Covid has walked thru that same area., drinking from a poorly washed mug or cup at the local bar, how many times have you gone into a public bathroom and watched someone pee and walk out without washing their hands?
ID: 101612 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 2002
Credit: 9,780,807
RAC: 5,492
Message 101613 - Posted: 30 Apr 2021, 5:45:18 UTC - in response to Message 101607.  
Last modified: 30 Apr 2021, 5:45:51 UTC

Can anyone ban this guy from forum, please?
I don't support this.


I don't think so.
Ignorance has never help the evolution of mankind
I report to moderators the post where i'm "a patetic little girl".
ID: 101613 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mr P Hucker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 06
Posts: 1600
Credit: 12,116,986
RAC: 9,863
Message 101617 - Posted: 30 Apr 2021, 10:49:13 UTC - in response to Message 101607.  

Can anyone ban this guy from forum, please?
I don't support this.

Social media, which is the anus of humanity, has enabled the ability to distill groups of people to a uniform political ideology. That in my view has been the engine of partisanship.

We need to see the Peter Huffers of the world and they need to be able to see us.
At least you agree with Freedom of Speech, you're getting there. Now read the rest of the policies of the Libertarians and enlighten yourself. No not Liberals, Libertarians.

I'm a realist.
Listen…I realize that your life is such a total failure in every conceivable way that you have to make up some self-defensive fantasy that you are actually elevated and enlightened. The rest of us don't appreciate you, not because you are a POS, but being peasants we can't appreciate how superior you are, even though Dunning-Kruger doesn't exist.

But to me, and apparently to others here, you're just a POS. Deal with it.
I'm not a failure, you're the failure for being scared of a virus. I take it you're scared of spiders too?

it's very likely to experience horrid symptoms (eg flu for 2 days).
stop being such a pathetic little girl.
The posts just write themselves these days.
Why would I deliberately give myself symptoms? No it wouldn't be the end of the world, but neither would the virus I probably won't catch.

Tell me, is 3,163,531 or 9,600,000 a bigger number?
In 2020, 1,806,590 new cancer cases and 606,520 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. That's compared to roughly 500k deaths from COVID over about 9 months.

How about we compare apples to apples, rather than 2012 oranges?

Not only are you a POS, but you are a dishonest POS. Not like it matters anyway. The two things are completely unalike.
Do you really think the cancer rate dropped significantly in 10 years? And why are you concentrating only on the US? Yes I know, Americans don't realise there's a world outside their own country. It's just a desert full of Arabs and oil for you to steal.
ID: 101617 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mr P Hucker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 06
Posts: 1600
Credit: 12,116,986
RAC: 9,863
Message 101618 - Posted: 30 Apr 2021, 10:55:22 UTC - in response to Message 101611.  

If I can't say it's not a cancer death if it's more than 28 days after diagnosis, why don't we count CV19 deaths after 28 days? Slightly changes that proportion figure you mentioned.
Because coronavirus doesn't take so long to kill, as I've already explained.

Because Coronavirus is many multiple times more deadly.
And "cancer" is a generic name for a whole variety of different ailments. I'm currently on my 2nd one. No-one ever died of either of them - both benign.
There are many deadly cancers. and those are the ones I'm talking about and have posted stats for. Coronavirus isn't deadly. Most get no symptoms. Most of those that do feel like they've got the flu. The leaders of both the UK and USA governments had it and survived. And neither of those were particularly healthy.

No, I used a reliable source of information.
Total virus deaths (in the one year it's been around) = 3,163,531
9.6 million cancer deaths worldwide in 2012
Tell me, is 3,163,531 or 9,600,000 a bigger number?

Worldometer isn't reliable for anything.
9.6m is the result of many years of cancers. 3.1m is only the count of deaths within 28 days over 1 year and is unreliable anyway.
The UK count is one of the best and we know it's 40% understated. In India currently they're talking about deaths being 200-500% understated. And I'm pretty sure N.Korea is understated at zero, as is China's made up number.
And with your own numbers, I'm pretty sure 9.6m isn't 4x 3.1m as you claimed at the start, so thanks for confirming you were wrong even by your own dodgy measure.

Still, I'm sure everything else you said was meticulously accurate
Worldometer states facts, not government biased stuff to make sheep do what they say. And 9.6m is for ONE YEAR, I explained that. 9.6 is roughly 4x3.1, the last time (2 months ago) I checked the variable figures it was closer to 4. It's certainly a much larger number than 3.1. So worry about the 9.6, not the 3.1. You are far more likely to die of cancer. As for the numbers being understated, I disagree. They're overstated. How many people catch it, don't get symptoms (or just mild ones) and don't report it? More of us are immune than the hospitals think.
ID: 101618 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mr P Hucker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 06
Posts: 1600
Credit: 12,116,986
RAC: 9,863
Message 101619 - Posted: 30 Apr 2021, 10:55:54 UTC - in response to Message 101613.  
Last modified: 30 Apr 2021, 10:56:37 UTC

Can anyone ban this guy from forum, please?
I don't support this.
I don't think so.
Ignorance has never help the evolution of mankind
I report to moderators the post where i'm "a patetic little girl".
Which only goes to prove you are one. Awww were you bullied at school? Were you the one that told the teachers when there was a fight everyone else was enjoying?
ID: 101619 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mr P Hucker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 06
Posts: 1600
Credit: 12,116,986
RAC: 9,863
Message 101620 - Posted: 30 Apr 2021, 11:01:32 UTC - in response to Message 101612.  

China is far from the only Country not reporting or under-reporting their Covid numbers...North Korea has had ZERO Covid deaths, and Russia refuses to give any kind of numbers that can be verified, there are also many African Countries that also refuse to acknowledge that Covid is killing their people. The WorldWide deaths from Covid are estimated by experts to be at least double what's being reported.
Maybe those countries aren't so girly? Russians are a tough lot and won't go crying to the UN because a few people die.

The US on the other hand could be over-reporting their Covid death numbers due to the Government paying money to the ER's etc for the PPE etc used to care for a sick Covid pt and leading those places to test everyone for Covid and calling it a 'Covid death' even if the pt actually died of a gunshot wound because they had Covid when they died.
Well you gotta change those gun death stats somehow, they're embarrassing! Why not make a fuss about those instead of the virus and ban guns?

Thinking Covid is nothing to worry about is not using the facts at hand and thinking that getting the vaccine is worse than getting Covid is also just wrong. Sure some people get under the weather for a few days after getting the vaccine but the older you are the less likely that is to happen due the body being exposed to sooo many things over the course of their lives. No one is immune to Covid
Incorrect. There was a cruise liner that was quarantined right at the start of all this. 80% of people never even got symptoms, even though every single person caught it. Plus there's those that got symptoms but survived.

and anyone can get it from the silliest little thing, the gas pump handle, the door knob that the neighbor kid just rattled to scare or bother you, walking thru an area with still air after someone with Covid has walked thru that same area., drinking from a poorly washed mug or cup at the local bar, how many times have you gone into a public bathroom and watched someone pee and walk out without washing their hands?
You claim that, but everyone is concentrating on masks. The postmen wear masks or distance themselves, but hand you a parcel.
ID: 101620 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sid Celery

Send message
Joined: 11 Feb 08
Posts: 2140
Credit: 41,518,559
RAC: 10,612
Message 101623 - Posted: 30 Apr 2021, 12:34:37 UTC - in response to Message 101618.  

Worldometer isn't reliable for anything.
9.6m is the result of many years of cancers. 3.1m is only the count of deaths within 28 days over 1 year and is unreliable anyway.
The UK count is one of the best and we know it's 40% understated. In India currently they're talking about deaths being 200-500% understated. And I'm pretty sure N.Korea is understated at zero, as is China's made up number.
And with your own numbers, I'm pretty sure 9.6m isn't 4x 3.1m as you claimed at the start, so thanks for confirming you were wrong even by your own dodgy measure.

Still, I'm sure everything else you said was meticulously accurate
Worldometer states facts, not government biased stuff to make sheep do what they say. And 9.6m is for ONE YEAR, I explained that. 9.6 is roughly 4x3.1, the last time (2 months ago) I checked the variable figures it was closer to 4. It's certainly a much larger number than 3.1. So worry about the 9.6, not the 3.1. You are far more likely to die of cancer. As for the numbers being understated, I disagree. They're overstated. How many people catch it, don't get symptoms (or just mild ones) and don't report it? More of us are immune than the hospitals think.

Worldometer isn't accurate for anything.
The reason your figure was 4x and changed to 3.1x over time is that you rely on comparing it to the total world pop'n (which is comparatively fixed over the short term) and the deaths figure at the time you look at it, which is still increasing rapidly, that only came to light early last year. By the end of the year it'll be 1 in 2.x and continue to increase. Meanwhile, cancer has existed for more than an average lifetime, so it's the culmination of a lifetime of development.
And, of course, while you may be more likely to die from Cancer over 20+yrs, that's compared to CV19 in 28 days. Apples v bicycles.

There's also no way of telling if you're more or less likely to die of CV19 until after you've had it. Most people haven't had it.
It's a bit like saying people are immune to strychnine because a vanishingly small number of people have taken strychnine. That hardly implies immunity to it.
Irrespective of the number of people who've had CV19, if the number of people who are recorded to have died is dependent on having been tested for it too, which the majority of people haven't, then it makes no difference. So 4.4m positive tested, 152k positive tested <and> died from it, then the proportion is 1 in 29.
Because ONS derived additional deaths that they're not allowed to include in the official numbers only because they don't conform to the definition of a CV19 death that match those unquantified untested infections. You can't have one without the other. It's still 1 in 29 dead, 1 in 9.5 hospitalised.
ID: 101623 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mikey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 06
Posts: 1895
Credit: 9,214,047
RAC: 1,450
Message 101624 - Posted: 30 Apr 2021, 13:29:11 UTC - in response to Message 101618.  

The leaders of both the UK and USA governments had it and survived. And neither of those were particularly healthy.


Actually the President of the US came close to being on a ventilator and the only thing that saved him was an EXTREMELY experimental treatment that worked. Despite his 'show of invincibility' the dude almost died from covid!!! He then quietly got vaccinated WHILE telling people he was fit as a fiddle and that Covid was nothing more than a 'mild case of the flu'. He LIED about Covid just like LIED about him 'winning the election'! He lost the election simply because he was a POS as far as how he treated others!!! He became President in 2016 because the ONLY other choice was Hillary Clinton and her reputation was SOOO soiled that if she ran for dog catcher in a hole in the wall town in Arkansas a frickin dog would have won instead of her!!! In the US we do have Green and other so called 3rd political parties but there chance of winning is realistically the same as a snowballs chance in hell. When Trump imitated that handicapped reporter on the News time after time he lost more and more of the "undecided" voters which is the key to winning any National election, then bashing some favorite politicians and war heroes and that recording of him saying to 'grab women by their pussy' he just put his chances out of reach.
ID: 101624 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mikey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 06
Posts: 1895
Credit: 9,214,047
RAC: 1,450
Message 101626 - Posted: 30 Apr 2021, 13:34:39 UTC - in response to Message 101620.  

Well you gotta change those gun death stats somehow, they're embarrassing! Why not make a fuss about those instead of the virus and ban guns?


America's "problem" with guns has very little to do with guns themselves and more to do with the people that are able to get their hands on them that should NEVER ever be allowed to own a fricking garden trowel!! The Laws are a hodgepodge of State Laws, think of England and Scotland Counties as each making their own Laws and you see the problem except the US is ALOT bigger in area and States.
ID: 101626 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 105 · 106 · 107 · 108 · 109 · 110 · 111 . . . 309 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org