Seti is 10 X faster with Cuda, why not Rosetta ?

Message boards : Number crunching : Seti is 10 X faster with Cuda, why not Rosetta ?

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Zarck

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 05
Posts: 40
Credit: 7,364,881
RAC: 632
Message 70203 - Posted: 1 May 2011, 13:14:11 UTC
Last modified: 1 May 2011, 13:16:58 UTC

Seti is 10 times faster with Cuda, why not Rosetta ?

@+
*_*
ID: 70203 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Old man

Send message
Joined: 10 Nov 07
Posts: 25
Credit: 1,122,372
RAC: 0
Message 70208 - Posted: 1 May 2011, 17:11:43 UTC - in response to Message 70203.  

Seti is 10 times faster with Cuda, why not Rosetta ?

@+
*_*


There is many theard about that:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=5619#69483

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=5640

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=5650#69768

Read them.
ID: 70208 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 70209 - Posted: 1 May 2011, 17:18:23 UTC
Last modified: 2 May 2011, 16:49:58 UTC

Zarck, you've only posted on these message boards 4 times. Each time with a simple little one or two sentence question about GPU processing, and no further participation in the resulting discussion.

Do you have something new to ask now? Or do you wish to rehash all of the same stuff a fourth time?
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 70209 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Zarck

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 05
Posts: 40
Credit: 7,364,881
RAC: 632
Message 70219 - Posted: 2 May 2011, 10:56:19 UTC - in response to Message 70208.  

Seti is 10 times faster with Cuda, why not Rosetta ?

@+
*_*


There is many theard about that:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=5619#69483

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=5640

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=5650#69768

Read them.


Excuse me.


ID: 70219 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Old man

Send message
Joined: 10 Nov 07
Posts: 25
Credit: 1,122,372
RAC: 0
Message 70230 - Posted: 3 May 2011, 6:11:05 UTC - in response to Message 70219.  

Seti is 10 times faster with Cuda, why not Rosetta ?

@+
*_*


There is many theard about that:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=5619#69483

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=5640

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=5650#69768

Read them.


Excuse me.



One theard more. Maybe this helps.

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=5218&nowrap=true#64790

You have asked that same question many times in this forum. There are also many other thears available about GPU support in this project.

There are also "Search forums" tab available. Next time when you want ask something, try use it.

The rest of us do not want to answer the same question every other day. See those links in threads. People here have answered Cuda/Cal/OpenCL questions many times already.

To all others: Sorry my poor english. I'm not native english speaker. I hope that someone understands my message.
ID: 70230 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mikey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 06
Posts: 1895
Credit: 9,214,047
RAC: 1,450
Message 70231 - Posted: 3 May 2011, 10:05:04 UTC - in response to Message 70230.  

Seti is 10 times faster with Cuda, why not Rosetta ?

@+
*_*


There is many theard about that:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=5619#69483

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=5640

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=5650#69768

Read them.


Excuse me.



One theard more. Maybe this helps.

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=5218&nowrap=true#64790

You have asked that same question many times in this forum. There are also many other thears available about GPU support in this project.

There are also "Search forums" tab available. Next time when you want ask something, try use it.

The rest of us do not want to answer the same question every other day. See those links in threads. People here have answered Cuda/Cal/OpenCL questions many times already.

To all others: Sorry my poor english. I'm not native english speaker. I hope that someone understands my message.


Your English is better than our Mongolian, don't worry about it!!
ID: 70231 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Zarck

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 05
Posts: 40
Credit: 7,364,881
RAC: 632
Message 70548 - Posted: 13 Jun 2011, 15:59:13 UTC
Last modified: 13 Jun 2011, 16:08:33 UTC

http://developer.nvidia.com/category/zone/cuda-zone

http://developer.amd.com/zones/OpenCLZone/universities/Pages/default.aspx

@+
*_*

)

[edit] Attach to projects with GPU applications

Projects with NVIDIA applications:
AQUA@home (CUDA offline)
Collatz Conjecture (Windows and Mac OS X on Intel)
DistrRTgen (Windows, Linux 64bit)
DNETC@Home (Windows, Linux 32bit, Linux 64bit )
Einstein (Linux, Windows and Mac OS X on Intel)
GPUgrid.net (Linux 64bit and Windows)
Lattice (Coming soon)
Milkyway@home (Double precision GPU required, so compute capability 1.3 or higher, meaning a GForce GTX 260 or better) (Linux 64bit and Windows)
Moo! (Driver 256.00 or better, Compute Capability 1.0 or higher, Minimum device memory 64MB - http://moowrap.net/forum_thread.php?id=16)
PrimeGrid (Proth Prime Search (Sieve), Linux 32bit, Linux 64bit Windows and Mac OS X on Intel; Cullen/Woodall Prime Search (Sieve), Linux 32bit, Linux 64bit, Windows and Mac OS X on Intel)
SETI@home (Windows only)
SETI@home Beta (Windows only)

Projects with ATI applications:
Collatz Conjecture (Windows, Windows 64bit, Linux 64bit)
DNETC@Home (Windows and Linux 32bit)
Milkyway@home (Double precision GPU required, so a Radeon HD 38xx, 48xx, 47xx, 58xx, 69xx, FirePro V87xx, FireStream 92xx) (Windows only)
Moo! (Driver v10.4 or later, ATI Runtime (not older AMD), Minimum device memory 250MB - http://moowrap.net/forum_thread.php?id=16)
PrimeGrid (Proth Prime Search (Sieve), Linux 32bit, Linux 64bit and Windows)
SETI@home Beta (Windows only)

You're done! Soon you'll be racking up big credit numbers. Of course, you can attach to other projects too; BOINC will keep both your CPU and GPU busy.
ID: 70548 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 5691
Credit: 5,859,226
RAC: 0
Message 70571 - Posted: 17 Jun 2011, 20:35:31 UTC

this thread is about comparing apples to oranges in the computer world.
your question has been asked and answered a few times.

now your "pitching" cuda projects on another projects technical board?
come on!
ID: 70571 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Link
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 May 07
Posts: 356
Credit: 382,349
RAC: 0
Message 70575 - Posted: 18 Jun 2011, 9:38:51 UTC - in response to Message 70548.  

Projects with ATI applications:
(...)
Milkyway@home (Double precision GPU required, so a Radeon HD 38xx, 48xx, 47xx, 58xx, 69xx, FirePro V87xx, FireStream 92xx) (Windows only)

No, not Windows only: Milkyway@Home Applications Page




.
ID: 70575 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Seti is 10 X faster with Cuda, why not Rosetta ?



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org